Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Not a parody
Comments
-
Notice The Racist @HHusky doesn’t deny that Sanger was an advocate for eugenics targeted at “Negros.”HHusky said:
The thesis here was that she believed in genocide. You gals really need to summon some facts.Bendintheriver said:
She was a blatant racist.HHusky said:
She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.Bendintheriver said:Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.
In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
What HH is doing is denying the truth. Its what all rats do when history is not on their side. They do it with the KKK, they do it with segregationists (the commonly used lie that all segregationists switched parties in 1964), they do it when white supremacists say they are voting for democrats, when trying to say that FDR was all for going to war in WWII, that BO handled the economy masterfully, etc. etc.
Sickening. -
She did. You need to read the shit she wrote.HHusky said:
The thesis here was that she believed in genocide. You gals really need to summon some facts.Bendintheriver said:
She was a blatant racist.HHusky said:
She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.Bendintheriver said:Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.
In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
What HH is doing is denying the truth. Its what all rats do when history is not on their side. They do it with the KKK, they do it with segregationists (the commonly used lie that all segregationists switched parties in 1964), they do it when white supremacists say they are voting for democrats, when trying to say that FDR was all for going to war in WWII, that BO handled the economy masterfully, etc. etc. -
Come watch HHusky struggle in every thread.
-
Swaye said:
Come watch HHusky struggle in every thread.
-
Are you saying HETAR is the new SEBAR?Swaye said:Come watch HHusky struggle in every thread.
-
For instance?Sledog said:
She did. You need to read the shit she wrote.HHusky said:
The thesis here was that she believed in genocide. You gals really need to summon some facts.Bendintheriver said:
She was a blatant racist.HHusky said:
She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.Bendintheriver said:Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.
In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
What HH is doing is denying the truth. Its what all rats do when history is not on their side. They do it with the KKK, they do it with segregationists (the commonly used lie that all segregationists switched parties in 1964), they do it when white supremacists say they are voting for democrats, when trying to say that FDR was all for going to war in WWII, that BO handled the economy masterfully, etc. etc. -
She even presented at a Ku Klux Klan rally in 1926 in Silver Lake, N.J. She recounted this event in her autobiography: "I accepted an invitation to talk to the women's branch of the Ku Klux Klan ... I saw through the door dim figures parading with banners and illuminated crosses ... I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak ... In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered" (Margaret Sanger, "An Autobiography," Page 366).HHusky said:
For instance?Sledog said:
She did. You need to read the shit she wrote.HHusky said:
The thesis here was that she believed in genocide. You gals really need to summon some facts.Bendintheriver said:
She was a blatant racist.HHusky said:
She believed in eugenics. Just like TR and Winston Churchill. You gals are arguing she believed in genocide, which isn’t the same thing.Bendintheriver said:Sanger's racist beliefs are really hard for rats to talk around.
In any event, I guess you’ll be supportive of the movement to rename the Jefferson Memorial.
What HH is doing is denying the truth. Its what all rats do when history is not on their side. They do it with the KKK, they do it with segregationists (the commonly used lie that all segregationists switched parties in 1964), they do it when white supremacists say they are voting for democrats, when trying to say that FDR was all for going to war in WWII, that BO handled the economy masterfully, etc. etc.
In a letter to Clarence Gable in 1939, Sanger wrote: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members" (Margaret Sanger commenting on the 'Negro Project' in a letter to Gamble, Dec. 10, 1939).
"The main objects of the Population Congress would be to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring[;] to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization." ("A Plan for Peace," 1932).
"While I personally believe in the sterilization of the feeble-minded, the insane and syphilitic, I have not been able to discover that these measures are more than superficial deterrents when applied to the constantly growing stream of the unfit. They are excellent means of meeting a certain phase of the situation, but I believe in regard to these, as in regard to other eugenic means, that they do not go to the bottom of the matter." ("Birth Control and Racial Betterment," Feb. 1919, The Birth Control Review).
"The main objects of the Population Congress would be to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring[;] to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization." ("A Plan for Peace," 1932).
30 seconds. You are a shitty fucking paralegal. -
“In April of 1933, The [Birth Control] Review [Margaret Sanger’s magazine], published a shocking article entitled “Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need”. It was written by Margaret’s close friend and advisor, Ernst Rudin, who was then serving as Hitler’s Director of Genetic Sterilization and had earlier taken a role in the establishment in the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene. Later in June of that same year, [The Birth Control Review] published an article by Leon Whitney entitled, “Selective Sterilization”, which adamantly praised and defended The Third Reich’s pre-holocaust race purification programs.”
Sanger openly advocated for eugenics. In her book, “The Pivot of Civilization”, she says, “Eugenics suggests the reestablishment of the balance between the ‘fit’ and the ‘unfit.’ The birth-rate among the … finer stocks of humanity is to be increased by awakening among the ‘fit’ the realization of the dangers of a lessened birth-rate in proportion to the reckless breeding of the ‘unfit.’ (The Pivot of Civilization by Margaret Sanger, Ch. VIII, paragraph 12.) . From this type of writing, she became dubbed by the awareness concerning her advocacy, which hailed as “More children from the fit, less from the unfit.”
"To give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation [concentration camps] or sterilization", advocated the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger in April 1932 ("A Plan For Peace", Birth Control Review; see 'appendix' for this full unabridged seminal article). Which country pioneered forced sterilization in the 20th century, Germany or the United States of America? The German program began in January 1934, but the U.S. state of Indiana passed a forced sterilization law (for mental defectives) in 1907 (when Adolf Hitler was 18 years old). Before the German program began, at least seventeen U.S. states (including California) had 'forced sterilization' laws. Before 1930 there were 200-600 forced sterilizations per year (in the U.S.A.) but in the 1930s the rate jumped to 2,000-4,000 per year. (1)
Who 'Inspired' the architects of the German Sterilization law?
"The leaders in the German sterilization movement state repeatedly that their legislation was formulated after careful study of the California experiment as reported by Mr. Gosney and Dr. [Paul] Popenoe. It would have been impossible, they say, to understake such a venture involving some 1 million people without drawing heavily upon previous experience elsewhere." (2) Who is Dr. Paul Popenoe? He was a leader in the U.S. eugenics movement and wrote (1933) the article 'Eugenic Sterilization' in the journal (BCR) that Margaret Sanger started. How many Americans did Dr. Popenoe estimate should be subjected to sterilization? Between five million and ten million Americans. "The situation [in the U.S.A] will grow worse instead of better if steps are not taken to control the reproduction of mentally handicapped. Eugenic sterilization represents one such step that is practicable, humanitarian, and certain in its results." (3) -
But again, Mall Cop, GENOCIDE was the claim. Sterilizing the unfit was mainstream US policy for decades. The “unfit” isn’t a race.
-
And advocating contraception at a Klan women’s gathering isn’t exactly great proof of the desire to “exterminate the Negro”.HHusky said:But again, Mall Cop, GENOCIDE was the claim. Sterilizing the unfit was mainstream US policy for decades. The “unfit” isn’t a race.
