Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Jason Whitlock: Colin Kaepernick is a fraud
Comments
-
Yes the North, where slavery wouldn't have been economically viable anyway, abolished slavery. Vermont had a black population of 3 free blacks when it bravely abolished slavery.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The Northern states had abolition policy in 1807! Look at the fucking charts I found for you. Fifty years later thousands died to prevent the South from splitting. Why did the South want to split? Slaverydnc said:
But it does claim we were a global leader in abolition, which isn't true either.SFGbob said:
The article doesn't claim we were first but please continue with your strawman ass rape.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Agreed. Kaep has always been an opportunistic fuck. He probably didn't know who Frederick Douglass was until 5 years ago.SFGbob said:
That wasn't the "thrust" of the article the way I read it. The thrust is that Kaepernick is a fraud and that his tweeting of Fredrick Douglas speech in order to condemn America’s Independence Day, is an example of that ignorance.GreenRiverGatorz said:
This is a lot of words to say a lot of nothing, which is becoming par for the course for the new angry and politically incensed PGOS.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is not true. Most of the Americas had WAY more slaves...Brazil had 20-30 times more than the US, the Caribbean had more, other South American countries had moreGreenRiverGatorz said:
It really wasn't. And it was chalk full of bad, and flat-out wrong, history.DerekJohnson said:
I thought it was an outstanding articlethechatch said:Whitlock is probably in the top 10 for black guys that get called an Uncle Tom by white guys. He’s a blowhard but I’ve never understood the vitriol some people have for that guy.
The United States of America, because of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, was actually a global leader in abolishing slavery.
Slavery was a global phenemenon. Economies were reliant on it. You couldn’t just snap your fingers and make that kind of global tradition go away. The world still hasn’t rid itself of slavery. But we have and did. And we did it before most of the rest of the civilized world because our imperfect Founding Fathers had foresight.
This is a load of shit. Almost the entirety of Europe and the Americas abolished slavery long before us. Great Sark > Ty moment for us beating out most of Asia and Africa, which certainly wasn't considered the "civilized world" in the 19th century.
ATBSCKS. But so does Jason Whitlock.
Europe no longer had expansive colonies, but even the ones that "abolished" slavery like progressive Utopia Belgium established practices arguably worse than slavery. Ever read Heart of Darkness? First punishment for not meeting harvesting quota - chop off your hand. 2nd offense? We are going to feed your child to a cannibal tribe
You liberals are literally ignorant of history. That is the fucking problem. You are naive and dumb. West African kingdoms conquered weaker kingdoms and sold the fucking human beings as slaves. Should Africans give black Americans reparations?
How come the Middle East doesnt have a huge black population? After all, 50 to 100 times more Africans were enslaved in the Middle East than ever went to the Americas. Hmmm...maybe it's because Arabs literally cut their fucking dicks off to prevent them from ever reproducing, and the labor was so cruel most died within 5 years. There is still this type of slavery going on in North Africa today.
Lets not even touch on the fact the word slave literally comes from Slav, as in the Slavic ethnic group. Every culture in the history of the world has been subject to fucked up imprisonment. Look up the word "janissary"
Leftists....educate yourselves or fuck off and go be a dumbass in your own bubble
Bottom line, holding up the U.S. as some trailblazer of abolishing slavery, which was the thrust of Whitlock's article, is fucking stupid. Of course Europe still had colonies with slavery, that's not the fucking discussion. If you spend lest time diving into angry rants about how the left is ruining your life you might recognize that the point here is pretty fucking simple.
Btw, which country has done more to abolish slavery around the world other than maybe England, than the US?
And whatever steps we?'ve taken to abolish global slavery in the last century doesn't change the fact that we? weren't FIRST.
For further reading Emory university has an entire database on the topic I pulled the graphs from -
Good point. So basically "building the Panama Canal" kind of death rates from swamp ass heat, yella fever and malaria and shit. Makes sense. That 5M figure it still staggering to me.SFGbob said:
Check out the numbers on the mortality rates and lifespan for African slaves that were shipped to South America and the Caribbean. One of the reasons why they needed so many of them.Swaye said:
What were they doing down there? We have cotton in the US and Sugar Cane in the indies, what was slavery used for in Brazil (and how could you need 5 MILLION people to do it)? Is there a great wall of South America that stretches around the continent or some shit?dnc said:
Yeah Brazil was the worst of the worst in both quantity and length. Rio De Janeiro alone had more slaves come through it's port than most other nations of the world (including the US).Swaye said:Great graphic and HOLY SHIT, I had no idea more slaves went to South America and the West Indies than the rest of the world by a factor of like 10. Brazil needs to pay reparations stat!
It's grim.
edit: Was just thinking how many boatloads of humans that must have been. I know they packed them in, but holy fuck that is still tens of thousands of boats full of human beings to bring 5 MILLION people there. I wonder how many tens of thousands died in transit. I wonder how slavery as an institution was even profitable. -
Same could be said for Northern Europe.HHusky said:
Yes the North, where slavery wouldn't have been economically viable anyway, abolished slavery. Vermont had a black population of 3 free blacks when it bravely abolished slavery.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The Northern states had abolition policy in 1807! Look at the fucking charts I found for you. Fifty years later thousands died to prevent the South from splitting. Why did the South want to split? Slaverydnc said:
But it does claim we were a global leader in abolition, which isn't true either.SFGbob said:
The article doesn't claim we were first but please continue with your strawman ass rape.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Agreed. Kaep has always been an opportunistic fuck. He probably didn't know who Frederick Douglass was until 5 years ago.SFGbob said:
That wasn't the "thrust" of the article the way I read it. The thrust is that Kaepernick is a fraud and that his tweeting of Fredrick Douglas speech in order to condemn America’s Independence Day, is an example of that ignorance.GreenRiverGatorz said:
This is a lot of words to say a lot of nothing, which is becoming par for the course for the new angry and politically incensed PGOS.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is not true. Most of the Americas had WAY more slaves...Brazil had 20-30 times more than the US, the Caribbean had more, other South American countries had moreGreenRiverGatorz said:
It really wasn't. And it was chalk full of bad, and flat-out wrong, history.DerekJohnson said:
I thought it was an outstanding articlethechatch said:Whitlock is probably in the top 10 for black guys that get called an Uncle Tom by white guys. He’s a blowhard but I’ve never understood the vitriol some people have for that guy.
The United States of America, because of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, was actually a global leader in abolishing slavery.
Slavery was a global phenemenon. Economies were reliant on it. You couldn’t just snap your fingers and make that kind of global tradition go away. The world still hasn’t rid itself of slavery. But we have and did. And we did it before most of the rest of the civilized world because our imperfect Founding Fathers had foresight.
This is a load of shit. Almost the entirety of Europe and the Americas abolished slavery long before us. Great Sark > Ty moment for us beating out most of Asia and Africa, which certainly wasn't considered the "civilized world" in the 19th century.
ATBSCKS. But so does Jason Whitlock.
Europe no longer had expansive colonies, but even the ones that "abolished" slavery like progressive Utopia Belgium established practices arguably worse than slavery. Ever read Heart of Darkness? First punishment for not meeting harvesting quota - chop off your hand. 2nd offense? We are going to feed your child to a cannibal tribe
You liberals are literally ignorant of history. That is the fucking problem. You are naive and dumb. West African kingdoms conquered weaker kingdoms and sold the fucking human beings as slaves. Should Africans give black Americans reparations?
How come the Middle East doesnt have a huge black population? After all, 50 to 100 times more Africans were enslaved in the Middle East than ever went to the Americas. Hmmm...maybe it's because Arabs literally cut their fucking dicks off to prevent them from ever reproducing, and the labor was so cruel most died within 5 years. There is still this type of slavery going on in North Africa today.
Lets not even touch on the fact the word slave literally comes from Slav, as in the Slavic ethnic group. Every culture in the history of the world has been subject to fucked up imprisonment. Look up the word "janissary"
Leftists....educate yourselves or fuck off and go be a dumbass in your own bubble
Bottom line, holding up the U.S. as some trailblazer of abolishing slavery, which was the thrust of Whitlock's article, is fucking stupid. Of course Europe still had colonies with slavery, that's not the fucking discussion. If you spend lest time diving into angry rants about how the left is ruining your life you might recognize that the point here is pretty fucking simple.
Btw, which country has done more to abolish slavery around the world other than maybe England, than the US?
And whatever steps we?'ve taken to abolish global slavery in the last century doesn't change the fact that we? weren't FIRST.
For further reading Emory university has an entire database on the topic I pulled the graphs from -
They couldve done nothing. And nice cherry picking of the tiniest whitest state. Illinois, Kansas, Ohio, Pennsylvania etc all had a shit ton of agriculture and couldve had an economic incentive for it to continue.HHusky said:
Yes the North, where slavery wouldn't have been economically viable anyway, abolished slavery. Vermont had a black population of 3 free blacks when it bravely abolished slavery.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The Northern states had abolition policy in 1807! Look at the fucking charts I found for you. Fifty years later thousands died to prevent the South from splitting. Why did the South want to split? Slaverydnc said:
But it does claim we were a global leader in abolition, which isn't true either.SFGbob said:
The article doesn't claim we were first but please continue with your strawman ass rape.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Agreed. Kaep has always been an opportunistic fuck. He probably didn't know who Frederick Douglass was until 5 years ago.SFGbob said:
That wasn't the "thrust" of the article the way I read it. The thrust is that Kaepernick is a fraud and that his tweeting of Fredrick Douglas speech in order to condemn America’s Independence Day, is an example of that ignorance.GreenRiverGatorz said:
This is a lot of words to say a lot of nothing, which is becoming par for the course for the new angry and politically incensed PGOS.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is not true. Most of the Americas had WAY more slaves...Brazil had 20-30 times more than the US, the Caribbean had more, other South American countries had moreGreenRiverGatorz said:
It really wasn't. And it was chalk full of bad, and flat-out wrong, history.DerekJohnson said:
I thought it was an outstanding articlethechatch said:Whitlock is probably in the top 10 for black guys that get called an Uncle Tom by white guys. He’s a blowhard but I’ve never understood the vitriol some people have for that guy.
The United States of America, because of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, was actually a global leader in abolishing slavery.
Slavery was a global phenemenon. Economies were reliant on it. You couldn’t just snap your fingers and make that kind of global tradition go away. The world still hasn’t rid itself of slavery. But we have and did. And we did it before most of the rest of the civilized world because our imperfect Founding Fathers had foresight.
This is a load of shit. Almost the entirety of Europe and the Americas abolished slavery long before us. Great Sark > Ty moment for us beating out most of Asia and Africa, which certainly wasn't considered the "civilized world" in the 19th century.
ATBSCKS. But so does Jason Whitlock.
Europe no longer had expansive colonies, but even the ones that "abolished" slavery like progressive Utopia Belgium established practices arguably worse than slavery. Ever read Heart of Darkness? First punishment for not meeting harvesting quota - chop off your hand. 2nd offense? We are going to feed your child to a cannibal tribe
You liberals are literally ignorant of history. That is the fucking problem. You are naive and dumb. West African kingdoms conquered weaker kingdoms and sold the fucking human beings as slaves. Should Africans give black Americans reparations?
How come the Middle East doesnt have a huge black population? After all, 50 to 100 times more Africans were enslaved in the Middle East than ever went to the Americas. Hmmm...maybe it's because Arabs literally cut their fucking dicks off to prevent them from ever reproducing, and the labor was so cruel most died within 5 years. There is still this type of slavery going on in North Africa today.
Lets not even touch on the fact the word slave literally comes from Slav, as in the Slavic ethnic group. Every culture in the history of the world has been subject to fucked up imprisonment. Look up the word "janissary"
Leftists....educate yourselves or fuck off and go be a dumbass in your own bubble
Bottom line, holding up the U.S. as some trailblazer of abolishing slavery, which was the thrust of Whitlock's article, is fucking stupid. Of course Europe still had colonies with slavery, that's not the fucking discussion. If you spend lest time diving into angry rants about how the left is ruining your life you might recognize that the point here is pretty fucking simple.
Btw, which country has done more to abolish slavery around the world other than maybe England, than the US?
And whatever steps we?'ve taken to abolish global slavery in the last century doesn't change the fact that we? weren't FIRST.
For further reading Emory university has an entire database on the topic I pulled the graphs from
Fuck. Off. -
Exactly. On a global scale the lucky slaves ended up in America. It's why we have 30 million plus African Americans in this country who have a huge influence on culture, pop culture, our economy, etc.SFGbob said:
Check out the numbers on the mortality rates and lifespan for African slaves that were shipped to South America and the Caribbean. One of the reasons why they needed so many of them.Swaye said:
What were they doing down there? We have cotton in the US and Sugar Cane in the indies, what was slavery used for in Brazil (and how could you need 5 MILLION people to do it)? Is there a great wall of South America that stretches around the continent or some shit?dnc said:
Yeah Brazil was the worst of the worst in both quantity and length. Rio De Janeiro alone had more slaves come through it's port than most other nations of the world (including the US).Swaye said:Great graphic and HOLY SHIT, I had no idea more slaves went to South America and the West Indies than the rest of the world by a factor of like 10. Brazil needs to pay reparations stat!
It's grim.
How come Chile doesnt have many black people in it? They had the same amount of slaves as the US according to those charts...
Because the Spanish were indescribably cruel to everyone and most slaves in Spanish countries died
It is blowing my mind that more people dont know this -
Yes, for those Northern European countries that practiced slavery. Would Britain have abolished slavery when it did if cotton could be grown on those islands? I doubt it.SFGbob said:
Same could be said for Northern Europe.HHusky said:
Yes the North, where slavery wouldn't have been economically viable anyway, abolished slavery. Vermont had a black population of 3 free blacks when it bravely abolished slavery.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The Northern states had abolition policy in 1807! Look at the fucking charts I found for you. Fifty years later thousands died to prevent the South from splitting. Why did the South want to split? Slaverydnc said:
But it does claim we were a global leader in abolition, which isn't true either.SFGbob said:
The article doesn't claim we were first but please continue with your strawman ass rape.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Agreed. Kaep has always been an opportunistic fuck. He probably didn't know who Frederick Douglass was until 5 years ago.SFGbob said:
That wasn't the "thrust" of the article the way I read it. The thrust is that Kaepernick is a fraud and that his tweeting of Fredrick Douglas speech in order to condemn America’s Independence Day, is an example of that ignorance.GreenRiverGatorz said:
This is a lot of words to say a lot of nothing, which is becoming par for the course for the new angry and politically incensed PGOS.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is not true. Most of the Americas had WAY more slaves...Brazil had 20-30 times more than the US, the Caribbean had more, other South American countries had moreGreenRiverGatorz said:
It really wasn't. And it was chalk full of bad, and flat-out wrong, history.DerekJohnson said:
I thought it was an outstanding articlethechatch said:Whitlock is probably in the top 10 for black guys that get called an Uncle Tom by white guys. He’s a blowhard but I’ve never understood the vitriol some people have for that guy.
The United States of America, because of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, was actually a global leader in abolishing slavery.
Slavery was a global phenemenon. Economies were reliant on it. You couldn’t just snap your fingers and make that kind of global tradition go away. The world still hasn’t rid itself of slavery. But we have and did. And we did it before most of the rest of the civilized world because our imperfect Founding Fathers had foresight.
This is a load of shit. Almost the entirety of Europe and the Americas abolished slavery long before us. Great Sark > Ty moment for us beating out most of Asia and Africa, which certainly wasn't considered the "civilized world" in the 19th century.
ATBSCKS. But so does Jason Whitlock.
Europe no longer had expansive colonies, but even the ones that "abolished" slavery like progressive Utopia Belgium established practices arguably worse than slavery. Ever read Heart of Darkness? First punishment for not meeting harvesting quota - chop off your hand. 2nd offense? We are going to feed your child to a cannibal tribe
You liberals are literally ignorant of history. That is the fucking problem. You are naive and dumb. West African kingdoms conquered weaker kingdoms and sold the fucking human beings as slaves. Should Africans give black Americans reparations?
How come the Middle East doesnt have a huge black population? After all, 50 to 100 times more Africans were enslaved in the Middle East than ever went to the Americas. Hmmm...maybe it's because Arabs literally cut their fucking dicks off to prevent them from ever reproducing, and the labor was so cruel most died within 5 years. There is still this type of slavery going on in North Africa today.
Lets not even touch on the fact the word slave literally comes from Slav, as in the Slavic ethnic group. Every culture in the history of the world has been subject to fucked up imprisonment. Look up the word "janissary"
Leftists....educate yourselves or fuck off and go be a dumbass in your own bubble
Bottom line, holding up the U.S. as some trailblazer of abolishing slavery, which was the thrust of Whitlock's article, is fucking stupid. Of course Europe still had colonies with slavery, that's not the fucking discussion. If you spend lest time diving into angry rants about how the left is ruining your life you might recognize that the point here is pretty fucking simple.
Btw, which country has done more to abolish slavery around the world other than maybe England, than the US?
And whatever steps we?'ve taken to abolish global slavery in the last century doesn't change the fact that we? weren't FIRST.
For further reading Emory university has an entire database on the topic I pulled the graphs from -
They grow a lot of cotton in those states?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
They couldve done nothing. And nice cherry picking of the tiniest whitest state. Illinois, Kansas, Ohio, Pennsylvania etc all had a shit ton of agriculture and couldve had an economic incentive for it to continue.HHusky said:
Yes the North, where slavery wouldn't have been economically viable anyway, abolished slavery. Vermont had a black population of 3 free blacks when it bravely abolished slavery.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The Northern states had abolition policy in 1807! Look at the fucking charts I found for you. Fifty years later thousands died to prevent the South from splitting. Why did the South want to split? Slaverydnc said:
But it does claim we were a global leader in abolition, which isn't true either.SFGbob said:
The article doesn't claim we were first but please continue with your strawman ass rape.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Agreed. Kaep has always been an opportunistic fuck. He probably didn't know who Frederick Douglass was until 5 years ago.SFGbob said:
That wasn't the "thrust" of the article the way I read it. The thrust is that Kaepernick is a fraud and that his tweeting of Fredrick Douglas speech in order to condemn America’s Independence Day, is an example of that ignorance.GreenRiverGatorz said:
This is a lot of words to say a lot of nothing, which is becoming par for the course for the new angry and politically incensed PGOS.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is not true. Most of the Americas had WAY more slaves...Brazil had 20-30 times more than the US, the Caribbean had more, other South American countries had moreGreenRiverGatorz said:
It really wasn't. And it was chalk full of bad, and flat-out wrong, history.DerekJohnson said:
I thought it was an outstanding articlethechatch said:Whitlock is probably in the top 10 for black guys that get called an Uncle Tom by white guys. He’s a blowhard but I’ve never understood the vitriol some people have for that guy.
The United States of America, because of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, was actually a global leader in abolishing slavery.
Slavery was a global phenemenon. Economies were reliant on it. You couldn’t just snap your fingers and make that kind of global tradition go away. The world still hasn’t rid itself of slavery. But we have and did. And we did it before most of the rest of the civilized world because our imperfect Founding Fathers had foresight.
This is a load of shit. Almost the entirety of Europe and the Americas abolished slavery long before us. Great Sark > Ty moment for us beating out most of Asia and Africa, which certainly wasn't considered the "civilized world" in the 19th century.
ATBSCKS. But so does Jason Whitlock.
Europe no longer had expansive colonies, but even the ones that "abolished" slavery like progressive Utopia Belgium established practices arguably worse than slavery. Ever read Heart of Darkness? First punishment for not meeting harvesting quota - chop off your hand. 2nd offense? We are going to feed your child to a cannibal tribe
You liberals are literally ignorant of history. That is the fucking problem. You are naive and dumb. West African kingdoms conquered weaker kingdoms and sold the fucking human beings as slaves. Should Africans give black Americans reparations?
How come the Middle East doesnt have a huge black population? After all, 50 to 100 times more Africans were enslaved in the Middle East than ever went to the Americas. Hmmm...maybe it's because Arabs literally cut their fucking dicks off to prevent them from ever reproducing, and the labor was so cruel most died within 5 years. There is still this type of slavery going on in North Africa today.
Lets not even touch on the fact the word slave literally comes from Slav, as in the Slavic ethnic group. Every culture in the history of the world has been subject to fucked up imprisonment. Look up the word "janissary"
Leftists....educate yourselves or fuck off and go be a dumbass in your own bubble
Bottom line, holding up the U.S. as some trailblazer of abolishing slavery, which was the thrust of Whitlock's article, is fucking stupid. Of course Europe still had colonies with slavery, that's not the fucking discussion. If you spend lest time diving into angry rants about how the left is ruining your life you might recognize that the point here is pretty fucking simple.
Btw, which country has done more to abolish slavery around the world other than maybe England, than the US?
And whatever steps we?'ve taken to abolish global slavery in the last century doesn't change the fact that we? weren't FIRST.
For further reading Emory university has an entire database on the topic I pulled the graphs from
Fuck. Off.
And Vermont was the first, I believe, to take this stance. -
not to get off slavery but Mrs. Lebam saw something about Kaepernick being muslim so I looked as a bunch of stuff - his girl friend is a radical muslim, commie, BLM founder etc. and chinfluenced him tremendously
but the interesting article I found was this
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ray-lewis-ravens-refused-to-sign-colin-kaepernick-because-of-girlfriends-tweet/
Now back to slavery
@HHusky Vermont still only has 3 blacks -
I've been led to understand that one of them had a baby. Four.LebamDawg said:not to get off slavery but Mrs. Lebam saw something about Kaepernick being muslim so I looked as a bunch of stuff - his girl friend is a radical muslim, commie, BLM founder etc. and chinfluenced him tremendously
but the interesting article I found was this
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/ray-lewis-ravens-refused-to-sign-colin-kaepernick-because-of-girlfriends-tweet/
Now back to slavery
@HHusky Vermont still only has 3 blacks -
