What Mike Seaver is hearing

Comments

• pawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,898

  November 2020

  Not chinteresting, or funny. That would be some chicken shit ducking.

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

  November 2020

  Fuck

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• backthepack Member Posts: 19,861

  November 2020 edited November 2020

  Big if true

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• ntxduck Member Posts: 5,680

  November 2020

  Is this a kim copypasta?

  7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,458

  November 2020

  It is true
  
  The seed will be planted Tuesday...Thursday night “we did all we could.”

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• MikeSeaver Member Posts: 4,914

  November 2020

  HuskyJW said:

  It is true
  
  The seed will be planted Tuesday...Thursday night “we did all we could.”

  Maybe don’t leave Nike next time.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• dnc Member Posts: 56,713

  November 2020

  I'm sure this has been covered, but why would Oregon win the tiebreaker in that event? Both teams 5-0, no head-to-head.
  
  Is it because they'd be higher in the CFP?

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,244

  November 2020

  dnc said:

  I'm sure this has been covered, but why would Oregon win the tiebreaker in that event? Both teams 5-0, no head-to-head.
  
  Is it because they'd be higher in the CFP?

  I think it does go to the higher ranking which is why, of UW continues on their current (2-game) trajectory, they need to blow teams the fuck out. No more letting the 3rd string in in the 4th quarter to make the score look respectable

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• ntxduck Member Posts: 5,680

  November 2020

  dnc said:

  I'm sure this has been covered, but why would Oregon win the tiebreaker in that event? Both teams 5-0, no head-to-head.
  
  Is it because they'd be higher in the CFP?

  Wouldn’t UW be 4-0?

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813

  November 2020

  ntxduck said:

  dnc said:

  I'm sure this has been covered, but why would Oregon win the tiebreaker in that event? Both teams 5-0, no head-to-head.
  
  Is it because they'd be higher in the CFP?

  Wouldn’t UW be 4-0?

  But still...

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• TheRoarOfTheCrowd Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,725

  November 2020 edited November 2020

  ntxduck said:

  dnc said:

  I'm sure this has been covered, but why would Oregon win the tiebreaker in that event? Both teams 5-0, no head-to-head.
  
  Is it because they'd be higher in the CFP?

  Wouldn’t UW be 4-0?

  Wouldn't Washington have the ability to schedule BYU? to replace oregon? or USC or any other team that is Pac 12 that still needs games? Agree that Dawgs need to blow some teams out to help in the equation in the meantime. Wouldn't ducking Washington complicate their ability to play a conference championship game the following week, assuming there is even a game to be played? I don't buy that it would make any sense for the Ducks to Duck, assuming that any of this means anything anyway.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• dnc Member Posts: 56,713

  November 2020

  ntxduck said:

  dnc said:

  I'm sure this has been covered, but why would Oregon win the tiebreaker in that event? Both teams 5-0, no head-to-head.
  
  Is it because they'd be higher in the CFP?

  Wouldn’t UW be 4-0?

  Good point but presumably UW would get another P12 opponent that weekend.
  

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

  November 2020

  Oregon thinks they are playing for the playoff.
  
  
  This is dumb.

  21 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• dnc Member Posts: 56,713

  November 2020

  FremontTroll said:

  Oregon thinks they are playing for the playoff.
  
  
  This is dumb.

  excellent point
  
  

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• ntxduck Member Posts: 5,680

  November 2020

  FremontTroll said:

  Oregon thinks they are playing for the playoff.
  
  
  This is dumb.

  This whole scenario is made up

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• dnc Member Posts: 56,713

  November 2020

  ntxduck said:

  FremontTroll said:

  Oregon thinks they are playing for the playoff.
  
  
  This is dumb.

  This whole scenario is made up

  AGREE

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• ntxduck Member Posts: 5,680

  November 2020

  dnc said:

  ntxduck said:

  FremontTroll said:

  Oregon thinks they are playing for the playoff.
  
  
  This is dumb.

  This whole scenario is made up

  AGREE

  If you want to look at a team that’s actually doing this, I’d be surprised if sc plays again the rest of the year until the CCG

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• MikeSeaver Member Posts: 4,914

  November 2020

  FremontTroll said:

  Oregon thinks they are playing for the playoff.
  
  
  

  No, they don’t.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,800

  November 2020

  death, taxes, and mike seaver threads i see

  12 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• MikeSeaver Member Posts: 4,914

  November 2020

  ntxduck said:

  dnc said:

  ntxduck said:

  FremontTroll said:

  Oregon thinks they are playing for the playoff.
  
  
  This is dumb.

  This whole scenario is made up

  AGREE

  If you want to look at a team that’s actually doing this, I’d be surprised if sc plays again the rest of the year until the CCG

  “There’s no way Oregon would do this but USC is.”
  
  👌
  
  Chins galore.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter