Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This case in Atlanta is going to be a watershed moment...

1356

Comments

  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,020
    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,757 Standard Supporter
    SECDAWG said:

    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    Entirely justified anywhere in the country. It takes less time for a suspect to turn and fire than your traction time. He turned back as he was shot happens all the time I don't care what color they are.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,020
    Sledog said:

    SECDAWG said:

    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    Entirely justified anywhere in the country. It takes less time for a suspect to turn and fire than your traction time. He turned back as he was shot happens all the time I don't care what color they are.
    I said he won’t be convicted, especially what the suspect did, but no way when he turns and runs away is it common sense justified to execute the suspect, meaning kill him. Shoot his calf out, or call for back up and run him down. No reason to kill another human caus he grabbed your taser and ran. And I am way pro police, pod.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,020
    If you’ve been taught different, this is why we are where we are, lack of training and education.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,020
    Houhusky said:

    SECDAWG said:

    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    Things people say who have little to no firearms knowledge for $1000
    Ha. That’s funny.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    Houhusky said:

    SECDAWG said:

    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    Things people say who have little to no firearms knowledge for $1000
    That's exactly what my 13 year old kid said, telling.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,757 Standard Supporter
    SECDAWG said:

    Sledog said:

    SECDAWG said:

    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    Entirely justified anywhere in the country. It takes less time for a suspect to turn and fire than your traction time. He turned back as he was shot happens all the time I don't care what color they are.
    I said he won’t be convicted, especially what the suspect did, but no way when he turns and runs away is it common sense justified to execute the suspect, meaning kill him. Shoot his calf out, or call for back up and run him down. No reason to kill another human caus he grabbed your taser and ran. And I am way pro police, pod.
    When ever you come up with shoot _______
    You have no idea what your talking about. They only "wing" people and shoot guns out of hands in movies. Real life doesn't work that way.

    A Taser in Georgia is considered a deadly weapon. This same DA charged 6 officers with the crime two weeks ago! So a Taser was deadly then but not now?

    This is theatrical bullshit and so obviously wrong that I wonder if he's doing it on purpose on orders from someone else on the left. It will cause more riots.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,020
    SFGbob said:

    Houhusky said:

    SECDAWG said:

    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    Things people say who have little to no firearms knowledge for $1000
    That's exactly what my 13 year old kid said, telling.
    Good God man, does your 13 yo know the difference in anatomy from a liver, lung shot vs a calf or debilitating injury non fatal from a gun shot wound if have to fire involving a fleeing suspect, especially under the current circumstances in the news, which should have no bearing at anytime??!

    Hell, I’m on your side but fk, can’t see it common sense wise.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter