Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Obama virus?
Sledog
Member Posts: 37,701 
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
Embarassing.
-
It has to be fake
But accurate -
Should be true!RaceBannon said:It has to be fake
But accurate -
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016 -
The photo shows then-President Barack Obama visiting the National Institutes of Health in 2014 along with Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert, and then-Secretary of Health and Human Services Sylvia Burwell. They are listening to Dr. Nancy Sullivan, chief of the Biodefense Research Section of The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.RaceBannon said:It has to be fake
But accurate
THE FACTS: A post circulating on Facebook falsely claims the former president visited an infectious disease lab in Wuhan, China, in 2015, an effort to link Obama to a debunked conspiracy theory that the coronavirus was made in a lab. -
Looks legit. This is big news! Keep working those phones Fleens.
-
The giving of our tax dollars is what's true. Imagine paying a communist country that wants our nation destroyed money to work on a virus they have loosed upon us.
Keep it up lefties. But wouldn't moving to China be more fun? I'll chip in $10.00. -
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right? -
I mean, we could just not given them $55 billion of the Shah governments money to use for terrorism if they want to use it for terroriBennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right? -
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it.
-
This has legs!Sledog said:
-
So, within minutes Race called it fake and it was and now no conservative is pushing it. Unlike mello, the dazzler and IC who are still pushing the Russian collusion hoax.
-
The virus came out of a lab, but as a result of incompetence
-
The photo is fake. Some tax dollars did end up at that actual lab in China, though. That’s factual. ~$600,000 for reasons unknown.WestlinnDuck said:So, within minutes Race called it fake and it was and now no conservative is pushing it. Unlike mello, the dazzler and IC who are still pushing the Russian collusion hoax.
-
Are you DJDuck's retarded son?NorthwestFresh said:
I mean, we could just not given them $55 billion of the Shah governments money to use for terrorism if they want to use it for terroriBennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right? -
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it. -
Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.BennyBeaver said:
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it.
Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact. -
It's called "you have your head so far up your ass you are lacking oxygen to the brain"NorthwestFresh said:
Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.BennyBeaver said:
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it.
Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact. -
As we sayBennyBeaver said:
It's called "you have your head so far up your ass you are lacking oxygen to the brain"NorthwestFresh said:
Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.BennyBeaver said:
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it.
Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact.
Fuck off, Lightweight.
Typical Democrat. Can’t refute the actual proof so it’s Clown Car time. @HHusky, driver needed for your new recruit. -
Typical tugtard. Change the subject, move the goalpost, link grandma memes, link articles and don't read them and if you do don't read for comprehension.NorthwestFresh said:
As we sayBennyBeaver said:
It's called "you have your head so far up your ass you are lacking oxygen to the brain"NorthwestFresh said:
Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.BennyBeaver said:
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it.
Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact.
Fuck off, Lightweight.
Typical Democrat. Can’t refute the actual proof so it’s Clown Car time. @HHusky, driver needed for your new recruit.
could, might, labeled, not likely, etc.
Thanks for playing dullard. -
White flag already? You do really do suck.BennyBeaver said:
Typical tugtard. Change the subject, move the goalpost, link grandma memes, link articles and don't read them and if you do don't read for comprehension.NorthwestFresh said:
As we sayBennyBeaver said:
It's called "you have your head so far up your ass you are lacking oxygen to the brain"NorthwestFresh said:
Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.BennyBeaver said:
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it.
Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact.
Fuck off, Lightweight.
Typical Democrat. Can’t refute the actual proof so it’s Clown Car time. @HHusky, driver needed for your new recruit.
could, might, labeled, not likely, etc.
Thanks for playing dullard.
John Kerry said up to $55 billion of money Obama gave Iran may be used for terrorism. Obama willingly gave the Ayatollah money with no restrictions on it. He probably funded terrorism against the US and other western allies.
You don’t even try to defend it because you can’t. It’s awful and completely helping fund a dictatorship.
He’s lucky to have such loyal brownshirts. It’s because you just aren’t at all intelligent. -
bless your heart. you still can't read the quotes for comprehensionNorthwestFresh said:
White flag already? You do really do suck.BennyBeaver said:
Typical tugtard. Change the subject, move the goalpost, link grandma memes, link articles and don't read them and if you do don't read for comprehension.NorthwestFresh said:
As we sayBennyBeaver said:
It's called "you have your head so far up your ass you are lacking oxygen to the brain"NorthwestFresh said:
Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.BennyBeaver said:
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it.
Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact.
Fuck off, Lightweight.
Typical Democrat. Can’t refute the actual proof so it’s Clown Car time. @HHusky, driver needed for your new recruit.
could, might, labeled, not likely, etc.
Thanks for playing dullard.
John Kerry said up to $55 billion of money Obama gave Iran may be used for terrorism. Obama willingly gave the Ayatollah money with no restrictions on it. He probably funded terrorism against the US and other western allies.
You don’t even try to defend it because you can’t. It’s awful and completely helping fund a dictatorship.
He’s lucky to have such loyal brownshirts. It’s because you just aren’t at all intelligent. -
You seem upset.BennyBeaver said:
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it. -
Oh, I can read Kerry saying the USA can’t do anything to restrict Iran funding terrorism.BennyBeaver said:
bless your heart. you still can't read the quotes for comprehensionNorthwestFresh said:
White flag already? You do really do suck.BennyBeaver said:
Typical tugtard. Change the subject, move the goalpost, link grandma memes, link articles and don't read them and if you do don't read for comprehension.NorthwestFresh said:
As we sayBennyBeaver said:
It's called "you have your head so far up your ass you are lacking oxygen to the brain"NorthwestFresh said:
Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.BennyBeaver said:
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it.
Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact.
Fuck off, Lightweight.
Typical Democrat. Can’t refute the actual proof so it’s Clown Car time. @HHusky, driver needed for your new recruit.
could, might, labeled, not likely, etc.
Thanks for playing dullard.
John Kerry said up to $55 billion of money Obama gave Iran may be used for terrorism. Obama willingly gave the Ayatollah money with no restrictions on it. He probably funded terrorism against the US and other western allies.
You don’t even try to defend it because you can’t. It’s awful and completely helping fund a dictatorship.
He’s lucky to have such loyal brownshirts. It’s because you just aren’t at all intelligent.
You’re even less knowledgeable on politics than you are at football.
-
dealing with tards like fresh is kinda upsetting.MikeDamone said:
You seem upset.BennyBeaver said:
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it. -
strike...like nineteen...you're out...about 6 times in a row. go back to shallow end of the poolNorthwestFresh said:
Oh, I can read Kerry saying the USA can’t do anything to restrict Iran funding terrorism.BennyBeaver said:
bless your heart. you still can't read the quotes for comprehensionNorthwestFresh said:
White flag already? You do really do suck.BennyBeaver said:
Typical tugtard. Change the subject, move the goalpost, link grandma memes, link articles and don't read them and if you do don't read for comprehension.NorthwestFresh said:
As we sayBennyBeaver said:
It's called "you have your head so far up your ass you are lacking oxygen to the brain"NorthwestFresh said:
Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.BennyBeaver said:
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it.
Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact.
Fuck off, Lightweight.
Typical Democrat. Can’t refute the actual proof so it’s Clown Car time. @HHusky, driver needed for your new recruit.
could, might, labeled, not likely, etc.
Thanks for playing dullard.
John Kerry said up to $55 billion of money Obama gave Iran may be used for terrorism. Obama willingly gave the Ayatollah money with no restrictions on it. He probably funded terrorism against the US and other western allies.
You don’t even try to defend it because you can’t. It’s awful and completely helping fund a dictatorship.
He’s lucky to have such loyal brownshirts. It’s because you just aren’t at all intelligent.
You’re even less knowledgeable on politics than you are at football. -
You’re in the kiddie pool so no problem.BennyBeaver said:
strike...like nineteen...you're out...about 6 times in a row. go back to shallow end of the poolNorthwestFresh said:
Oh, I can read Kerry saying the USA can’t do anything to restrict Iran funding terrorism.BennyBeaver said:
bless your heart. you still can't read the quotes for comprehensionNorthwestFresh said:
White flag already? You do really do suck.BennyBeaver said:
Typical tugtard. Change the subject, move the goalpost, link grandma memes, link articles and don't read them and if you do don't read for comprehension.NorthwestFresh said:
As we sayBennyBeaver said:
It's called "you have your head so far up your ass you are lacking oxygen to the brain"NorthwestFresh said:
Is this taking a bite? You’re so fucking out of your league that you can’t even manage a nibble.BennyBeaver said:
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it.
Up to $55 billion of money the US gave to the regime that overthrew the Shah can go to terrorist groups. John Kerry said that, not me. It’s called a fact.
Fuck off, Lightweight.
Typical Democrat. Can’t refute the actual proof so it’s Clown Car time. @HHusky, driver needed for your new recruit.
could, might, labeled, not likely, etc.
Thanks for playing dullard.
John Kerry said up to $55 billion of money Obama gave Iran may be used for terrorism. Obama willingly gave the Ayatollah money with no restrictions on it. He probably funded terrorism against the US and other western allies.
You don’t even try to defend it because you can’t. It’s awful and completely helping fund a dictatorship.
He’s lucky to have such loyal brownshirts. It’s because you just aren’t at all intelligent.
You’re even less knowledgeable on politics than you are at football. -
sick burn dj jr.
-
Don’t forget your swim diapers.BennyBeaver said:sick burn dj jr.
-
Imaging being upset over posts on an obscure football message board. Take it easy Nancy.BennyBeaver said:
dealing with tards like fresh is kinda upsetting.MikeDamone said:
You seem upset.BennyBeaver said:
Read all the quotes you fucking dipstick.NorthwestFresh said:
Oh, only $55 billion to use for terrorism if they want. Kerry said we? can’t do anything about it. Bend over and take the terrorism, courtesy of Barack Obama.BennyBeaver said:
I'll bite.NorthwestFresh said:
@HHusky Version 0.5 is back again.BennyBeaver said:Embarassing.
Agree though, it’s pathetically embarrassing to give the Chinese government any money for anything. In this case it was “only” $600k directed through a US non-profit that went to the lab in China.
Not as embarrassing as giving Iran money for terrorism, though. Why do you Leftists like to fund communist and Muslim dictators so much?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/01/21/politics/john-kerry-money-iran-sanctions-terrorism/index.html
John Kerry: Some sanctions relief money for Iran will go to terrorism
By Elise Labott, CNN
Updated 2:39 PM EST, Thu January 21, 2016
You only read the headline, right?
I mean, at the very least we could just not given them the extra roughly $55 billion of the Shah government’s money to use for terrorism if the Ayatollah and mullahs now want to use it for terrorism.
“When asked about whether some the $150 billion in sanctions relief to Iran would go to terrorist groups, Kerry reiterated that, after settling debts, Iran would receive closer to $55 billion. He conceded some of that could go to groups considered terrorists, saying there was nothing the U.S. could do to prevent that.”
Go ahead, take a shot at it.
