The O line
Comments
-
Dude he lol'd. That means he's really sure and is mocking anyone who doesn't see it. You can't argue when they lol.1to392831weretaken said:
Was it every long/TD run that went over the left side or just almost all of them? I can't remember.backthepack said:
Curne’s looked much better than Jaxson lol.dnc said:
Then none of them arebackthepack said:
He’s not good enough for where we want to be.GreenRiverGatorz said:
You keep stacking the bad takes like cordwood.backthepack said:Bain and Curne are amazing.
Ale is getting there.
Kirkland and Wattenberg suck -
1) High percentage of plays w 2 or 3 TEs
2) Run first offense that is keeping the offense "on time"
3) High rate of 3rd down conversions - especially when running
4) Dominating TOP
It's the HH offense people cried for -- one that plays to our proven strengths (RB, O-line, TE) and should help RB recruiting going forward.
I'm looking for any reason to bash the OC but this gameplan all things considered was fine to me. Now if it's the same exact thing against UA... -
You should consider self-immolation. Its for the good of the bored. And for the good of Husky Football.backthepack said:
He’s not good enough for where we want to be.GreenRiverGatorz said:
You keep stacking the bad takes like cordwood.backthepack said:Bain and Curne are amazing.
Ale is getting there.
Kirkland and Wattenberg suck
-
Yeah he’s a real road grader!!1to392831weretaken said:
Was it every long/TD run that went over the left side or just almost all of them? I can't remember.backthepack said:
Curne’s looked much better than Jaxson lol.dnc said:
Then none of them arebackthepack said:
He’s not good enough for where we want to be.GreenRiverGatorz said:
You keep stacking the bad takes like cordwood.backthepack said:Bain and Curne are amazing.
Ale is getting there.
Kirkland and Wattenberg suck
-
This is BTP we're talking about, I'm pretty sure typing "lol" is some form of tourette's that he can't help, so I didn't even see it!...chuck said:
Dude he lol'd. That means he's really sure and is mocking anyone who doesn't see it. You can't argue when they lol.1to392831weretaken said:
Was it every long/TD run that went over the left side or just almost all of them? I can't remember.backthepack said:
Curne’s looked much better than Jaxson lol.dnc said:
Then none of them arebackthepack said:
He’s not good enough for where we want to be.GreenRiverGatorz said:
You keep stacking the bad takes like cordwood.backthepack said:Bain and Curne are amazing.
Ale is getting there.
Kirkland and Wattenberg suck -
Gladstone said:
1) High percentage of plays w 2 or 3 TEs
2) Run first offense that is keeping the offense "on time"
3) High rate of 3rd down conversions - especially when running
4) Dominating TOP
It's the HH offense people cried for -- one that plays to our proven strengths (RB, O-line, TE) and should help RB recruiting going forward.
I'm looking for any reason to bash the OC but this gameplan all things considered was fine to me. Now if it's the same exact thing against UA...
Thank you Doogstone. This is how I felt the last two days as I’ve been reading the boreds. No getting cute when you’re running it down the defense’s throat. No crazy formations with 17 shifts.
OSU had a weakness and Lake kept at it. The drops by Bynum, Puka, Ty, and Rome would have been big conversions and two TDs. Suddenly Morris’ numbers look much better for his first game and throw in 267 on the ground for good measure.
They had a game plan for OSU’s weakness on the line, the weather, and an inexperienced line and WB, and it worked. Lake says they plan for their offense to be able to execute multiple game plans, and we will see if that is true against Arizona. Let’s see if they are a multiple offense that adjusts to their opponent. Let’s see if Lake is all talk.
Throughout camp WR spoke highly of the aggressive downfield passing with chances to make plays. I doubt they say that shit if all they do is block. -
Well, we ran all over Arizona last year and USC put up nearly 500 yards on them last week. So I would expect healthy doses of running. Then, presumably, a healthy portion of those "downfield strikes" we've heard so much about.DoogCourics said:Gladstone said:1) High percentage of plays w 2 or 3 TEs
2) Run first offense that is keeping the offense "on time"
3) High rate of 3rd down conversions - especially when running
4) Dominating TOP
It's the HH offense people cried for -- one that plays to our proven strengths (RB, O-line, TE) and should help RB recruiting going forward.
I'm looking for any reason to bash the OC but this gameplan all things considered was fine to me. Now if it's the same exact thing against UA...
Thank you Doogstone. This is how I felt the last two days as I’ve been reading the boreds. No getting cute when you’re running it down the defense’s throat. No crazy formations with 17 shifts.
OSU had a weakness and Lake kept at it. The drops by Bynum, Puka, Ty, and Rome would have been big conversions and two TDs. Suddenly Morris’ numbers look much better for his first game and throw in 267 on the ground for good measure.
They had a game plan for OSU’s weakness on the line, the weather, and an inexperienced line and WB, and it worked. Lake says they plan for their offense to be able to execute multiple game plans, and we will see if that is true against Arizona. Let’s see if they are a multiple offense that adjusts to their opponent. Let’s see if Lake is all talk.
Throughout camp WR spoke highly of the aggressive downfield passing with chances to make plays. I doubt they say that shit if all they do is block. -
It appears this post wasn't well supported junior. I got you though.backthepack said:Bain and Curne are amazing.
Ale is getting there.
Kirkland and Wattenberg suck -
Especially fudgie. Elite. lol.chuck said:
Dude he lol'd. That means he's really sure and is mocking anyone who doesn't see it. You can't argue when they lol.1to392831weretaken said:
Was it every long/TD run that went over the left side or just almost all of them? I can't remember.backthepack said:
Curne’s looked much better than Jaxson lol.dnc said:
Then none of them arebackthepack said:
He’s not good enough for where we want to be.GreenRiverGatorz said:
You keep stacking the bad takes like cordwood.backthepack said:Bain and Curne are amazing.
Ale is getting there.
Kirkland and Wattenberg suck -
I haven't been able to get through the first two sentences of any post you've made since we? went to sigs.pawz said:
You should consider self-immolation. Its for the good of the bored. And for the good of Husky Football.backthepack said:
He’s not good enough for where we want to be.GreenRiverGatorz said:
You keep stacking the bad takes like cordwood.backthepack said:Bain and Curne are amazing.
Ale is getting there.
Kirkland and Wattenberg suck
