Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This case in Atlanta is going to be a watershed moment...

DoogieMcDoogerson
DoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,506
DA is pressing charges for murder. Trying the case in the court of public opinion presenting evidence right now. This seems highly unusual to do...how do you get an unbiased jury? In my opinion ( not a lawyer ) the officer will ultimately not be convicted of murder. Imagine what will break out once that happens down the road...

Essentially, what is being said here is you are under arrest, fight to get away from the cops, steal a weapon in the process, and then shoot the weapon at the cops, the cops are supposed to let the criminal run away or at best, only give chase.

Irresponsible.
«1

Comments

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    My guess is the cops become multi millionaires
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    edited June 2020
    Why any cop in Atlanta (or any major city where all this chaos is going on) stays in their job is beyond me. FS...they should quit/retire and move to a nice small town out in the middle of nowhere if they want to still stay in police work. You'd have to be insane to go to work in Atlanta as a police officer right now.

  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999

    My guess is the cops become multi millionaires

    No way. They will get convicted of something...anything...because the entire legal system will be scared to death of riots and chaos if they don't. They have 0% chance of getting a fair trial.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    I agree...I just think the world is too crazy right now. Their best chance is to get everything delayed until after the election...absolutely zero chance they get a fair shake before that. Maybe they could afterwards...I have my doubts though.

    On a side note, apparently the DA is under investigation (pretty much everyone in elected office in Atlanta is crooked) and is probably why he's grandstanding on this...that should help the powder keg.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited June 2020
    DA up for a rough election has to expedite charges. He’s plagiarizing Mike Nifong except at least there is a dead person to rally around and not a skank whore.

    People forget DAs are elected and prosecute for votes.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    DA up for a rough election has to expedite charges. He’s plagiarizing Mike Nifong except at least there is a dead person to rally around and not a skank whore.

    Yeah, the dead guy was another real hero for the black community to rally around.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,725 Standard Supporter
    Dems need more riots.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    edited June 2020
    And it may be starting...seen this bouncing around Twitter on several accounts but no clue if its true or not:

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,037
    Sledog said:

    Dems need more riots.

    They hate winning elections?

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,725 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Dems need more riots.

    They hate winning elections?

    SSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.... They think it helps them.
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,006 Standard Supporter

    DA is pressing charges for murder. Trying the case in the court of public opinion presenting evidence right now. This seems highly unusual to do...how do you get an unbiased jury? In my opinion ( not a lawyer ) the officer will ultimately not be convicted of murder. Imagine what will break out once that happens down the road...

    Essentially, what is being said here is you are under arrest, fight to get away from the cops, steal a weapon in the process, and then shoot the weapon at the cops, the cops are supposed to let the criminal run away or at best, only give chase.

    Irresponsible.

    Just watched the POS family's lawyers come out and demand that the family be compensated. That the guy who was drunk and passed out on his daughters birthday at a fucking Wendy's was a doting father who was there for his daughters birthday. That the daughter will always have to remember this day for the rest of her life. The wife came out and called him her "husband" and acted as if he was a great guy.

    The guy was on probation for cruelty to children, false imprisonment, simple battery and family violence battery.

    The lawyers see a payday and the family is full of shit. I am tired of this crap.
  • DoogieMcDoogerson
    DoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,506
    The media needs to share all the details...but they won't because they like riots and anarchy.
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,785 Swaye's Wigwam
    it will be a conviction (to calm things down to just ghetto riots)
    then out free on appeal (kept quiet or taking a couple of years)
    and then drop charges because he was fired (gets the innocent cop off the hook)
    and settle out of court for seven figures (report this as back pay to appease the masses).

    When the last happens the majority of Atlanta will shrug and say who
    insert who.gif
  • georgiaduck
    georgiaduck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,599 Swaye's Wigwam
    Several rumors on neighborhood sites of APD walking out. Dumbfucks commenting we are safer because of less police.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,725 Standard Supporter

    Interesting no input from investigators. This DA is going to get his ass handed to him.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,607 Standard Supporter
    Those cops should still be working.
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,725 Standard Supporter
    SECDAWG said:

    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    Entirely justified anywhere in the country. It takes less time for a suspect to turn and fire than your traction time. He turned back as he was shot happens all the time I don't care what color they are.
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    Sledog said:

    SECDAWG said:

    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    Entirely justified anywhere in the country. It takes less time for a suspect to turn and fire than your traction time. He turned back as he was shot happens all the time I don't care what color they are.
    I said he won’t be convicted, especially what the suspect did, but no way when he turns and runs away is it common sense justified to execute the suspect, meaning kill him. Shoot his calf out, or call for back up and run him down. No reason to kill another human caus he grabbed your taser and ran. And I am way pro police, pod.
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    If you’ve been taught different, this is why we are where we are, lack of training and education.
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    Houhusky said:

    SECDAWG said:

    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    Things people say who have little to no firearms knowledge for $1000
    Ha. That’s funny.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Houhusky said:

    SECDAWG said:

    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    Things people say who have little to no firearms knowledge for $1000
    That's exactly what my 13 year old kid said, telling.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,725 Standard Supporter
    SECDAWG said:

    Sledog said:

    SECDAWG said:

    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    Entirely justified anywhere in the country. It takes less time for a suspect to turn and fire than your traction time. He turned back as he was shot happens all the time I don't care what color they are.
    I said he won’t be convicted, especially what the suspect did, but no way when he turns and runs away is it common sense justified to execute the suspect, meaning kill him. Shoot his calf out, or call for back up and run him down. No reason to kill another human caus he grabbed your taser and ran. And I am way pro police, pod.
    When ever you come up with shoot _______
    You have no idea what your talking about. They only "wing" people and shoot guns out of hands in movies. Real life doesn't work that way.

    A Taser in Georgia is considered a deadly weapon. This same DA charged 6 officers with the crime two weeks ago! So a Taser was deadly then but not now?

    This is theatrical bullshit and so obviously wrong that I wonder if he's doing it on purpose on orders from someone else on the left. It will cause more riots.
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    SFGbob said:

    Houhusky said:

    SECDAWG said:

    He won’t be convicted(well, maybe in Atlanta) but absolutely no reason to have shot the guy in the back running away. Should have shot in the leg. Or not at all.

    Reform needs to happen in this case, like others, involving “deadly force”.

    Things people say who have little to no firearms knowledge for $1000
    That's exactly what my 13 year old kid said, telling.
    Good God man, does your 13 yo know the difference in anatomy from a liver, lung shot vs a calf or debilitating injury non fatal from a gun shot wound if have to fire involving a fleeing suspect, especially under the current circumstances in the news, which should have no bearing at anytime??!

    Hell, I’m on your side but fk, can’t see it common sense wise.