Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

paul richardson it is

1235

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,532 Swaye's Wigwam
    dhdawg said:

    lots of handwringing at seahooks.net right now. "there were better WR's on the board."
    Gee, I'm glad you are the experts, because I'm pretty sure if Pete and John had a better available WR on their board they would've taken him.
    I like how everyone listens to Mel Kiper, prisco, etc. say one WR is better than another and they take it as gospel

    It's really weird how prevalent groupthink is with Kiper, McShay, and NFL fans. They hang onto every word. It's fucking stupid. How often do they need to be proven wrong for people to understand that?
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    dhdawg said:

    lots of handwringing at seahooks.net right now. "there were better WR's on the board."
    Gee, I'm glad you are the experts, because I'm pretty sure if Pete and John had a better available WR on their board they would've taken him.
    I like how everyone listens to Mel Kiper, prisco, etc. say one WR is better than another and they take it as gospel

    It's really weird how prevalent groupthink is with Kiper, McShay, and NFL fans. They hang onto every word. It's fucking stupid. How often do they need to be proven wrong for people to understand that?
    You just describe Doogman very accurately.......

    I mean when certain people are consistently wrong perhaps you would start getting your info from someone else.
  • SteveInShelton
    SteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611
    If hooks.net doesn't like it, it must have been a great pick. Those people watch youtube highlights and think they are scouting gurus. Richardson compares to DeSean Jackson, and he can beat defenders deep which is something the Hawks sorely lacked last year. Him and Harvin on the field is going to open up the offense a ton.
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    edited May 2014
    How good would Race's Bruins have been last year if Richardson+Richardson+Shirley had lasted past their first week?
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    TTJ said:

    How good would Race's Bruins have been last year if Richardson+Richardson+Shirley had lasted past their first week?

    RIP

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    TTJ said:

    How good would Race's Bruins have been last year if Richardson+Richardson+Shirley had lasted past their first week?

    Who is Race? Does he post here? Never seen him.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,532 Swaye's Wigwam
    TTJ said:

    How good would Race's Bruins have been last year if Richardson+Richardson+Shirley had lasted past their first week?

    I was thinking the same thing. I bet they would have won at least 2-3 more games the past two years.
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    Mora might have gotten them to the BCS cash game last year. Unless those three saved Rick's job.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,532 Swaye's Wigwam
    TTJ said:

    Mora might have gotten them to the BCS cash game last year. Unless those three saved Rick's job.

    They still probably lose to Stanford and Oregon. Stanford still woul have destroyed UCLA up front, and UCLA needed more than a CB and WR to win at Oregon.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    TTJ said:

    Mora might have gotten them to the BCS cash game last year. Unless those three saved Rick's job.

    They still probably lose to Stanford and Oregon. Stanford still woul have destroyed UCLA up front, and UCLA needed more than a CB and WR to win at Oregon.
    Agreed.

    OTOH, what if UCLA was able to actually develop Shirley? A Shirley with more than one move could have been something of a difference maker.