It’s Barrett....(Democrat Hysteria Game Thread)

creepycoug said:

Sledog said:

creepycoug said:

Sledog said:

Sledog said:

creepycoug said:

PurpleThrobber said:

She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

But the Cuban chick is a Cuban chick. That might have appeased the Floridas, but as we’ve seen here on HCH, not everyone can distinguish among the Hispanos, and among those that can, many don’t care. Reasonable amounts.

Picking the non-ethnic conservative, while considering the ethnic one was the smart move.

I’ll note that both selections are out of step with the traditional academic elitism that accompanies SCOTUS appointments. Harvard, Yale and Stanford, undergrad and law school, have traditionally dominated the appointment pools.

The Cuban woman went to Columbia LS, which is up there too and way better than Notre Dame, but went to FIU undergrad, which is very low brow.

Barrett was undergrad at Rhodes College, not exactly a tippy top liberal arts college, and Notre Dame LS, which is not elite. #26 in USNWR, current ranking, is even higher than it’s been historically. It’s not even Georgetown. Top law firms don’t interview there.

Way Moore Catholic Highspanics than just Cuban. Gong for the big win.

Barrett has broader appeal is my guess as to why she was picked.

That’s essentially what I said.

Why do you think she has “broader appeal”?

Married, female, mother, Catholic, good reputation, highly thought of among the legal crowd, mixed family etc. Appeals across some racial lines due to her religion and adoption. Traditional interpretation of the constitution. Pro life.

Lagoa is married, no less Catholic than Barrett, has three kids, serves on a federal court of appeals, served on the FL SC, and spent time in private practice.

She also made it to the Ivy League with no affirmative action - I know this because she is my age and we attended LS at the same time. I know first hand that the law schools, especially those in the east, don’t consider Cubans as diversity candidates. Dean of admissions at Michigan told me that point blank.

So I ask you again: why does Barrett have broader appeal? They seem like almost the same people. Only real differences are Barrett taught in LS and the Cuban has a better LS pedigree and served in her state’s Supreme Court.

creepycoug said:

Sledog said:

Sledog said:

creepycoug said:

PurpleThrobber said:

She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

But the Cuban chick is a Cuban chick. That might have appeased the Floridas, but as we’ve seen here on HCH, not everyone can distinguish among the Hispanos, and among those that can, many don’t care. Reasonable amounts.

Picking the non-ethnic conservative, while considering the ethnic one was the smart move.

I’ll note that both selections are out of step with the traditional academic elitism that accompanies SCOTUS appointments. Harvard, Yale and Stanford, undergrad and law school, have traditionally dominated the appointment pools.

The Cuban woman went to Columbia LS, which is up there too and way better than Notre Dame, but went to FIU undergrad, which is very low brow.

Barrett was undergrad at Rhodes College, not exactly a tippy top liberal arts college, and Notre Dame LS, which is not elite. #26 in USNWR, current ranking, is even higher than it’s been historically. It’s not even Georgetown. Top law firms don’t interview there.

Way Moore Catholic Highspanics than just Cuban. Gong for the big win.

Barrett has broader appeal is my guess as to why she was picked.

That’s essentially what I said.

Why do you think she has “broader appeal”?

creepycoug said:

Goduckies said:

creepycoug said:

Sledog said:

Sledog said:

creepycoug said:

PurpleThrobber said:

She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

But the Cuban chick is a Cuban chick. That might have appeased the Floridas, but as we’ve seen here on HCH, not everyone can distinguish among the Hispanos, and among those that can, many don’t care. Reasonable amounts.

Picking the non-ethnic conservative, while considering the ethnic one was the smart move.

I’ll note that both selections are out of step with the traditional academic elitism that accompanies SCOTUS appointments. Harvard, Yale and Stanford, undergrad and law school, have traditionally dominated the appointment pools.

The Cuban woman went to Columbia LS, which is up there too and way better than Notre Dame, but went to FIU undergrad, which is very low brow.

Barrett was undergrad at Rhodes College, not exactly a tippy top liberal arts college, and Notre Dame LS, which is not elite. #26 in USNWR, current ranking, is even higher than it’s been historically. It’s not even Georgetown. Top law firms don’t interview there.

Way Moore Catholic Highspanics than just Cuban. Gong for the big win.

Barrett has broader appeal is my guess as to why she was picked.

That’s essentially what I said.

Why do you think she has “broader appeal”?

Had 5 kids and catholic makes it possible to stay independent votes if they trash her too hard

JFC you’re worse than Sleddy. What are you writing here? English please.

NorthwestFresh said:

creepycoug said:

EsophagealFeces said:

creepycoug said:

Sledog said:

creepycoug said:

Sledog said:

Sledog said:

creepycoug said:

PurpleThrobber said:

She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

But the Cuban chick is a Cuban chick. That might have appeased the Floridas, but as we’ve seen here on HCH, not everyone can distinguish among the Hispanos, and among those that can, many don’t care. Reasonable amounts.

Picking the non-ethnic conservative, while considering the ethnic one was the smart move.

I’ll note that both selections are out of step with the traditional academic elitism that accompanies SCOTUS appointments. Harvard, Yale and Stanford, undergrad and law school, have traditionally dominated the appointment pools.

The Cuban woman went to Columbia LS, which is up there too and way better than Notre Dame, but went to FIU undergrad, which is very low brow.

Barrett was undergrad at Rhodes College, not exactly a tippy top liberal arts college, and Notre Dame LS, which is not elite. #26 in USNWR, current ranking, is even higher than it’s been historically. It’s not even Georgetown. Top law firms don’t interview there.

Way Moore Catholic Highspanics than just Cuban. Gong for the big win.

Barrett has broader appeal is my guess as to why she was picked.

That’s essentially what I said.

Why do you think she has “broader appeal”?

Married, female, mother, Catholic, good reputation, highly thought of among the legal crowd, mixed family etc. Appeals across some racial lines due to her religion and adoption. Traditional interpretation of the constitution. Pro life.

Lagoa is married, no less Catholic than Barrett, has three kids, serves on a federal court of appeals, served on the FL SC, and spent time in private practice.

She also made it to the Ivy League with no affirmative action - I know this because she is my age and we attended LS at the same time. I know first hand that the law schools, especially those in the east, don’t consider Cubans as diversity candidates. Dean of admissions at Michigan told me that point blank.

So I ask you again: why does Barrett have broader appeal? They seem like almost the same people. Only real differences are Barrett taught in LS and the Cuban has a better LS pedigree and served in her state’s Supreme Court.

Barrett has a better track record on the 2nd amendment. Good enough for me. Not that Lagoa is bad on it, she just doesn’t have a track record if ruling on it.

Ah the one issue litmus test. I thought only the liberals did that.

Anyway, still would like to know why Barrett has broader appeal. Not everyone is looking for a 2A hawk. And Lagoa is conservative enough that she’d be a pretty safe bet on that one critical issue.

For such a big time attorney, I’d expect you to know that even if Roe is overturned, all it does is put the issue of abortion back to state law. It doesn’t ban abortion.

Guessing you’re a corporate attorney who writes a lot of filler in your briefs to sound smart.

Goduckies said:

creepycoug said:

Sledog said:

Sledog said:

creepycoug said:

PurpleThrobber said:

She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

But the Cuban chick is a Cuban chick. That might have appeased the Floridas, but as we’ve seen here on HCH, not everyone can distinguish among the Hispanos, and among those that can, many don’t care. Reasonable amounts.

Picking the non-ethnic conservative, while considering the ethnic one was the smart move.

I’ll note that both selections are out of step with the traditional academic elitism that accompanies SCOTUS appointments. Harvard, Yale and Stanford, undergrad and law school, have traditionally dominated the appointment pools.

The Cuban woman went to Columbia LS, which is up there too and way better than Notre Dame, but went to FIU undergrad, which is very low brow.

Barrett was undergrad at Rhodes College, not exactly a tippy top liberal arts college, and Notre Dame LS, which is not elite. #26 in USNWR, current ranking, is even higher than it’s been historically. It’s not even Georgetown. Top law firms don’t interview there.

Way Moore Catholic Highspanics than just Cuban. Gong for the big win.

Barrett has broader appeal is my guess as to why she was picked.

That’s essentially what I said.

Why do you think she has “broader appeal”?

Had 5 kids and catholic makes it possible to stay independent votes if they trash her too hard

creepycoug said:

Goduckies said:

creepycoug said:

Sledog said:

Sledog said:

creepycoug said:

PurpleThrobber said:

She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

But the Cuban chick is a Cuban chick. That might have appeased the Floridas, but as we’ve seen here on HCH, not everyone can distinguish among the Hispanos, and among those that can, many don’t care. Reasonable amounts.

Picking the non-ethnic conservative, while considering the ethnic one was the smart move.

I’ll note that both selections are out of step with the traditional academic elitism that accompanies SCOTUS appointments. Harvard, Yale and Stanford, undergrad and law school, have traditionally dominated the appointment pools.

The Cuban woman went to Columbia LS, which is up there too and way better than Notre Dame, but went to FIU undergrad, which is very low brow.

Barrett was undergrad at Rhodes College, not exactly a tippy top liberal arts college, and Notre Dame LS, which is not elite. #26 in USNWR, current ranking, is even higher than it’s been historically. It’s not even Georgetown. Top law firms don’t interview there.

Way Moore Catholic Highspanics than just Cuban. Gong for the big win.

Barrett has broader appeal is my guess as to why she was picked.

That’s essentially what I said.

Why do you think she has “broader appeal”?

Had 5 kids and catholic makes it possible to stay independent votes if they trash her too hard

JFC you’re worse than Sleddy. What are you writing here? English please.

Sorry meant steal independent votes