Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Penn Judge says No to late arriving ballots

1246

Comments

  • KimsCopperPenny
    KimsCopperPenny Member Posts: 271
    YellowSnow said:

    Swaye said:

    dnc said:

    This is an important precedent for future elections but it isn't going to win PA back for Trump.

    At this point we just need to unfuck this for future elections. Clean up the voter rolls. Fix the fucking software "glitches" and providers. Reign in the judicial activism on setting election parameters. Etc. Fix this shit so it doesn't keep happening.
    No matter how much we clean things up unless we get past giant douche vs turd sammich 50/50 contests, the losing sides true believers are gonna scream cheating.
    People are screaming about cheating because there was cheating.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,602 Standard Supporter
    The constitution says we have a day to vote. The 3rd. Not before not after or any other bullshit IIRC. So how do we early vote let alone late vote?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Houhusky said:

    GreenRiverGatorz said:

    Houhusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fraud is fine if you don't like the candidate

    No it’s not fine. Forgive me for not taking the word of the Tug that the election was stolen from Trump.
    How could someone prove fraud to you?

    why dont you articulate your threshold, or is this some thing where you need an authoritative person/body telling you it happened in order to believe it happened?
    Is this a real question of are you pretending to be dumb? Fraud can be proven the same way fraud is always proven - with evidence. The Trump campaign had watchers in every swing precinct and has war chests and teams of lawyers expressly dedicated to uncovering this shit.

    The supposed helplessness of Trump is a bunch of fucking histrionics.
    I asked it because if you will only believe something when someone authoritative tells you what to believe its rather pointless to discuss it in the first place...

    might as well argue about what REAL god said while we are at it too.
    Not sure what you're getting at. Am I going to listen to a bunch of Breitbart fanatics on Twitter screaming about fraud with a handful of videos and half baked theories? No.

    In the sense that I'll go ahead and defer to a judge on this one and LIFPO, then yeah, I suppose I need someone authoritative to weigh in.

    And that leaves us with what?

    It’s only possible to believe fraud (or anything) occurred if the majority of 9 philosopher kings decree is so?

    The guy who blindly believes the Twitter fags is just as dumb as the guy who blindly believes Elena Kagen or kavanaugh are arbiters of truth.

    There is another option... How about looking at evidence yourself and forming your own opinion? Which is why I asked what evidence might be compelling...

    I don’t understand why is so difficult or absurd in asking someone what they think they would have to see/know to change their mind or believe something? Especially someone who is already ceding that they don’t already know the answer...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    Houhusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fraud is fine if you don't like the candidate

    No it’s not fine. Forgive me for not taking the word of the Tug that the election was stolen from Trump.
    How could someone prove fraud to you?

    why dont you articulate your threshold, or is this some thing where you need an authoritative person/body telling you it happened in order to believe it happened?
    Go to fucking court with some evidence. Stand in front of a judge, make your charge, and back it the fuck up with evidence.

    So simple even a Democrat could do it.....................if they were right.

    "Election fraud!!" The battle cry of the fucking loser. "It's still better than being at work!" is what the loser on the river says when the fish box is empty.

    Sad!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,168
    dflea said:

    Houhusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fraud is fine if you don't like the candidate

    No it’s not fine. Forgive me for not taking the word of the Tug that the election was stolen from Trump.
    How could someone prove fraud to you?

    why dont you articulate your threshold, or is this some thing where you need an authoritative person/body telling you it happened in order to believe it happened?
    Go to fucking court with some evidence. Stand in front of a judge, make your charge, and back it the fuck up with evidence.

    So simple even a Democrat could do it.....................if they were right.

    "Election fraud!!" The battle cry of the fucking loser. "It's still better than being at work!" is what the loser on the river says when the fish box is empty.

    Sad!!
    "It's still beats a day at work!"

    The mantra of every unoriginal asshat who's ever set foot on a golf course. And a boat apparently.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    dflea said:

    Houhusky said:

    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fraud is fine if you don't like the candidate

    No it’s not fine. Forgive me for not taking the word of the Tug that the election was stolen from Trump.
    How could someone prove fraud to you?

    why dont you articulate your threshold, or is this some thing where you need an authoritative person/body telling you it happened in order to believe it happened?
    Go to fucking court with some evidence. Stand in front of a judge, make your charge, and back it the fuck up with evidence.

    So simple even a Democrat could do it.....................if they were right.

    "Election fraud!!" The battle cry of the fucking loser. "It's still better than being at work!" is what the loser on the river says when the fish box is empty.

    Sad!!
    Deflecting to an authority when asked about the formation of a personal opinion

    reminds me of my days of arguing with religious fanatics

    Can't set an actual benchmark, would allow the tiny possibility of reaching it.

    All opinions must be first successfully argued in court, the courts say so.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HairyBallsDawg
    HairyBallsDawg Member Posts: 1,078
    Pro tip : the ballots that arrived too late were already not included in the reported counts as per SCOTUS directions from over a week ago -- their counts were already in a separate bucket. This ruling isn't going to help the loser Trump. At most it will just prevent his loss in PA from looking even bigger than it already looks.

    Biden flipped 3 states.

    Winners win.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter