Biden on voter fraud

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Joey Salads video or fuck off!

When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.

https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s

That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?

I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.

You voted for Individual 1.

So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.

Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.

I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.

And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.

As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.

Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.

You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?

Maybe you really don't.

That's a good Kunt, never admit you were talking out your ass. Those statistics speak directly to the issue and you know it that's why you now avoid the issue and try to change the topic.


What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order to make our taxation rate more progressive Dazzler? Give me a fucking number and try to answer a question for once in your pathetic life Dazzler.

You continue to talk about share of taxation, not rates of taxation.

Capital should not be preferred to work. Preferential rates of taxation on capital should be eliminated. There is no good policy reason for it. The effective rate of taxation on the top 1% filers is approximately 27%. At a time when we are running massive deficits, that is too low and it is that low as a direct result of this preference for capital. The argument that taxing investment income as ordinary income will stifle economic activity in nonsense and does not hold up under scrutiny.

What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order for us to have a progressive rate of taxation Dazzler?

So even having pointed out the disconnect in your question, you double down. Not smart. But very Daddy.

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Joey Salads video or fuck off!

When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.

https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s

That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?

I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.

You voted for Individual 1.

So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.

Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.

I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.

And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.

As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.

Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.

You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?

Maybe you really don't.

That's a good Kunt, never admit you were talking out your ass. Those statistics speak directly to the issue and you know it that's why you now avoid the issue and try to change the topic.


What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order to make our taxation rate more progressive Dazzler? Give me a fucking number and try to answer a question for once in your pathetic life Dazzler.

You continue to talk about share of taxation, not rates of taxation.

Capital should not be preferred to work. Preferential rates of taxation on capital should be eliminated. There is no good policy reason for it. The effective rate of taxation on the top 1% filers is approximately 27%. At a time when we are running massive deficits, that is too low and it is that low as a direct result of this preference for capital. The argument that taxing investment income as ordinary income will stifle economic activity in nonsense and does not hold up under scrutiny.

Are you pretending that poor people have investments?

BleachedAnusDawg said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Joey Salads video or fuck off!

When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.

https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s

That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?

I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.

You voted for Individual 1.

So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.

Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.

I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.

And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.

As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.

Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.

You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?

Maybe you really don't.

That's a good Kunt, never admit you were talking out your ass. Those statistics speak directly to the issue and you know it that's why you now avoid the issue and try to change the topic.


What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order to make our taxation rate more progressive Dazzler? Give me a fucking number and try to answer a question for once in your pathetic life Dazzler.

You continue to talk about share of taxation, not rates of taxation.

Capital should not be preferred to work. Preferential rates of taxation on capital should be eliminated. There is no good policy reason for it. The effective rate of taxation on the top 1% filers is approximately 27%. At a time when we are running massive deficits, that is too low and it is that low as a direct result of this preference for capital. The argument that taxing investment income as ordinary income will stifle economic activity in nonsense and does not hold up under scrutiny.

Are you pretending that poor people have investments?

Hardly. And?

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Joey Salads video or fuck off!

When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.

https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s

That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?

I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.

You voted for Individual 1.

So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.

Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.

I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.

And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.

As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.

Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.

You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?

Maybe you really don't.

That's a good Kunt, never admit you were talking out your ass. Those statistics speak directly to the issue and you know it that's why you now avoid the issue and try to change the topic.


What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order to make our taxation rate more progressive Dazzler? Give me a fucking number and try to answer a question for once in your pathetic life Dazzler.

You continue to talk about share of taxation, not rates of taxation.

Capital should not be preferred to work. Preferential rates of taxation on capital should be eliminated. There is no good policy reason for it. The effective rate of taxation on the top 1% filers is approximately 27%. At a time when we are running massive deficits, that is too low and it is that low as a direct result of this preference for capital. The argument that taxing investment income as ordinary income will stifle economic activity in nonsense and does not hold up under scrutiny.

What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order for us to have a progressive rate of taxation Dazzler?

So even having pointed out the disconnect in your question, you double down. Not smart. But very Daddy.

The only disconnect is with what you actually said, and your kunt act response as you run like a scalded dog from the question you were asked.

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Joey Salads video or fuck off!

When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.

https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s

That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?

I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.

You voted for Individual 1.

So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.

Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.

I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.

And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.

As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.

Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.

You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?

Maybe you really don't.

That's a good Kunt, never admit you were talking out your ass. Those statistics speak directly to the issue and you know it that's why you now avoid the issue and try to change the topic.


What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order to make our taxation rate more progressive Dazzler? Give me a fucking number and try to answer a question for once in your pathetic life Dazzler.

You continue to talk about share of taxation, not rates of taxation.

Capital should not be preferred to work. Preferential rates of taxation on capital should be eliminated. There is no good policy reason for it. The effective rate of taxation on the top 1% filers is approximately 27%. At a time when we are running massive deficits, that is too low and it is that low as a direct result of this preference for capital. The argument that taxing investment income as ordinary income will stifle economic activity in nonsense and does not hold up under scrutiny.

What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order for us to have a progressive rate of taxation Dazzler?

So even having pointed out the disconnect in your question, you double down. Not smart. But very Daddy.

The only disconnect is with what you actually said, and your kunt act response as you run like a scalded dog from the question you were asked.

Okay. You win. I'm not going to answer your irrelevant question.

Congratulations!

Amazing how often a question if answered, would expose you as the lying fool you are is determined to be "irrelevant" solely by you. You talked out your fucking ass Dazzler. You have nearly 1/2 of all income earners in this country pay nearly ZERO Federal income taxes but according to Dazzler the lying Kunt our system of taxation isn't even remotely progressive.

Why not just say that it's not as progressive as you like Kunt? Because it already is very progressive, despite your lie to the contrary. Take the fucking L Dazzler.

Joe was simply telling the truth. We know Obunghole cheated as well.

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Joey Salads video or fuck off!

When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.

https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s

That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?

I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.

You voted for Individual 1.

So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.

Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.

I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.

And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.

As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.

Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.

You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?

Maybe you really don't.

It’s almost like this guy enjoys being humiliated.

A true masochist.

The funny thing is how smugly he believes how much smarter he is then everyone else.

There is no way he believes all the shit that he posts. He’s a troll and likes fucking with you guys and gets enjoyment out of that. I don’t think he’s a conservative trying to make liberals look bad, but he amps up his liberal ways for the attention. It’s really fucking lame.