Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Breakout Players
Comments
-
Feeney is a good call, I think he'll be on a mission to get on the radar again.
Though it's hard to know how CP / PK will deploy him since he was limited in the spring, I'm expecting big things from Corey Littleton. Maybe Andrew Hudson will take some of his snaps on early downs but I love his pass-rushing potential and he can drop into coverage as well.
On offense and with the news that String is transferring, I have to think Darrell Daniels will be featured more in some capacity. I like what Perkins brings to the table as well and those two are the only viable options on the roster to replace the size of String over 2014 and 2015.TTJ said:I'm surprised nobody mentioned Feeney.
Wait... -
Like many, I was gonna go John Ross for the offense.
On defense I don't really know the guys who haven't played, so I'm gonna mention Kikaha and Peters. Yes, we all know how good they are, but nobody outside UW knows that yet. I think this year they become recognized at the Pac-12 and maybe even national level.
One of the local journalists tweeted that Kikaha was the NCAA player with the most QB pressures last season together with Aaron Donald, who just went in the top half of the 1st round of the draft.
With String leaving, Peters is now my favorite player on the roster. He still has room to improve, and I think will Peterman he will improve. By the end of the season he will be a star. -
Would like to see Shirley/Feeney get more penetration this year.
Wait,what?
-
He was a 4* recruit but after he committed they lowered him to a 3*.He_Needs_More_Time said:He was a 3 star recruit
Oh wait, no one fucking does that.
-
If you axed me this 2 days ago, I would have said String and Shaq.
-
I will go with the OL and DL combined ...
I think by the end of the year, we'll look at these units as the best combined trench units in the conference. -
Very bold. I don't see it myself.Tequilla said:I will go with the OL and DL combined ...
I think by the end of the year, we'll look at these units as the best combined trench units in the conference. -
Then we are about to have a monster year if this bears fruit.Tequilla said:I will go with the OL and DL combined ...
I think by the end of the year, we'll look at these units as the best combined trench units in the conference. -
I buy it. On paper, UW has the best lines of any team in the conference.RoadDawg55 said:
Very bold. I don't see it myself.Tequilla said:I will go with the OL and DL combined ...
I think by the end of the year, we'll look at these units as the best combined trench units in the conference. -
Maybe if you combine them, they are at the top. Oregon has their OL returning, and it's better than ours. On paper, UCLA had a good DL, bad OL. Same with USC. Stanford has to replace a lot of guys. ASU too.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I buy it. On paper, UW has the best lines of any team in the conference.RoadDawg55 said:
Very bold. I don't see it myself.Tequilla said:I will go with the OL and DL combined ...
I think by the end of the year, we'll look at these units as the best combined trench units in the conference.
I expect an improved OL, but these guys were pretty average last year. The good news is they are all returning, and we don't have Sark and Cozzetto anymore. The DL gets pumped up because of Shelton and Kikaha, but they weren't that great last year. They disappeared in some games, and we got almost no push up the middle. Littleton missed a ton of TFL's too. We'll see if they are the best in the conference. I think it's a pretty bold statement and we need to be much improved for it to be true.
