2019 Stanford
Comments
-
Every team UW has lost to the last 5 years were all strong running teams. Even look at Oregon last year, Cristobal just kept handing it off when Herbert was trying to throw the game away.dnc said:Yes I think Lake is making the classic mistake of "what is hardest for me to defend against = what kind of offense we need" when what he doesn't realize is that he's not building an offense to beat his defense, he's building an offense to beat Pac12 defenses and Pac12 defenses aren't near as good as defending the pass as his defense.
TL;DR: *Gurgle*
Bama, tOSU, Penn St., Stanford, Oregon...They all could run power when they wanted to and play keep away if need be.
-
Hurts was a raw freshmen in the playoff game. If Bama didn't have the rumbling backs they could have been in trouble had Jake not bailed them outKingdome_Urinals said:
Every team UW has lost to the last 5 years were all strong running teams. Even look at Oregon last year, Cristobal just kept handing it off when Herbert was trying to throw the game away.dnc said:Yes I think Lake is making the classic mistake of "what is hardest for me to defend against = what kind of offense we need" when what he doesn't realize is that he's not building an offense to beat his defense, he's building an offense to beat Pac12 defenses and Pac12 defenses aren't near as good as defending the pass as his defense.
TL;DR: *Gurgle*
Bama, tOSU, Penn St., Stanford, Oregon...They all could run power when they wanted to and play keep away if need be.
UW could have beat Hurts -
Consider that three different passes were dropped in the endzone. It's not like Jimmy handed off every play, Ty Jones, and Odunze botched it. So did Bynum on third down, etc..dnc said:
You might be right.Bread said:Jimmy is a little smarter then you idiots. They aren't rolling out a power run scheme every week. He hates offenses that target his defenses weakness. The offense is going to attack each teams weakness.
Complete opposite of Petersen's "who cares who we play, we are just going to do what we do best."
If all we can score is 27 points by attacking OSU's weaknesses I have a lot of questions.
Those miscues do not owe to a "running philosophy." They owe to 4 star WR's fucking up at their jobs. -
To me, it's as simple as this:
If Alabama or Ohio State or Clemson East were to pop into Microwave Burrito Stadium to face off against the mighty Oregon State Babushkas, is their offensive philosophy to target OSU's weakness on defense? Or is their philosophy to do whatever the fuck they want because they're that much better? I'm betting Alabama would roll in there and pass for 400 yards rather easily.
If I were to pick a fistfight with a crippled eight year old girl, I would wail away in any manner I please. Avoiding her left side because her right hook is weaker would be... pathetic. -
tOSU and Penn State absolutely beat us with the pass.Kingdome_Urinals said:
Every team UW has lost to the last 5 years were all strong running teams. Even look at Oregon last year, Cristobal just kept handing it off when Herbert was trying to throw the game away.dnc said:Yes I think Lake is making the classic mistake of "what is hardest for me to defend against = what kind of offense we need" when what he doesn't realize is that he's not building an offense to beat his defense, he's building an offense to beat Pac12 defenses and Pac12 defenses aren't near as good as defending the pass as his defense.
TL;DR: *Gurgle*
Bama, tOSU, Penn St., Stanford, Oregon...They all could run power when they wanted to and play keep away if need be.
The others I agree.
And again this isn't coincidence and it isn't because running is a superior strategy. It's because our defense is designed to stop the pass. 2 down lineman and 5 DB's in base is highly unusual, and it's been highly effective overall. Jimmy understands innately that the passing game is the most valuable part of the game, that's why he (and K) attempt to take it away (and basically outside of the Penn State and tOSU games, succeed) from other team's offenses first.
It's just fascinating that he doesn't carry that same mindset to the offensive side of the ball. -
I wasn't a big fan of your offseason posts but you and I have seen eye to eye the last few days for sure. Good chit man.1to392831weretaken said:To me, it's as simple as this:
If Alabama or Ohio State or Clemson East were to pop into Microwave Burrito Stadium to face off against the mighty Oregon State Babushkas, is their offensive philosophy to target OSU's weakness on defense? Or is their philosophy to do whatever the fuck they want because they're that much better? I'm betting Alabama would roll in there and pass for 400 yards rather easily.
If I were to pick a fistfight with a crippled eight year old girl, I would wail away in any manner I please. Avoiding her left side because her right hook is weaker would be... pathetic. -
We ran 51 times and threw 24 (and those numbers aren't skewed by sacks as there weren't any). And it's not like we had a huge lead and were sitting on the ball to kill clock half the game either. The game plan was to run twice as much as we passed.Kingdome_Urinals said:
Consider that three different passes were dropped in the endzone. It's not like Jimmy handed off every play, Ty Jones, and Odunze botched it. So did Bynum on third down, etc..dnc said:
You might be right.Bread said:Jimmy is a little smarter then you idiots. They aren't rolling out a power run scheme every week. He hates offenses that target his defenses weakness. The offense is going to attack each teams weakness.
Complete opposite of Petersen's "who cares who we play, we are just going to do what we do best."
If all we can score is 27 points by attacking OSU's weaknesses I have a lot of questions.
Those miscues do not owe to a "running philosophy." They owe to 4 star WR's fucking up at their jobs.
We won, so it worked, I guess.
But running like you're 1990s Nebraska without the benefit of an option QB wasn't anything that should inspire confidence in anyone. -
Look, I get it: Sigur Ros isn't for everyone. But it's not real life like Husky football.dnc said:
I wasn't a big fan of your offseason posts but you and I have seen eye to eye the last few days for sure. Good chit man.1to392831weretaken said:To me, it's as simple as this:
If Alabama or Ohio State or Clemson East were to pop into Microwave Burrito Stadium to face off against the mighty Oregon State Babushkas, is their offensive philosophy to target OSU's weakness on defense? Or is their philosophy to do whatever the fuck they want because they're that much better? I'm betting Alabama would roll in there and pass for 400 yards rather easily.
If I were to pick a fistfight with a crippled eight year old girl, I would wail away in any manner I please. Avoiding her left side because her right hook is weaker would be... pathetic. -
We just need more recruits with 2 black parents, that are also not Nigerians like Ulofoshio, and all are problems will be solvedRaceBannon said:
ThisBread said:Jimmy is a little smarter then you idiots. They aren't rolling out a power run scheme every week. He hates offenses that target his defenses weakness. The offense is going to attack each teams weakness.
Complete opposite of Petersen's "who cares who we play, we are just going to do what we do best."
While it is possible to be worse than Peterson I don't see it happening
By the time Pete let I was so over him it wasn't funny
And by the way the TSIO guys have some explaining to do as well. Blue chips my ass
Get me football players who make football plays. Not 7 on 7 all stars
According to those fucking idiots -
dnc said:
Yes I think Lake is making the classic mistake of "what is hardest for me to defend against = what kind of offense we need" when what he doesn't realize is that he's not building an offense to beat his defense, he's building an offense to beat Pac12 defenses and Pac12 defenses aren't near as good as defending the pass as his defense.
TL;DR: *Gurgle*
This is what I believe in my gut is happening. He’s a smart guy but also stubborn and wants to outthink the room. Most teams don’t have his defense and can’t pull it off the same way because they don’t have Kwat and don’t have the same coaching abilities or development abilities.Bread said:Jimmy is a little smarter then you idiots. They aren't rolling out a power run scheme every week. He hates offenses that target his defenses weakness. The offense is going to attack each teams weakness.
Complete opposite of Petersen's "who cares who we play, we are just going to do what we do best."
This is what I want to believe is happening. He’s a smart guy who is also stubborn and wants to outthink the room and be on the cutting edge. Zig when others are zagging. Use your talent and depth to come up with a multiple offense, not shifts and formations, but personnel groupings that can be adjusted to the other team and exploit their weaknesses.dnc said:
You might be right.Bread said:Jimmy is a little smarter then you idiots. They aren't rolling out a power run scheme every week. He hates offenses that target his defenses weakness. The offense is going to attack each teams weakness.
Complete opposite of Petersen's "who cares who we play, we are just going to do what we do best."
If all we can score is 27 points by attacking OSU's weaknesses I have a lot of questions.
Agreed. It was a sloppy game with a lot of miscues and points left on the field. There are a lot of things that need to get better. My hope is that there was no spring ball for development, and no Fall Camp. There is some quick learning and development that needs to take place.
