Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Why wear masks?
HHusky
Member Posts: 23,982
in Tug Tavern
https://www.valleynewslive.com/2020/10/30/1357-new-covid-cases-13-more-deaths-in-north-dakota/
This would be the proportional equivalent of California having more than 70,000 new cases and about 660 deaths in a day.
#BetterDeadandRed!
This would be the proportional equivalent of California having more than 70,000 new cases and about 660 deaths in a day.
#BetterDeadandRed!
Comments
-
You know why I just hit the "fuck off" button for your bullshit?
-
Fargo man hit by bus dies of Convid 1984. More at 10!
-
It would be nice if there was a long, Stickied thread relating to All Things Rona so this H dipshit could stop spamming the bored multiple times a day with a copy/paste thread.
Oh, wait...
https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/70684/maximum-carnage-week-game-thread#latest -
I think I’ve tried to help you on this before, but you’ve missed it or are deliberately being obtuse. You consistently employ a statistical fallacy called the Extrapolation Error. There are far too many variables at play when comparing a small population in one region to a large one in a different region. It’s part and parcel of the lefts’ “one-size-fits-all” thinking.HHusky said:https://www.valleynewslive.com/2020/10/30/1357-new-covid-cases-13-more-deaths-in-north-dakota/
This would be the proportional equivalent of California having more than 70,000 new cases and about 660 deaths in a day.
#BetterDeadandRed!
If North Dakota reported 13 deaths from lutefisk poisoning would you extrapolate this to 660 lutefisk poisoning deaths in CA? When using very small numbers from a small population one can’t responsibly make predictions about the same experience in a large population. Demographics, culture, economics, social norms, etc. are all way too different. -
I want to care what the answer is, but I can't.Sledog said:You know why I just hit the "fuck off" button for your bullshit?
-
It's just proportions. Undeniably true.SkipBoyd said:
I think I’ve tried to help you on this before, but you’ve missed it or are deliberately being obtuse. You consistently employ a statistical fallacy called the Extrapolation Error. There are far too many variables at play when comparing a small population in one region to a large one in a different region. It’s part and parcel of the lefts’ “one-size-fits-all” thinking.HHusky said:https://www.valleynewslive.com/2020/10/30/1357-new-covid-cases-13-more-deaths-in-north-dakota/
This would be the proportional equivalent of California having more than 70,000 new cases and about 660 deaths in a day.
#BetterDeadandRed!
If North Dakota reported 13 deaths from lutefisk poisoning would you extrapolate this to 660 lutefisk poisoning deaths in CA? When using very small numbers from a small population one can’t responsibly make predictions about the same experience in a large population. Demographics, culture, economics, social norms, etc. are all way too different.
Nobody is stopping you from offering a cultural explanation for why the Dakotas are among the most infected places on the planet. -
I like how you attempt to use proportions within the US to make your points about North fucking Dakota while ignoring all of the proportions I have provided you which show the US vastly outperforming Europe.HHusky said:
It's just proportions. Undeniably true.SkipBoyd said:
I think I’ve tried to help you on this before, but you’ve missed it or are deliberately being obtuse. You consistently employ a statistical fallacy called the Extrapolation Error. There are far too many variables at play when comparing a small population in one region to a large one in a different region. It’s part and parcel of the lefts’ “one-size-fits-all” thinking.HHusky said:https://www.valleynewslive.com/2020/10/30/1357-new-covid-cases-13-more-deaths-in-north-dakota/
This would be the proportional equivalent of California having more than 70,000 new cases and about 660 deaths in a day.
#BetterDeadandRed!
If North Dakota reported 13 deaths from lutefisk poisoning would you extrapolate this to 660 lutefisk poisoning deaths in CA? When using very small numbers from a small population one can’t responsibly make predictions about the same experience in a large population. Demographics, culture, economics, social norms, etc. are all way too different.
Nobody is stopping you from offering a cultural explanation for why the Dakotas are among the most infected places on the planet. -
You know "outperforming" in the context of a pandemic is having fewer cases, not more. Don't you?BleachedAnusDawg said:
I like how you attempt to use proportions within the US to make your points about North fucking Dakota while ignoring all of the proportions I have provided you which show the US vastly outperforming Europe.HHusky said:
It's just proportions. Undeniably true.SkipBoyd said:
I think I’ve tried to help you on this before, but you’ve missed it or are deliberately being obtuse. You consistently employ a statistical fallacy called the Extrapolation Error. There are far too many variables at play when comparing a small population in one region to a large one in a different region. It’s part and parcel of the lefts’ “one-size-fits-all” thinking.HHusky said:https://www.valleynewslive.com/2020/10/30/1357-new-covid-cases-13-more-deaths-in-north-dakota/
This would be the proportional equivalent of California having more than 70,000 new cases and about 660 deaths in a day.
#BetterDeadandRed!
If North Dakota reported 13 deaths from lutefisk poisoning would you extrapolate this to 660 lutefisk poisoning deaths in CA? When using very small numbers from a small population one can’t responsibly make predictions about the same experience in a large population. Demographics, culture, economics, social norms, etc. are all way too different.
Nobody is stopping you from offering a cultural explanation for why the Dakotas are among the most infected places on the planet. -
North Dakota has fewer cases than California.HHusky said:
You know "outperforming" in the context of a pandemic is having fewer cases, not more. Don't you?BleachedAnusDawg said:
I like how you attempt to use proportions within the US to make your points about North fucking Dakota while ignoring all of the proportions I have provided you which show the US vastly outperforming Europe.HHusky said:
It's just proportions. Undeniably true.SkipBoyd said:
I think I’ve tried to help you on this before, but you’ve missed it or are deliberately being obtuse. You consistently employ a statistical fallacy called the Extrapolation Error. There are far too many variables at play when comparing a small population in one region to a large one in a different region. It’s part and parcel of the lefts’ “one-size-fits-all” thinking.HHusky said:https://www.valleynewslive.com/2020/10/30/1357-new-covid-cases-13-more-deaths-in-north-dakota/
This would be the proportional equivalent of California having more than 70,000 new cases and about 660 deaths in a day.
#BetterDeadandRed!
If North Dakota reported 13 deaths from lutefisk poisoning would you extrapolate this to 660 lutefisk poisoning deaths in CA? When using very small numbers from a small population one can’t responsibly make predictions about the same experience in a large population. Demographics, culture, economics, social norms, etc. are all way too different.
Nobody is stopping you from offering a cultural explanation for why the Dakotas are among the most infected places on the planet.
Thanks for making my point for me. Tell me more about number of cases being the correct metric to use when comparing a country with 330 million people versus one with 10 million people. -
Click bait headline, clickbait poster
