Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
paul richardson it is
Comments
-
He voted down dnc for saying the hawks made a good trade down acquiring a 4th round pick. Totally butthurt
-
Passion belongs on Doogman is why. Has never been cut out for this site.dhdawg said:He voted down dnc for saying the hawks made a good trade down acquiring a 4th round pick. Totally butthurt
-
Richardson is a really good pick. You can all go kiss Schneiders ring and then gargle. That is all.
-
Passion might be upset I was bashing on Kim. I noticed my Kim bashing posts were the ones he was giving me WTF for.
-
they have 3 4's tomorrow. wouldn't surprise me at all if one of those were a guard, which is a position you can get starters in the 4th round.
I'd also like them to take a LB a CB, and some more help on the DL -
I agree, definitely a guard if there's someone they like, and probably an LB or CB. I wouldn't be surprised to see them take a TE at some point either.dhdawg said:they have 3 4's tomorrow. wouldn't surprise me at all if one of those were a guard, which is a position you can get starters in the 4th round.
I'd also like them to take a LB a CB, and some more help on the DL -
If this was a normal offense, like what they do in Den I would hate this pick.
the seahawks are run, run, throw over your heads, it's at least what they try to be with their reliance on the big play. I think richardson is a good fit for the offense. And if they are starting to go away from big bodied wr's in the draft after the harper and durham disasters I wouldn't blame them. -
@iDawg has been waiting years for Sven to say one positive thing. Ladies and gentleman, that day has arrived.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
He was the only decent player Colorado had last year.dhdawg said:Big WR was a need, don't love the slight frame. However from what I saw in Colorado he can fly.
I would've liked them to go Oline, but I like the idea.
Oh and bill polian hates him so the pick must be good
I'm ok with this. -
One of the picks has to be a LB. Maybe even 2. They need guys to step in next year and 2016 when Wright and Smith (maybe even Wagner) are gone.dnc said:
I agree, definitely a guard if there's someone they like, and probably an LB or CB. I wouldn't be surprised to see them take a TE at some point either.dhdawg said:they have 3 4's tomorrow. wouldn't surprise me at all if one of those were a guard, which is a position you can get starters in the 4th round.
I'd also like them to take a LB a CB, and some more help on the DL
Guard is a good call. At some point, I think a CB will be taken. We have 3 guys and an unknown in Simon. We could always find a journeyman instead though. Other than G and LB, it's really about finding legitimate NFL talent where you can. The team is already loaded. -
lots of handwringing at seahooks.net right now. "there were better WR's on the board."
Gee, I'm glad you are the experts, because I'm pretty sure if Pete and John had a better available WR on their board they would've taken him.
I like how everyone listens to Mel Kiper, prisco, etc. say one WR is better than another and they take it as gospel




