Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

It’s Barrett....(Democrat Hysteria Game Thread)

thechatch
thechatch Member Posts: 7,232 Standard Supporter
edited September 2020 in Tug Tavern


Watching the DNC twist itself into pretzels trying to make her look like a Nazi should be fun....

Here’s the thread to track the fuckery.

«13456712

Comments

  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    thechatch said:



    Watching the DNC twist itself into pretzels trying to make her look like a Nazi should be fun....

    Here’s the thread to track the fuckery.

    She's involved in the slave trade. So its obvious
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited September 2020
    This is the Anti-Racist author that is required reading with book group discussion for all Wa teachers, allegedly
    https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/26/anticapitalist-sponsored-by-twitter-ceo-accuses-amy-coney-barrett-of-colonialism-for-adopting-from-haiti/
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,784 Standard Supporter
    Ford will claim ACB helped hold her down....
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    I’m hearing People for Praise is a cult.

    That’s the line of attack other than RBG’s “dying wish” that could have been realized had she retired like Anthony Kennedy did when his party had the WH and the Senate. Had Ginsburg retired anytime prior to 2015 Obama and a Dem Senate would have confirmed her successor. Nope, had to ride it out until the end.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,083
    She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

    Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,918 Founders Club
    @dnc will bully her mercilessly
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    of the Coney Island Barrett’s?
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    New line of attack. She’s not enough of a Handmaiden and should be home raising kids like a proper woman.

    Love that ratio!

  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    She adopted Haitian orphans for props is what I’m hearing.

    If Democrats use these deranged attacks in hearings, they lose the House.


  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Elena Kagan was never a judge before Obama appointed her and the Senate but that doesn’t matter now to Blue-check Brenda. This person is just full of hot takes.

  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,163

    New line of attack. She’s not enough of a Handmaiden and should be home raising kids like a proper woman.

    Love that ratio!

    She adopted Haitian orphans for props is what I’m hearing.

    If Democrats use these deranged attacks in hearings, they lose the House.


    Jesus. These people are sick in the head. Fucking pathetic.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Dazzler, are ACB's black children "props?" Using your standard, she had them with her and she didn't let them speak so using the Dazzler standard, they are props, correct?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Look at those fucking little props.


  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,232 Standard Supporter

    She adopted Haitian orphans for props is what I’m hearing.

    If Democrats use these deranged attacks in hearings, they lose the House.


    lol She’s already made her Twitter private.

    Also, it’s “Down’s Syndrome”, you fucking cunt.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Commanders, prepare for the Ceremony.

    Blessed be the fruit.
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,788 Swaye's Wigwam
    It will be fun next week

    Headlines From RCP


    They balance a politico attack with an article attacking the politico article. I included two of the Latino vote pro/anti Trump articles in the screen shot - I thought that was funny.

    here is the politico article link (didn't read only headlines here)

    https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/09/24/supreme-courtreligious-beliefs-420863

    and the NY Post article on the politico article

    https://nypost.com/2020/09/24/politicos-pretentious-error-filled-hit-against-amy-coney-barrett/

    Of course both articles are dated 2 days before the pick (not the infamous Oregon pick)
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047

    She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

    Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

    But the Cuban chick is a Cuban chick. That might have appeased the Floridas, but as we’ve seen here on HCH, not everyone can distinguish among the Hispanos, and among those that can, many don’t care. Reasonable amounts.

    Picking the non-ethnic conservative, while considering the ethnic one was the smart move.

    I’ll note that both selections are out of step with the traditional academic elitism that accompanies SCOTUS appointments. Harvard, Yale and Stanford, undergrad and law school, have traditionally dominated the appointment pools.

    The Cuban woman went to Columbia LS, which is up there too and way better than Notre Dame, but went to FIU undergrad, which is very low brow.

    Barrett was undergrad at Rhodes College, not exactly a tippy top liberal arts college, and Notre Dame LS, which is not elite. #26 in USNWR, current ranking, is even higher than it’s been historically. It’s not even Georgetown. Top law firms don’t interview there.



  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,083

    She adopted Haitian orphans for props is what I’m hearing.

    If Democrats use these deranged attacks in hearings, they lose the House.


    You know they will. They can’t help themselves.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972

    She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

    Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

    But the Cuban chick is a Cuban chick. That might have appeased the Floridas, but as we’ve seen here on HCH, not everyone can distinguish among the Hispanos, and among those that can, many don’t care. Reasonable amounts.

    Picking the non-ethnic conservative, while considering the ethnic one was the smart move.

    I’ll note that both selections are out of step with the traditional academic elitism that accompanies SCOTUS appointments. Harvard, Yale and Stanford, undergrad and law school, have traditionally dominated the appointment pools.

    The Cuban woman went to Columbia LS, which is up there too and way better than Notre Dame, but went to FIU undergrad, which is very low brow.

    Barrett was undergrad at Rhodes College, not exactly a tippy top liberal arts college, and Notre Dame LS, which is not elite. #26 in USNWR, current ranking, is even higher than it’s been historically. It’s not even Georgetown. Top law firms don’t interview there.



    “Top” law firms are the epitome of systemic racism. Rich white kids along with a lot of Affirmative-action JDs who should have gone to Notre Dame based on merit. Have you ever read Michelle Obama’s Princeton thesis? It’s not even AP high school writing.



  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Have you ever read Michelle Obama’s Princeton thesis?

    The late Christopher Hitchens take on Michelle Obama's thesis.

    I direct your attention to Mrs. Obama’s 1985 thesis at Princeton University. Its title (rather limited in scope, given the author and the campus) is ‘Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community.’ To describe it as hard to read would be a mistake; the thesis cannot be ‘read’ at all, in the strict sense of the verb. This is because it wasn’t written in any known language.

    I miss Hitch, in Michelle's defense because I'm know for my fairness, I'd be embarrassed if anyone were to read something I had written when I was in college.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,784 Standard Supporter

    She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

    Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

    But the Cuban chick is a Cuban chick. That might have appeased the Floridas, but as we’ve seen here on HCH, not everyone can distinguish among the Hispanos, and among those that can, many don’t care. Reasonable amounts.

    Picking the non-ethnic conservative, while considering the ethnic one was the smart move.

    I’ll note that both selections are out of step with the traditional academic elitism that accompanies SCOTUS appointments. Harvard, Yale and Stanford, undergrad and law school, have traditionally dominated the appointment pools.

    The Cuban woman went to Columbia LS, which is up there too and way better than Notre Dame, but went to FIU undergrad, which is very low brow.

    Barrett was undergrad at Rhodes College, not exactly a tippy top liberal arts college, and Notre Dame LS, which is not elite. #26 in USNWR, current ranking, is even higher than it’s been historically. It’s not even Georgetown. Top law firms don’t interview there.



    Way Moore Catholic Highspanics than just Cuban. Gong for the big win.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    SFGbob said:

    Have you ever read Michelle Obama’s Princeton thesis?

    The late Christopher Hitchens take on Michelle Obama's thesis.

    I direct your attention to Mrs. Obama’s 1985 thesis at Princeton University. Its title (rather limited in scope, given the author and the campus) is ‘Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community.’ To describe it as hard to read would be a mistake; the thesis cannot be ‘read’ at all, in the strict sense of the verb. This is because it wasn’t written in any known language.

    I miss Hitch, in Michelle's defense because I'm know for my fairness, I'd be embarrassed if anyone were to read something I had written when I was in college.

    This. I wouldn’t want Hitch to read anything I wrote today. Outta my league.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    Sledog said:

    She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

    Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

    But the Cuban chick is a Cuban chick. That might have appeased the Floridas, but as we’ve seen here on HCH, not everyone can distinguish among the Hispanos, and among those that can, many don’t care. Reasonable amounts.

    Picking the non-ethnic conservative, while considering the ethnic one was the smart move.

    I’ll note that both selections are out of step with the traditional academic elitism that accompanies SCOTUS appointments. Harvard, Yale and Stanford, undergrad and law school, have traditionally dominated the appointment pools.

    The Cuban woman went to Columbia LS, which is up there too and way better than Notre Dame, but went to FIU undergrad, which is very low brow.

    Barrett was undergrad at Rhodes College, not exactly a tippy top liberal arts college, and Notre Dame LS, which is not elite. #26 in USNWR, current ranking, is even higher than it’s been historically. It’s not even Georgetown. Top law firms don’t interview there.



    Way Moore Catholic Highspanics than just Cuban. Gong for the big win.
    No idea what you’re saying here Sleddy. English.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047

    She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

    Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

    But the Cuban chick is a Cuban chick. That might have appeased the Floridas, but as we’ve seen here on HCH, not everyone can distinguish among the Hispanos, and among those that can, many don’t care. Reasonable amounts.

    Picking the non-ethnic conservative, while considering the ethnic one was the smart move.

    I’ll note that both selections are out of step with the traditional academic elitism that accompanies SCOTUS appointments. Harvard, Yale and Stanford, undergrad and law school, have traditionally dominated the appointment pools.

    The Cuban woman went to Columbia LS, which is up there too and way better than Notre Dame, but went to FIU undergrad, which is very low brow.

    Barrett was undergrad at Rhodes College, not exactly a tippy top liberal arts college, and Notre Dame LS, which is not elite. #26 in USNWR, current ranking, is even higher than it’s been historically. It’s not even Georgetown. Top law firms don’t interview there.



    “Top” law firms are the epitome of systemic racism. Rich white kids along with a lot of Affirmative-action JDs who should have gone to Notre Dame based on merit. Have you ever read Michelle Obama’s Princeton thesis? It’s not even AP high school writing.



    Not sure I’m following you here. What does this have to do with my post?
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited September 2020
    SFGbob said:

    Have you ever read Michelle Obama’s Princeton thesis?

    The late Christopher Hitchens take on Michelle Obama's thesis.

    I direct your attention to Mrs. Obama’s 1985 thesis at Princeton University. Its title (rather limited in scope, given the author and the campus) is ‘Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community.’ To describe it as hard to read would be a mistake; the thesis cannot be ‘read’ at all, in the strict sense of the verb. This is because it wasn’t written in any known language.

    I miss Hitch, in Michelle's defense because I'm know for my fairness, I'd be embarrassed if anyone were to read something I had written when I was in college.

    I have a published paper from college and I went to a “state” school in Eugene. It’s not that difficult to write a research thesis as I’m obviously no genius.

    Michelle Obama is a community college level intellect. Her disaster of a thesis was at Princeton, which I once thought was for only the top-tied of intellectual students. An embarrassment.
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 7,966 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2020
    Sledog said:

    She’s Catholic. The DNC are atheists and will throw everything they’ve got against her Catholism

    Way to alienate the Hispanic vote who are almost entirely Catholic, DNC

    But the Cuban chick is a Cuban chick. That might have appeased the Floridas, but as we’ve seen here on HCH, not everyone can distinguish among the Hispanos, and among those that can, many don’t care. Reasonable amounts.

    Picking the non-ethnic conservative, while considering the ethnic one was the smart move.

    I’ll note that both selections are out of step with the traditional academic elitism that accompanies SCOTUS appointments. Harvard, Yale and Stanford, undergrad and law school, have traditionally dominated the appointment pools.

    The Cuban woman went to Columbia LS, which is up there too and way better than Notre Dame, but went to FIU undergrad, which is very low brow.

    Barrett was undergrad at Rhodes College, not exactly a tippy top liberal arts college, and Notre Dame LS, which is not elite. #26 in USNWR, current ranking, is even higher than it’s been historically. It’s not even Georgetown. Top law firms don’t interview there.



    Way Moore Catholic Highspanics than just Cuban. Gong for the big win.
    Plus seing the democrats bash her catholicism as well will turn off some independents