Libertarian Public Health
Comments
-
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage. -
Please don't ever try to run a business. 5 days does not a trend make.HHusky said:
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
Go back to Dazzling legal analysis. Leave the numbers to professionals.
-
Funny. I can remember way back to July, when North Dakota wasn’t rapidly closing in on New York’s death rate. Sucks having South Dakota as a neighbor, of course.PurpleThrobber said:
Please don't ever try to run a business. 5 days does not a trend make.HHusky said:
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
Go back to Dazzling legal analysis. Leave the numbers to professionals.
#MasksDontWork! -
One where they next want us to start ratting out our family and friends.GrundleStiltzkin said: -
Keep us posted, shitstain. In 5 days everyone in South and North Dakota will be dead?HHusky said:
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage. -
You’re thinking of Iowa. Understandable error.hardhat said:
Keep us posted, shitstain. In 5 days everyone in South and North Dakota will be dead?HHusky said:
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage. -
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . . -
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . . -
Start? Been going on since the jump in Warshington.EsophagealFeces said:
One where they next want us to start ratting out our family and friends.GrundleStiltzkin said: -
181 > 140HHusky said:
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . .
PT assures me there is no trend.




