Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Inside the Mind of Jason Whitlock
Comments
-
Nobody has been harder on Colin Kaepernick than you — what do you say to his supporters today?
Whitlock: What was he right about? That police brutality is bad? I’ve never met anyone who believes police brutality is good. Police brutality is a societal issue that impacts all demographics. Police brutality is an abuse of power and authority. Racializing the discussion of police brutality prevents us from framing the discussion properly and framing it in a way that moves us toward progress. It’s a mistake to trivialize the heinous crime that happened to George Floyd by making it a discussion about a quarterback who used the issue to promote his Nike brand and a signature gym shoe.
That's some pretty good shit right there. Of course we're not allowed to say this. -
SFGbob said:
Nobody has been harder on Colin Kaepernick than you — what do you say to his supporters today?
Whitlock: What was he right about? That police brutality is bad? I’ve never met anyone who believes police brutality is good. Police brutality is a societal issue that impacts all demographics. Police brutality is an abuse of power and authority. Racializing the discussion of police brutality prevents us from framing the discussion properly and framing it in a way that moves us toward progress. It’s a mistake to trivialize the heinous crime that happened to George Floyd by making it a discussion about a quarterback who used the issue to promote his Nike brand and a signature gym shoe.
That's some pretty good shit right there. Of coursewe'rewhite people are not allowed to say this. -
Even black people who say it won't go unscathed.PurpleThrobber said:SFGbob said:Nobody has been harder on Colin Kaepernick than you — what do you say to his supporters today?
Whitlock: What was he right about? That police brutality is bad? I’ve never met anyone who believes police brutality is good. Police brutality is a societal issue that impacts all demographics. Police brutality is an abuse of power and authority. Racializing the discussion of police brutality prevents us from framing the discussion properly and framing it in a way that moves us toward progress. It’s a mistake to trivialize the heinous crime that happened to George Floyd by making it a discussion about a quarterback who used the issue to promote his Nike brand and a signature gym shoe.
That's some pretty good shit right there. Of coursewe'rewhite people are not allowed to say this. -
That is powerful stuff throughout that interview. That guy is locked and loaded. Great interview.
-
Whitlock has paid a heavy price for such opinions before.SFGbob said:
Even black people who say it won't go unscathed.PurpleThrobber said:SFGbob said:Nobody has been harder on Colin Kaepernick than you — what do you say to his supporters today?
Whitlock: What was he right about? That police brutality is bad? I’ve never met anyone who believes police brutality is good. Police brutality is a societal issue that impacts all demographics. Police brutality is an abuse of power and authority. Racializing the discussion of police brutality prevents us from framing the discussion properly and framing it in a way that moves us toward progress. It’s a mistake to trivialize the heinous crime that happened to George Floyd by making it a discussion about a quarterback who used the issue to promote his Nike brand and a signature gym shoe.
That's some pretty good shit right there. Of coursewe'rewhite people are not allowed to say this.
-
Whitlock is a breath of fresh air. When social media started, I had a friend tell me that it would be the end of rational thought, facts and free speech. Facts now get you shamed on social media. My friend was on the money and reminds me of it often.
This part of the article was worth repeating:
Social media, its primary influencers, the blogosphere and the mainstream media all seem determined to promote irrational fear. They seem to want all people emotional and irrational. Irrational and emotional people surrender their rights more easily than rational and non-emotional people. Irrational and emotional people, especially when 40 million of them are newly unemployed, will choose rioting, violence and looting rather than a strategic response to injustice. Irrational and emotional people will unwittingly allow themselves to be used as cover for the violent, destructive behavior of anarchists. Irrational and emotional people will more easily buy propaganda spewed by communist countries trying to destabilize America. -
Yeah, I know. Shows what a lie the left's claim about "diversity" really is.dnc said:
Whitlock has paid a heavy price for such opinions before.SFGbob said:
Even black people who say it won't go unscathed.PurpleThrobber said:SFGbob said:Nobody has been harder on Colin Kaepernick than you — what do you say to his supporters today?
Whitlock: What was he right about? That police brutality is bad? I’ve never met anyone who believes police brutality is good. Police brutality is a societal issue that impacts all demographics. Police brutality is an abuse of power and authority. Racializing the discussion of police brutality prevents us from framing the discussion properly and framing it in a way that moves us toward progress. It’s a mistake to trivialize the heinous crime that happened to George Floyd by making it a discussion about a quarterback who used the issue to promote his Nike brand and a signature gym shoe.
That's some pretty good shit right there. Of coursewe'rewhite people are not allowed to say this. -
Has it nailed.
-
Nothing like listening to Skip Bayless tell Tiger he isn't Black enough
-
Da fuq he isn't. Tiger nails hot white women by the truckload.RaceBannon said:Nothing like listening to Skip Bayless tell Tiger he isn't Black enough
Respect.
-
-
I generally hate Whitlock because he loves the smell of his own farts, but he’s spot on here.
-
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand. -
Pop can go fuck himself. He panders to the league, his players and its fans because he knows which side of his bread is buttered. Same with LeBron and all of them.NorthwestFresh said:
Their lives revolve around a child's game with a rubber ball, for fuck sake. Who gives a righteous fuck about anything they do or say outside the lines? -
Don't start that shit, Bob. You know the disagreement revolves around presumptions and prejudices based on interpretations and inferences from only one side of the story, given the opposing viewpoint was shot dead that night.SFGbob said:
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand.
Arguments are positions and beliefs. They aren't facts. -
Shot dead while bashing Zimmerman’s head against the sidewalk. Trademark wanted to be the tough guy on the “cracker” and ended up getting killed. Boo hoo. Darwinism.TurdBomber said:
Don't start that shit, Bob. You know the disagreement revolves around presumptions and prejudices based on interpretations and inferences from only one side of the story, given the opposing viewpoint was shot dead that night.SFGbob said:
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand.
Arguments are positions and beliefs. They aren't facts. -
The only person between you and me who was citing nothing more than their feelings in regards to the Trademark case was you.TurdBomber said:
Don't start that shit, Bob. You know the disagreement revolves around presumptions and prejudices based on interpretations and inferences from only one side of the story, given the opposing viewpoint was shot dead that night.SFGbob said:
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand.
Arguments are positions and beliefs. They aren't facts. -
But, but the cops told Zimmerman not to chase Trademark, and Zimmerman had his gun drawn while he chased Trademark down a dark alley. And it's perfectly legal to assault someone and bash their head into the sidewalk if you're scared and being followed.NorthwestFresh said:
Shot dead while bashing Zimmerman’s head against the sidewalk. Trademark wanted to be the tough guy on the “cracker” and ended up getting killed. Boo hoo. Darwinism.TurdBomber said:
Don't start that shit, Bob. You know the disagreement revolves around presumptions and prejudices based on interpretations and inferences from only one side of the story, given the opposing viewpoint was shot dead that night.SFGbob said:
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand.
Arguments are positions and beliefs. They aren't facts. -
If I've got a gun, I might not fully resist a guy putting his hands on my head when I know the concealed weapon I'm reaching for will end the matter very quickly.SFGbob said:
The only person between you and me who was citing nothing more than their feelings in regards to the Trademark case was you.TurdBomber said:
Don't start that shit, Bob. You know the disagreement revolves around presumptions and prejudices based on interpretations and inferences from only one side of the story, given the opposing viewpoint was shot dead that night.SFGbob said:
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand.
Arguments are positions and beliefs. They aren't facts.
Maybe if Zimmerman fought with his hands instead of grabbing his gun, his head would've been fine.
I can play the same game as you, Bobby. All day long. -
Maybe isn't a fact. It's a feeling. Never phuck around with a younger faster opponent who suckered punched you. And that land war in Asia thing.
-
And this Kunt actually claims I'm the one who is basing their position on presumptions and opinion. You're not even on the same playing field with me let alone the same game.TurdBomber said:
If I've got a gun, I might not fully resist a guy putting his hands on my head when I know the concealed weapon I'm reaching for will end the matter very quickly.SFGbob said:
The only person between you and me who was citing nothing more than their feelings in regards to the Trademark case was you.TurdBomber said:
Don't start that shit, Bob. You know the disagreement revolves around presumptions and prejudices based on interpretations and inferences from only one side of the story, given the opposing viewpoint was shot dead that night.SFGbob said:
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand.
Arguments are positions and beliefs. They aren't facts.
Maybe if Zimmerman fought with his hands instead of grabbing his gun, his head would've been fine.
I can play the same game as you, Bobby. All day long.
Fact - their was zero physical evidence that Zimmerman ever laid a hand on Trademark and all the physical evidence supported Zimmerman's version of the story. Trademark sucker punched Zimmerman, got him on the ground "MMA style" and proceeded to bash his head into the concrete. Now, how many times does Trademark get to do that to Zimmerman before he can respond with lethal force? -
I've never argued those points, Bob. It's always been about the loser who provoked the encounter. Once it was on, Trayvon fucked up and reacted with aggression when he should've let it go. I've never said differently.SFGbob said:
And this Kunt actually claims I'm the one who is basing their position on presumptions and opinion. You're not even on the same playing field with me let alone the same game.TurdBomber said:
If I've got a gun, I might not fully resist a guy putting his hands on my head when I know the concealed weapon I'm reaching for will end the matter very quickly.SFGbob said:
The only person between you and me who was citing nothing more than their feelings in regards to the Trademark case was you.TurdBomber said:
Don't start that shit, Bob. You know the disagreement revolves around presumptions and prejudices based on interpretations and inferences from only one side of the story, given the opposing viewpoint was shot dead that night.SFGbob said:
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand.
Arguments are positions and beliefs. They aren't facts.
Maybe if Zimmerman fought with his hands instead of grabbing his gun, his head would've been fine.
I can play the same game as you, Bobby. All day long.
Fact - their was zero physical evidence that Zimmerman ever laid a hand on Trademark and all the physical evidence supported Zimmerman's version of the story. Trademark sucker punched Zimmerman, got him on the ground "MMA style" and proceeded to bash his head into the concrete. Now, how many times does Trademark get to do that to Zimmerman before he can respond with lethal force?
What I said is that teenagers make bad judgments, especially when they have a GF on the phone they're trying to impress. As a parent of three, I'm sure you know that.
The original cause for the encounter was the wannabe rent-a-cop's stalking. Once it was on, Trayvon made bad choices.
Hey, I know you're happy there's one less black kid like Trayvon in the world, Bob. It's no secret you hate kids like him with a passion. But that case is a perfect example of what goes wrong with profiling and why people are unhappy about it. Because prejudice can lead to shit like this, even though your hero Zimmerman got away with killing a kid almost half his age.
Perfectly legal in Florida, I know. But it's almost like it might've been better for Zimmerman to just leave the kid alone and let him walk home instead of profiling him as one of the "assholes who always get away with it." -
Yes, please follow the Marquess of Queensbury Rules and keep that gun holstered when a “teenager” decides to go MMA on you.TurdBomber said:
I've never argued those points, Bob. It's always been about the loser who provoked the encounter. Once it was on, Trayvon fucked up and reacted with aggression when he should've let it go. I've never said differently.SFGbob said:
And this Kunt actually claims I'm the one who is basing their position on presumptions and opinion. You're not even on the same playing field with me let alone the same game.TurdBomber said:
If I've got a gun, I might not fully resist a guy putting his hands on my head when I know the concealed weapon I'm reaching for will end the matter very quickly.SFGbob said:
The only person between you and me who was citing nothing more than their feelings in regards to the Trademark case was you.TurdBomber said:
Don't start that shit, Bob. You know the disagreement revolves around presumptions and prejudices based on interpretations and inferences from only one side of the story, given the opposing viewpoint was shot dead that night.SFGbob said:
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand.
Arguments are positions and beliefs. They aren't facts.
Maybe if Zimmerman fought with his hands instead of grabbing his gun, his head would've been fine.
I can play the same game as you, Bobby. All day long.
Fact - their was zero physical evidence that Zimmerman ever laid a hand on Trademark and all the physical evidence supported Zimmerman's version of the story. Trademark sucker punched Zimmerman, got him on the ground "MMA style" and proceeded to bash his head into the concrete. Now, how many times does Trademark get to do that to Zimmerman before he can respond with lethal force?
What I said is that teenagers make bad judgments, especially when they have a GF on the phone they're trying to impress. As a parent of three, I'm sure you know that.
The original cause for the encounter was the wannabe rent-a-cop's stalking. Once it was on, Trayvon made bad choices.
Hey, I know you're happy there's one less black kid like Trayvon in the world, Bob. It's no secret you hate kids like him with a passion. But that case is a perfect example of what goes wrong with profiling and why people are unhappy about it. Because prejudice can lead to shit like this, even though your hero Zimmerman got away with killing a kid almost half his age.
Perfectly legal in Florida, I know. But it's almost like it might've been better for Zimmerman to just leave the kid alone and let him walk home instead of profiling him as one of the "assholes who always get away with it."
Take that ass-kicking you deserve . . . The ass-kicking that may leave you permanently disabled or dead because the “teenager” made some bad decisions.
It might have been better if the “kid” didn’t get expelled from school for ??? and sent by his mother to live with his father and girlfriend.
-
Correct, you never really argued any points. You emoted and you stated your fact free and baseless opinion and misstated the known facts.TurdBomber said:
I've never argued those points, Bob. It's always been about the loser who provoked the encounter. Once it was on, Trayvon fucked up and reacted with aggression when he should've let it go. I've never said differently.SFGbob said:
And this Kunt actually claims I'm the one who is basing their position on presumptions and opinion. You're not even on the same playing field with me let alone the same game.TurdBomber said:
If I've got a gun, I might not fully resist a guy putting his hands on my head when I know the concealed weapon I'm reaching for will end the matter very quickly.SFGbob said:
The only person between you and me who was citing nothing more than their feelings in regards to the Trademark case was you.TurdBomber said:
Don't start that shit, Bob. You know the disagreement revolves around presumptions and prejudices based on interpretations and inferences from only one side of the story, given the opposing viewpoint was shot dead that night.SFGbob said:
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand.
Arguments are positions and beliefs. They aren't facts.
Maybe if Zimmerman fought with his hands instead of grabbing his gun, his head would've been fine.
I can play the same game as you, Bobby. All day long.
Fact - their was zero physical evidence that Zimmerman ever laid a hand on Trademark and all the physical evidence supported Zimmerman's version of the story. Trademark sucker punched Zimmerman, got him on the ground "MMA style" and proceeded to bash his head into the concrete. Now, how many times does Trademark get to do that to Zimmerman before he can respond with lethal force?
What I said is that teenagers make bad judgments, especially when they have a GF on the phone they're trying to impress. As a parent of three, I'm sure you know that.
The original cause for the encounter was the wannabe rent-a-cop's stalking. Once it was on, Trayvon made bad choices.
Hey, I know you're happy there's one less black kid like Trayvon in the world, Bob. It's no secret you hate kids like him with a passion. But that case is a perfect example of what goes wrong with profiling and why people are unhappy about it. Because prejudice can lead to shit like this, even though your hero Zimmerman got away with killing a kid almost half his age.
Perfectly legal in Florida, I know. But it's almost like it might've been better for Zimmerman to just leave the kid alone and let him walk home instead of profiling him as one of the "assholes who always get away with it."
Case in point.
Hey, I know you're happy there's one less black kid like Trayvon in the world, Bob. It's no secret you hate kids like him with a passion. But that case is a perfect example of what goes wrong with profiling and why people are unhappy about it. Because prejudice can lead to shit like this, even though your hero Zimmerman got away with killing a kid almost half his age.
All claims pulled squarely out of your ass. Your claim that Zimmerman got away with it because of Florida law just further reveals that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and are simply restating your fact free feelings.
And thank you for reinforcing my point. It doesn't matter what the facts of this case or the Mike Brown case or the George Floyd case really are, the left has already set the narrative and people like yourself have very, very strong feelings that are impervious to the facts. -
Where did I claim anything because of "Florida Law," Bobby? Self-Defense is always legal. Are you assuming Stand Your Ground was in play? Cause they abandoned that.SFGbob said:
Correct, you never really argued any points. You emoted and you stated your fact free and baseless opinion and misstated the known facts.TurdBomber said:
I've never argued those points, Bob. It's always been about the loser who provoked the encounter. Once it was on, Trayvon fucked up and reacted with aggression when he should've let it go. I've never said differently.SFGbob said:
And this Kunt actually claims I'm the one who is basing their position on presumptions and opinion. You're not even on the same playing field with me let alone the same game.TurdBomber said:
If I've got a gun, I might not fully resist a guy putting his hands on my head when I know the concealed weapon I'm reaching for will end the matter very quickly.SFGbob said:
The only person between you and me who was citing nothing more than their feelings in regards to the Trademark case was you.TurdBomber said:
Don't start that shit, Bob. You know the disagreement revolves around presumptions and prejudices based on interpretations and inferences from only one side of the story, given the opposing viewpoint was shot dead that night.SFGbob said:
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand.
Arguments are positions and beliefs. They aren't facts.
Maybe if Zimmerman fought with his hands instead of grabbing his gun, his head would've been fine.
I can play the same game as you, Bobby. All day long.
Fact - their was zero physical evidence that Zimmerman ever laid a hand on Trademark and all the physical evidence supported Zimmerman's version of the story. Trademark sucker punched Zimmerman, got him on the ground "MMA style" and proceeded to bash his head into the concrete. Now, how many times does Trademark get to do that to Zimmerman before he can respond with lethal force?
What I said is that teenagers make bad judgments, especially when they have a GF on the phone they're trying to impress. As a parent of three, I'm sure you know that.
The original cause for the encounter was the wannabe rent-a-cop's stalking. Once it was on, Trayvon made bad choices.
Hey, I know you're happy there's one less black kid like Trayvon in the world, Bob. It's no secret you hate kids like him with a passion. But that case is a perfect example of what goes wrong with profiling and why people are unhappy about it. Because prejudice can lead to shit like this, even though your hero Zimmerman got away with killing a kid almost half his age.
Perfectly legal in Florida, I know. But it's almost like it might've been better for Zimmerman to just leave the kid alone and let him walk home instead of profiling him as one of the "assholes who always get away with it."
Case in point.
Hey, I know you're happy there's one less black kid like Trayvon in the world, Bob. It's no secret you hate kids like him with a passion. But that case is a perfect example of what goes wrong with profiling and why people are unhappy about it. Because prejudice can lead to shit like this, even though your hero Zimmerman got away with killing a kid almost half his age.
All claims pulled squarely out of your ass. Your claim that Zimmerman got away with it because of Florida law just further reveals that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and are simply restating your fact free feelings.
And thank you for reinforcing my point. It doesn't matter what the facts of this case or the Mike Brown case or the George Floyd case really are, the left has already set the narrative and people like yourself have very, very strong feelings that are impervious to the facts.
Once again, you should actually finish reading a comment before you respond to it.
But I get it. Your keyboard rage gets the best of you.
Take your fucking meds, you fucking psycho. -
Sad when they can't even keep track of the bullshit that comes out of their own mouth.TurdBomber said:
Where did I claim anything because of "Florida Law," Bobby? Self-Defense is always legal. Are you assuming Stand Your Ground was in play? Cause they abandoned that.SFGbob said:
Correct, you never really argued any points. You emoted and you stated your fact free and baseless opinion and misstated the known facts.TurdBomber said:
I've never argued those points, Bob. It's always been about the loser who provoked the encounter. Once it was on, Trayvon fucked up and reacted with aggression when he should've let it go. I've never said differently.SFGbob said:
And this Kunt actually claims I'm the one who is basing their position on presumptions and opinion. You're not even on the same playing field with me let alone the same game.TurdBomber said:
If I've got a gun, I might not fully resist a guy putting his hands on my head when I know the concealed weapon I'm reaching for will end the matter very quickly.SFGbob said:
The only person between you and me who was citing nothing more than their feelings in regards to the Trademark case was you.TurdBomber said:
Don't start that shit, Bob. You know the disagreement revolves around presumptions and prejudices based on interpretations and inferences from only one side of the story, given the opposing viewpoint was shot dead that night.SFGbob said:
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand.
Arguments are positions and beliefs. They aren't facts.
Maybe if Zimmerman fought with his hands instead of grabbing his gun, his head would've been fine.
I can play the same game as you, Bobby. All day long.
Fact - their was zero physical evidence that Zimmerman ever laid a hand on Trademark and all the physical evidence supported Zimmerman's version of the story. Trademark sucker punched Zimmerman, got him on the ground "MMA style" and proceeded to bash his head into the concrete. Now, how many times does Trademark get to do that to Zimmerman before he can respond with lethal force?
What I said is that teenagers make bad judgments, especially when they have a GF on the phone they're trying to impress. As a parent of three, I'm sure you know that.
The original cause for the encounter was the wannabe rent-a-cop's stalking. Once it was on, Trayvon made bad choices.
Hey, I know you're happy there's one less black kid like Trayvon in the world, Bob. It's no secret you hate kids like him with a passion. But that case is a perfect example of what goes wrong with profiling and why people are unhappy about it. Because prejudice can lead to shit like this, even though your hero Zimmerman got away with killing a kid almost half his age.
Perfectly legal in Florida, I know. But it's almost like it might've been better for Zimmerman to just leave the kid alone and let him walk home instead of profiling him as one of the "assholes who always get away with it."
Case in point.
Hey, I know you're happy there's one less black kid like Trayvon in the world, Bob. It's no secret you hate kids like him with a passion. But that case is a perfect example of what goes wrong with profiling and why people are unhappy about it. Because prejudice can lead to shit like this, even though your hero Zimmerman got away with killing a kid almost half his age.
All claims pulled squarely out of your ass. Your claim that Zimmerman got away with it because of Florida law just further reveals that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and are simply restating your fact free feelings.
And thank you for reinforcing my point. It doesn't matter what the facts of this case or the Mike Brown case or the George Floyd case really are, the left has already set the narrative and people like yourself have very, very strong feelings that are impervious to the facts.
Once again, you should actually finish reading a comment before you respond to it.
But I get it. Your keyboard rage gets the best of you.
Take your fucking meds, you fucking psycho.
Perfectly legal in Florida, I know. -
And Zimmerman, of course, knew all this "bad kid" stuff before profiling and stalking Martin, right? Totally relevant, right? I wonder why that stuff is inadmissible in court then. Maybe because it's not relevant, ya think?trublue said:
Yes, please follow the Marquess of Queensbury Rules and keep that gun holstered when a “teenager” decides to go MMA on you.TurdBomber said:
I've never argued those points, Bob. It's always been about the loser who provoked the encounter. Once it was on, Trayvon fucked up and reacted with aggression when he should've let it go. I've never said differently.SFGbob said:
And this Kunt actually claims I'm the one who is basing their position on presumptions and opinion. You're not even on the same playing field with me let alone the same game.TurdBomber said:
If I've got a gun, I might not fully resist a guy putting his hands on my head when I know the concealed weapon I'm reaching for will end the matter very quickly.SFGbob said:
The only person between you and me who was citing nothing more than their feelings in regards to the Trademark case was you.TurdBomber said:
Don't start that shit, Bob. You know the disagreement revolves around presumptions and prejudices based on interpretations and inferences from only one side of the story, given the opposing viewpoint was shot dead that night.SFGbob said:
The same thing will happen with the George Floyd case. You have intelligent people here who still spout the bullshit from the Trademark case. Once the left establishes their narrative it's hard for the truth to prevail.NorthwestFresh said:
This was intentional. Why do you think that Obama never publicly rebuked the members of his own party who were pushing the hands up don't shoot lie? It was too valuable for him politically and it continues to bare fruit for the Rat party to this very day to allow that false narrative to stand.
Arguments are positions and beliefs. They aren't facts.
Maybe if Zimmerman fought with his hands instead of grabbing his gun, his head would've been fine.
I can play the same game as you, Bobby. All day long.
Fact - their was zero physical evidence that Zimmerman ever laid a hand on Trademark and all the physical evidence supported Zimmerman's version of the story. Trademark sucker punched Zimmerman, got him on the ground "MMA style" and proceeded to bash his head into the concrete. Now, how many times does Trademark get to do that to Zimmerman before he can respond with lethal force?
What I said is that teenagers make bad judgments, especially when they have a GF on the phone they're trying to impress. As a parent of three, I'm sure you know that.
The original cause for the encounter was the wannabe rent-a-cop's stalking. Once it was on, Trayvon made bad choices.
Hey, I know you're happy there's one less black kid like Trayvon in the world, Bob. It's no secret you hate kids like him with a passion. But that case is a perfect example of what goes wrong with profiling and why people are unhappy about it. Because prejudice can lead to shit like this, even though your hero Zimmerman got away with killing a kid almost half his age.
Perfectly legal in Florida, I know. But it's almost like it might've been better for Zimmerman to just leave the kid alone and let him walk home instead of profiling him as one of the "assholes who always get away with it."
Take that ass-kicking you deserve . . . The ass-kicking that may leave you permanently disabled or dead because the “teenager” made some bad decisions.
It might have been better if the “kid” didn’t get expelled from school for ??? and sent by his mother to live with his father and girlfriend.
Yeah, yeah, Martin deserved to die because he was suspended from school, right?
Say it with me, gents: P-R-E-J-U-D-I-C-E. Own it, heroes. -
profiling and stalking Martin, right?
Good thing you're dealing in "facts" and not your opinions.
Martin deserved to die because he attacked someone, broke their nose and then smashed their head into the sidewalk. But please return to your worthless opinions.
