Our brave and courageous leader

HHusky

Pitchfork51 said:

I'm hearing trump is done and is going to jail

Done is fine.

Looking at his many neurological deficits, and his gut, he's likely to be a big user of healthcare services. Is it cheaper for the taxpayers to have him treated in jail or on the outside? I'd just as soon make the imprisoning decisions on that basis.

NorthwestFresh

HHusky said:

Pitchfork51 said:

I'm hearing trump is done and is going to jail

Done is fine.

Looking at his many neurological deficits, and his gut, he's likely to be a big user of healthcare services. Is it cheaper for the taxpayers to have him treated in jail or on the outside? I'd just as soon make the imprisoning decisions on that basis.

At least be funny. @MontlakeBridgeTroll efforts more than you. Trolling is a young man’s game, Fat.

jhfstyle24

The sad part about this thread is I literally gave HHusky the materials to cherrypick and make his actual argument and he still didn't do it. It's like he's trying to make dumb arguments.

NorthwestFresh

jhfstyle24 said:

The sad part about this thread is I literally gave HHusky the materials to cherrypick and make his actual argument and he still didn't do it. It's like he's trying to make dumb arguments.

He doesn’t make arguments. He posts articles without comment and then has silly insults. As I said, trolling is a young man’s game, and Tubby Magoo isn’t a young man. It’s fun in a sad way. He’s “rich,” “has a JD and an MBA,” yet spends his time driving the Tug Clown Car. God Bless that crazy man.

jhfstyle24

HHusky said:

jhfstyle24 said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.

Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.

That’s almost funny, Ivan.

Benghazi!!!

Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.

Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.

Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.

So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.

You missed the televised speeches?

Crackerjack police work, Barney!

As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!

You can’t count to 51?

Not enough digits I guess.

So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?

Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.

Here's the answer

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/05/us/politics/impeachment-vote-results.html

He was impeached. He wasn’t convicted.

Simple question: did a majority of the Senate express disapproval of the conduct for which he was tried?

HHusky, I'm going to help you out here, because I am nice and that's what I do.

Instead of arguing about strawmen, try backing up your points with some facts. It's a good strategy.

Here is the "full" Mueller report (mild redactions for "harm to ongoing matter"):
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

And here is the transcript of the phone call as released by the White House:

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770


Do with these as you please, but if you're going to talk about the situations, you may as well actually know them. Cherrypick or use full quotes, I don't care, but I'm tired of watching you argue in circles for no reason.

My question could actually be answered in 3 letters. I’ll spot you the Y and the E.

Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.

True? Sure, I'm too lazy to look it up and check. But, you could simply send text from the phone call as evidence instead of arguing bullshit that has nothing to do with your overall point, which is that Trump was involved in wrongdoing.

jhfstyle24

HHusky said:

jhfstyle24 said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.

Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.

That’s almost funny, Ivan.

Benghazi!!!

Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.

Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.

Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.

So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.

You missed the televised speeches?

Crackerjack police work, Barney!

As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!

You can’t count to 51?

Not enough digits I guess.

So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?

Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.

Here's the answer

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/05/us/politics/impeachment-vote-results.html

He was impeached. He wasn’t convicted.

Simple question: did a majority of the Senate express disapproval of the conduct for which he was tried?

HHusky, I'm going to help you out here, because I am nice and that's what I do.

Instead of arguing about strawmen, try backing up your points with some facts. It's a good strategy.

Here is the "full" Mueller report (mild redactions for "harm to ongoing matter"):
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

And here is the transcript of the phone call as released by the White House:

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770


Do with these as you please, but if you're going to talk about the situations, you may as well actually know them. Cherrypick or use full quotes, I don't care, but I'm tired of watching you argue in circles for no reason.

My question could actually be answered in 3 letters. I’ll spot you the Y and the E.

Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.

True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.

But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.

jhfstyle24

HHusky said:

jhfstyle24 said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.

Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.

That’s almost funny, Ivan.

Benghazi!!!

Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.

Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.

Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.

So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.

You missed the televised speeches?

Crackerjack police work, Barney!

As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!

You can’t count to 51?

Not enough digits I guess.

So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?

Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.

Here's the answer

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/05/us/politics/impeachment-vote-results.html

He was impeached. He wasn’t convicted.

Simple question: did a majority of the Senate express disapproval of the conduct for which he was tried?

HHusky, I'm going to help you out here, because I am nice and that's what I do.

Instead of arguing about strawmen, try backing up your points with some facts. It's a good strategy.

Here is the "full" Mueller report (mild redactions for "harm to ongoing matter"):
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

And here is the transcript of the phone call as released by the White House:

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770


Do with these as you please, but if you're going to talk about the situations, you may as well actually know them. Cherrypick or use full quotes, I don't care, but I'm tired of watching you argue in circles for no reason.

My question could actually be answered in 3 letters. I’ll spot you the Y and the E.

Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.

True? Sure, I'm too lazy to look it up and check. But, you could simply send text from the phone call as evidence instead of arguing bullshit that has nothing to do with your overall point, which is that Trump was involved in wrongdoing.

jhfstyle24

HHusky said:

jhfstyle24 said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

NorthwestFresh said:

HHusky said:

Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.

Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.

That’s almost funny, Ivan.

Benghazi!!!

Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.

Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.

Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.

So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.

You missed the televised speeches?

Crackerjack police work, Barney!

As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!

You can’t count to 51?

Not enough digits I guess.

So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?

Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.

Here's the answer

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/02/05/us/politics/impeachment-vote-results.html

He was impeached. He wasn’t convicted.

Simple question: did a majority of the Senate express disapproval of the conduct for which he was tried?

HHusky, I'm going to help you out here, because I am nice and that's what I do.

Instead of arguing about strawmen, try backing up your points with some facts. It's a good strategy.

Here is the "full" Mueller report (mild redactions for "harm to ongoing matter"):
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

And here is the transcript of the phone call as released by the White House:

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770


Do with these as you please, but if you're going to talk about the situations, you may as well actually know them. Cherrypick or use full quotes, I don't care, but I'm tired of watching you argue in circles for no reason.

My question could actually be answered in 3 letters. I’ll spot you the Y and the E.

Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.

True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.

But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.

GrundleStiltzkin

Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.

True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.

But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.

TurdBomber

MikeDamone said:

Come to the Tug, see HHusky Fag Out struggle in every thread