Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Our brave and courageous leader
Comments
-
Come to the Tug, see HHusky struggle in every thread
-
A white hanky would have sufficed.MikeDamone said:Come to the Tug, see HHusky struggle in every thread
-
You should have plenty. I don’t own one. Don’t need it when I’m always right.HHusky said:
A white hanky would have sufficed.MikeDamone said:Come to the Tug, see HHusky struggle in every thread
-
In his defense, the two inch lifts in his shoes combined with his morbid obesity could also throw his balance off.insinceredawg said: -
Disproval would be a vote to convict. For you it's a simple Fuck off!HHusky said:
He was impeached. He wasn’t convicted.Sledog said:
So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?HHusky said:
You can’t count to 51?Sledog said:
As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!HHusky said:
You missed the televised speeches?Sledog said:
So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.HHusky said:
Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.NorthwestFresh said:
Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.HHusky said:
That’s almost funny, Ivan.NorthwestFresh said:
Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.HHusky said:Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.
Benghazi!!!
Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.
Crackerjack police work, Barney!
Not enough digits I guess.
Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.
Here's the answer
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/05/us/politics/impeachment-vote-results.html
Simple question: did a majority of the Senate express disapproval of the conduct for which he was tried? -
"The President's behavior was shameful and wrong."Sledog said:
Disproval would be a vote to convict. For you it's a simple Fuck off!HHusky said:
He was impeached. He wasn’t convicted.Sledog said:
So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?HHusky said:
You can’t count to 51?Sledog said:
As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!HHusky said:
You missed the televised speeches?Sledog said:
So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.HHusky said:
Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.NorthwestFresh said:
Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.HHusky said:
That’s almost funny, Ivan.NorthwestFresh said:
Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.HHusky said:Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.
Benghazi!!!
Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.
Crackerjack police work, Barney!
Not enough digits I guess.
Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.
Here's the answer
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/05/us/politics/impeachment-vote-results.html
Simple question: did a majority of the Senate express disapproval of the conduct for which he was tried?
Sounds like exoneration to Deputy Fife. -
I'm old enough to remember when leftists didn't care about old people running for president being unsteady on their feet.
https://youtu.be/TnbDZXoA78k
https://youtu.be/9p1KYsu_1MU -
Consuelo makes a career of being wrong. What would they call your clients if 51% of the jury said guilty?HHusky said:
"The President's behavior was shameful and wrong."Sledog said:
Disproval would be a vote to convict. For you it's a simple Fuck off!HHusky said:
He was impeached. He wasn’t convicted.Sledog said:
So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?HHusky said:
You can’t count to 51?Sledog said:
As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!HHusky said:
You missed the televised speeches?Sledog said:
So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.HHusky said:
Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.NorthwestFresh said:
Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.HHusky said:
That’s almost funny, Ivan.NorthwestFresh said:
Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.HHusky said:Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.
Benghazi!!!
Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.
Crackerjack police work, Barney!
Not enough digits I guess.
Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.
Here's the answer
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/05/us/politics/impeachment-vote-results.html
Simple question: did a majority of the Senate express disapproval of the conduct for which he was tried?
Sounds like exoneration to Deputy Fife.
We know you could never prevail at trial. Everyone knows. -
I'm hearing trump is done and is going to jail
-
Actually?Pitchfork51 said:I'm hearing trump is done and is going to jail
-
Done is fine.Pitchfork51 said:I'm hearing trump is done and is going to jail
Looking at his many neurological deficits, and his gut, he's likely to be a big user of healthcare services. Is it cheaper for the taxpayers to have him treated in jail or on the outside? I'd just as soon make the imprisoning decisions on that basis. -
At least be funny. @MontlakeBridgeTroll efforts more than you. Trolling is a young man’s game, Fat.HHusky said:
Done is fine.Pitchfork51 said:I'm hearing trump is done and is going to jail
Looking at his many neurological deficits, and his gut, he's likely to be a big user of healthcare services. Is it cheaper for the taxpayers to have him treated in jail or on the outside? I'd just as soon make the imprisoning decisions on that basis. -
The sad part about this thread is I literally gave HHusky the materials to cherrypick and make his actual argument and he still didn't do it. It's like he's trying to make dumb arguments.
-
He doesn’t make arguments. He posts articles without comment and then has silly insults. As I said, trolling is a young man’s game, and Tubby Magoo isn’t a young man. It’s fun in a sad way. He’s “rich,” “has a JD and an MBA,” yet spends his time driving the Tug Clown Car. God Bless that crazy man.jhfstyle24 said:The sad part about this thread is I literally gave HHusky the materials to cherrypick and make his actual argument and he still didn't do it. It's like he's trying to make dumb arguments.
-
Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.HHusky said:
My question could actually be answered in 3 letters. I’ll spot you the Y and the E.jhfstyle24 said:
HHusky, I'm going to help you out here, because I am nice and that's what I do.HHusky said:
He was impeached. He wasn’t convicted.Sledog said:
So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?HHusky said:
You can’t count to 51?Sledog said:
As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!HHusky said:
You missed the televised speeches?Sledog said:
So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.HHusky said:
Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.NorthwestFresh said:
Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.HHusky said:
That’s almost funny, Ivan.NorthwestFresh said:
Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.HHusky said:Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.
Benghazi!!!
Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.
Crackerjack police work, Barney!
Not enough digits I guess.
Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.
Here's the answer
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/05/us/politics/impeachment-vote-results.html
Simple question: did a majority of the Senate express disapproval of the conduct for which he was tried?
Instead of arguing about strawmen, try backing up your points with some facts. It's a good strategy.
Here is the "full" Mueller report (mild redactions for "harm to ongoing matter"):
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
And here is the transcript of the phone call as released by the White House:
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770
Do with these as you please, but if you're going to talk about the situations, you may as well actually know them. Cherrypick or use full quotes, I don't care, but I'm tired of watching you argue in circles for no reason.
True? Sure, I'm too lazy to look it up and check. But, you could simply send text from the phone call as evidence instead of arguing bullshit that has nothing to do with your overall point, which is that Trump was involved in wrongdoing. -
Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.HHusky said:
My question could actually be answered in 3 letters. I’ll spot you the Y and the E.jhfstyle24 said:
HHusky, I'm going to help you out here, because I am nice and that's what I do.HHusky said:
He was impeached. He wasn’t convicted.Sledog said:
So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?HHusky said:
You can’t count to 51?Sledog said:
As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!HHusky said:
You missed the televised speeches?Sledog said:
So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.HHusky said:
Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.NorthwestFresh said:
Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.HHusky said:
That’s almost funny, Ivan.NorthwestFresh said:
Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.HHusky said:Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.
Benghazi!!!
Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.
Crackerjack police work, Barney!
Not enough digits I guess.
Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.
Here's the answer
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/05/us/politics/impeachment-vote-results.html
Simple question: did a majority of the Senate express disapproval of the conduct for which he was tried?
Instead of arguing about strawmen, try backing up your points with some facts. It's a good strategy.
Here is the "full" Mueller report (mild redactions for "harm to ongoing matter"):
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
And here is the transcript of the phone call as released by the White House:
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770
Do with these as you please, but if you're going to talk about the situations, you may as well actually know them. Cherrypick or use full quotes, I don't care, but I'm tired of watching you argue in circles for no reason.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated. -
Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.HHusky said:
My question could actually be answered in 3 letters. I’ll spot you the Y and the E.jhfstyle24 said:
HHusky, I'm going to help you out here, because I am nice and that's what I do.HHusky said:
He was impeached. He wasn’t convicted.Sledog said:
So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?HHusky said:
You can’t count to 51?Sledog said:
As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!HHusky said:
You missed the televised speeches?Sledog said:
So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.HHusky said:
Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.NorthwestFresh said:
Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.HHusky said:
That’s almost funny, Ivan.NorthwestFresh said:
Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.HHusky said:Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.
Benghazi!!!
Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.
Crackerjack police work, Barney!
Not enough digits I guess.
Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.
Here's the answer
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/05/us/politics/impeachment-vote-results.html
Simple question: did a majority of the Senate express disapproval of the conduct for which he was tried?
Instead of arguing about strawmen, try backing up your points with some facts. It's a good strategy.
Here is the "full" Mueller report (mild redactions for "harm to ongoing matter"):
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
And here is the transcript of the phone call as released by the White House:
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770
Do with these as you please, but if you're going to talk about the situations, you may as well actually know them. Cherrypick or use full quotes, I don't care, but I'm tired of watching you argue in circles for no reason.
True? Sure, I'm too lazy to look it up and check. But, you could simply send text from the phone call as evidence instead of arguing bullshit that has nothing to do with your overall point, which is that Trump was involved in wrongdoing. -
Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.HHusky said:
My question could actually be answered in 3 letters. I’ll spot you the Y and the E.jhfstyle24 said:
HHusky, I'm going to help you out here, because I am nice and that's what I do.HHusky said:
He was impeached. He wasn’t convicted.Sledog said:
So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?HHusky said:
You can’t count to 51?Sledog said:
As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!HHusky said:
You missed the televised speeches?Sledog said:
So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.HHusky said:
Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.NorthwestFresh said:
Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.HHusky said:
That’s almost funny, Ivan.NorthwestFresh said:
Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.HHusky said:Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.
Benghazi!!!
Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.
Crackerjack police work, Barney!
Not enough digits I guess.
Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.
Here's the answer
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/05/us/politics/impeachment-vote-results.html
Simple question: did a majority of the Senate express disapproval of the conduct for which he was tried?
Instead of arguing about strawmen, try backing up your points with some facts. It's a good strategy.
Here is the "full" Mueller report (mild redactions for "harm to ongoing matter"):
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
And here is the transcript of the phone call as released by the White House:
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770
Do with these as you please, but if you're going to talk about the situations, you may as well actually know them. Cherrypick or use full quotes, I don't care, but I'm tired of watching you argue in circles for no reason.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated. -
Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated. -
MikeDamone said:
Come to the Tug, see HHusky Fag Out
struggle inevery thread -
H, ozone, and Insincere would be amazing if they were parody accounts. The reality is that they are human parodies.
-
Fixed that for ya.UW_Doog_Bot said:H, ozone, and Insincere would be amazing if they were parody accounts. The reality is that they are
human parodiesfags. -
Disagree. Evidence confounds, confuses and paralyzes @HHuskyIsRacist's mind daily.GrundleStiltzkin said:Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.
Stand close enough and you'll smell the burning cells in his head. -
TurdBomber said:
Disagree. Evidence confounds, confuses and paralyzes @HHuskyIsRacist's mind daily.GrundleStiltzkin said:Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.
Stand close enough and you'll smell the burning cells in his head.
