Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Biden on voter fraud
Comments
-
So for all the dementia deniers, what was joe trying to say when he did the gaff of gaffs?
-
The funny thing is how smugly he believes how much smarter he is then everyone else.NorthwestFresh said:
It’s almost like this guy enjoys being humiliated.HHusky said:
You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?SFGbob said:
As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.HHusky said:
I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.SFGbob said:
So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.HHusky said:
I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.SFGbob said:
That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?NorthwestFresh said:
When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.HHusky said:Joey Salads video or fuck off!
https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s
You voted for Individual 1.
Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.
And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.
Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.
Maybe you really don't.
A true masochist. -
You continue to talk about share of taxation, not rates of taxation.SFGbob said:
That's a good Kunt, never admit you were talking out your ass. Those statistics speak directly to the issue and you know it that's why you now avoid the issue and try to change the topic.HHusky said:
You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?SFGbob said:
As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.HHusky said:
I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.SFGbob said:
So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.HHusky said:
I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.SFGbob said:
That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?NorthwestFresh said:
When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.HHusky said:Joey Salads video or fuck off!
https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s
You voted for Individual 1.
Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.
And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.
Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.
Maybe you really don't.
What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order to make our taxation rate more progressive Dazzler? Give me a fucking number and try to answer a question for once in your pathetic life Dazzler.
Capital should not be preferred to work. Preferential rates of taxation on capital should be eliminated. There is no good policy reason for it. The effective rate of taxation on the top 1% filers is approximately 27%. At a time when we are running massive deficits, that is too low and it is that low as a direct result of this preference for capital. The argument that taxing investment income as ordinary income will stifle economic activity in nonsense and does not hold up under scrutiny. -
After interacting with the guy for five years, I can’t think of an instance where I thought “this guy is pretty sharp.” Whenever he steps outside of a pithy insult or a copy/paste, he gets exposed.SFGbob said:
The funny thing is how smugly he believes how much smarter he is then everyone else.NorthwestFresh said:
It’s almost like this guy enjoys being humiliated.HHusky said:
You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?SFGbob said:
As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.HHusky said:
I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.SFGbob said:
So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.HHusky said:
I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.SFGbob said:
That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?NorthwestFresh said:
When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.HHusky said:Joey Salads video or fuck off!
https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s
You voted for Individual 1.
Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.
And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.
Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.
Maybe you really don't.
A true masochist.
You can’t hide a high intelligence for five years, even on an anonymous forum.
This is who he is. A delusional liar with at best an average intellect. There is no JD, there is no MBA, there is no successful business. He didn’t even know about death being certificates submitted to states. -
Are you going to credit the work of the Leftist Tax Policy Center, or just pretend you came up with that all on your own as you re-worded someone else’s opinion?HHusky said:
You continue to talk about share of taxation, not rates of taxation.SFGbob said:
That's a good Kunt, never admit you were talking out your ass. Those statistics speak directly to the issue and you know it that's why you now avoid the issue and try to change the topic.HHusky said:
You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?SFGbob said:
As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.HHusky said:
I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.SFGbob said:
So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.HHusky said:
I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.SFGbob said:
That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?NorthwestFresh said:
When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.HHusky said:Joey Salads video or fuck off!
https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s
You voted for Individual 1.
Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.
And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.
Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.
Maybe you really don't.
What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order to make our taxation rate more progressive Dazzler? Give me a fucking number and try to answer a question for once in your pathetic life Dazzler.
Capital should not be preferred to work. Preferential rates of taxation on capital should be eliminated. There is no good policy reason for it. The effective rate of taxation on the top 1% filers is approximately 27%. At a time when we are running massive deficits, that is too low and it is that low as a direct result of this preference for capital. The argument that taxing investment income as ordinary income will stifle economic activity in nonsense and does not hold up under scrutiny.
https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/effective-income-tax-rates-have-fallen-top-one-percent-world-war-ii -
Surprised you didn't know I was actually expressing the original GOP position on the subject, Ivan.NorthwestFresh said:
Are you going to credit the work of the Leftist Tax Policy Center, or just pretend you came up with that all on your own as you re-worded someone else’s opinion?HHusky said:
You continue to talk about share of taxation, not rates of taxation.SFGbob said:
That's a good Kunt, never admit you were talking out your ass. Those statistics speak directly to the issue and you know it that's why you now avoid the issue and try to change the topic.HHusky said:
You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?SFGbob said:
As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.HHusky said:
I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.SFGbob said:
So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.HHusky said:
I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.SFGbob said:
That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?NorthwestFresh said:
When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.HHusky said:Joey Salads video or fuck off!
https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s
You voted for Individual 1.
Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.
And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.
Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.
Maybe you really don't.
What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order to make our taxation rate more progressive Dazzler? Give me a fucking number and try to answer a question for once in your pathetic life Dazzler.
Capital should not be preferred to work. Preferential rates of taxation on capital should be eliminated. There is no good policy reason for it. The effective rate of taxation on the top 1% filers is approximately 27%. At a time when we are running massive deficits, that is too low and it is that low as a direct result of this preference for capital. The argument that taxing investment income as ordinary income will stifle economic activity in nonsense and does not hold up under scrutiny.
https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/effective-income-tax-rates-have-fallen-top-one-percent-world-war-ii
More Taft than Lenin. -
All Dems are fags. All rinos are even worse
-
“Original GOP position.” It isn’t the position of today. Keep plagiarizing, though. You and Joe have that in common.HHusky said:
Surprised you didn't know I was actually expressing the original GOP position on the subject, Ivan.NorthwestFresh said:
Are you going to credit the work of the Leftist Tax Policy Center, or just pretend you came up with that all on your own as you re-worded someone else’s opinion?HHusky said:
You continue to talk about share of taxation, not rates of taxation.SFGbob said:
That's a good Kunt, never admit you were talking out your ass. Those statistics speak directly to the issue and you know it that's why you now avoid the issue and try to change the topic.HHusky said:
You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?SFGbob said:
As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.HHusky said:
I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.SFGbob said:
So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.HHusky said:
I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.SFGbob said:
That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?NorthwestFresh said:
When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.HHusky said:Joey Salads video or fuck off!
https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s
You voted for Individual 1.
Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.
And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.
Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.
Maybe you really don't.
What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order to make our taxation rate more progressive Dazzler? Give me a fucking number and try to answer a question for once in your pathetic life Dazzler.
Capital should not be preferred to work. Preferential rates of taxation on capital should be eliminated. There is no good policy reason for it. The effective rate of taxation on the top 1% filers is approximately 27%. At a time when we are running massive deficits, that is too low and it is that low as a direct result of this preference for capital. The argument that taxing investment income as ordinary income will stifle economic activity in nonsense and does not hold up under scrutiny.
https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/effective-income-tax-rates-have-fallen-top-one-percent-world-war-ii
More Taft than Lenin. -
When you get paid to shit poast, what difference does it make?NorthwestFresh said:
It’s almost like this guy enjoys being humiliated.HHusky said:
You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?SFGbob said:
As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.HHusky said:
I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.SFGbob said:
So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.HHusky said:
I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.SFGbob said:
That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?NorthwestFresh said:
When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.HHusky said:Joey Salads video or fuck off!
https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s
You voted for Individual 1.
Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.
And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.
Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.
Maybe you really don't.
A true masochist.
-
Your claim was that our taxation rate isn't even remotely progressive. You talked out your ass. You now try and move the goal posts to talk about the taxation rates for investment income.HHusky said:
You continue to talk about share of taxation, not rates of taxation.SFGbob said:
That's a good Kunt, never admit you were talking out your ass. Those statistics speak directly to the issue and you know it that's why you now avoid the issue and try to change the topic.HHusky said:
You do know that those statistics don't speak to the issue. Don't you?SFGbob said:
As I said, you love to lie to yourself. Top 50% of all income earners pay 98% of all income taxes. Top 10% of all income earners pay 70% of all income taxes, but according to the Dazzler this isn't even remotely a progressive rate of taxation.HHusky said:
I was also voting against Individual 1. I never said otherwise.SFGbob said:
So you really can't cite any policy being pushed by Biden that you support. It's really just a personality thing with you. Got it. We have progressive taxation now. We still have plenty of regulation on business and if you truly support the rule of law you wouldn't have excused what the Rats did to Trump with the phony Russian collusion fraud. You wouldn't have defended what was done to Flynn.HHusky said:
I support progressive taxation, reasonable regulation of business and the rule of law.SFGbob said:
That's the Dazzler's guy. Dazzler can you tell me the policies Biden and the Rats are pushing that you support? Because every time I try to pin you down on a particular policy you claim you don't support that. So just what exactly do you support?NorthwestFresh said:
When can we expect the cure for cancer, ”UC-Bakersfield?” Should be Priority One if Joe has the goods.HHusky said:Joey Salads video or fuck off!
https://youtu.be/_A6V6wxc81s
You voted for Individual 1.
Your entire existence is based upon lies you tell yourself Dazzler.
And we don't have anything remotely resembling progressive taxation. We haven't for decades.
Being both a liar and moron isn't very attractive Dazzler.
Maybe you really don't.
What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order to make our taxation rate more progressive Dazzler? Give me a fucking number and try to answer a question for once in your pathetic life Dazzler.
Capital should not be preferred to work. Preferential rates of taxation on capital should be eliminated. There is no good policy reason for it. The effective rate of taxation on the top 1% filers is approximately 27%. At a time when we are running massive deficits, that is too low and it is that low as a direct result of this preference for capital. The argument that taxing investment income as ordinary income will stifle economic activity in nonsense and does not hold up under scrutiny.
Fuck off Dazzler. What percentage of all income taxes should the top 10% of income earners pay in order for us to have a progressive rate of taxation Dazzler? Answer the fucking question for once in your pathetic life Dazzler.





