Looking at his many neurological deficits, and his gut, he's likely to be a big user of healthcare services. Is it cheaper for the taxpayers to have him treated in jail or on the outside? I'd just as soon make the imprisoning decisions on that basis.
Looking at his many neurological deficits, and his gut, he's likely to be a big user of healthcare services. Is it cheaper for the taxpayers to have him treated in jail or on the outside? I'd just as soon make the imprisoning decisions on that basis.
At least be funny. @MontlakeBridgeTroll efforts more than you. Trolling is a young man’s game, Fat.
The sad part about this thread is I literally gave HHusky the materials to cherrypick and make his actual argument and he still didn't do it. It's like he's trying to make dumb arguments.
The sad part about this thread is I literally gave HHusky the materials to cherrypick and make his actual argument and he still didn't do it. It's like he's trying to make dumb arguments.
He doesn’t make arguments. He posts articles without comment and then has silly insults. As I said, trolling is a young man’s game, and Tubby Magoo isn’t a young man. It’s fun in a sad way. He’s “rich,” “has a JD and an MBA,” yet spends his time driving the Tug Clown Car. God Bless that crazy man.
Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.
Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.
That’s almost funny, Ivan.
Benghazi!!!
Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.
Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.
Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.
So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.
You missed the televised speeches?
Crackerjack police work, Barney!
As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!
You can’t count to 51?
Not enough digits I guess.
So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?
Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.
Do with these as you please, but if you're going to talk about the situations, you may as well actually know them. Cherrypick or use full quotes, I don't care, but I'm tired of watching you argue in circles for no reason.
My question could actually be answered in 3 letters. I’ll spot you the Y and the E.
Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.
True? Sure, I'm too lazy to look it up and check. But, you could simply send text from the phone call as evidence instead of arguing bullshit that has nothing to do with your overall point, which is that Trump was involved in wrongdoing.
Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.
Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.
That’s almost funny, Ivan.
Benghazi!!!
Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.
Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.
Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.
So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.
You missed the televised speeches?
Crackerjack police work, Barney!
As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!
You can’t count to 51?
Not enough digits I guess.
So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?
Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.
Do with these as you please, but if you're going to talk about the situations, you may as well actually know them. Cherrypick or use full quotes, I don't care, but I'm tired of watching you argue in circles for no reason.
My question could actually be answered in 3 letters. I’ll spot you the Y and the E.
Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.
Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.
Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.
That’s almost funny, Ivan.
Benghazi!!!
Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.
Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.
Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.
So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.
You missed the televised speeches?
Crackerjack police work, Barney!
As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!
You can’t count to 51?
Not enough digits I guess.
So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?
Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.
Do with these as you please, but if you're going to talk about the situations, you may as well actually know them. Cherrypick or use full quotes, I don't care, but I'm tired of watching you argue in circles for no reason.
My question could actually be answered in 3 letters. I’ll spot you the Y and the E.
Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.
True? Sure, I'm too lazy to look it up and check. But, you could simply send text from the phone call as evidence instead of arguing bullshit that has nothing to do with your overall point, which is that Trump was involved in wrongdoing.
Assassination attempt. Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes demanding an investigation.
Wouldn’t that be your team, Comrade COVID? They sure like to investigate nonsense.
That’s almost funny, Ivan.
Benghazi!!!
Where 4 Americans died and it was found HRC had a personal email server with classified intel on it and was likely hacked by foreign governments.
Same thing as 3 years wasted on Trump not having hookers piss on a bed in Moscow and Michael Cohen not being in Prague. The Clown Car is operational today.
Boris, a majority of the US Senate agreed that Daddy didn’t have a “perfect” phone call when he attempted to extort the Ukraine. You remember.
So the senate voted to impeach? How's he still President? Maybe he needs an attorney! You better call, aren't you Saul? You can go pro bono.
You missed the televised speeches?
Crackerjack police work, Barney!
As usual you are clueless. And wrong. You are not representing all the other lawyers minted at the Kmart correspondence school of law very well!
You can’t count to 51?
Not enough digits I guess.
So Trump was impeached? That's what the vote was for. Yes or no?
Are you this stupid in real life? If so if you have more than .81 cents in the bank you inherited it.
Do with these as you please, but if you're going to talk about the situations, you may as well actually know them. Cherrypick or use full quotes, I don't care, but I'm tired of watching you argue in circles for no reason.
My question could actually be answered in 3 letters. I’ll spot you the Y and the E.
Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.
Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.
Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.
Disagree. Evidence confounds, confuses and paralyzes @HHuskyIsRacist's mind daily.
Stand close enough and you'll smell the burning cells in his head.
Following the convo, it appears you deflected from a comment about Hillary's e-mail server to a comment about the Ukraine phone call. Instead of providing evidence to show Trump is guilty, you stated that the Senate all said they didn't approve.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.
Disagree. Evidence confounds, confuses and paralyzes @HHuskyIsRacist's mind daily.
Stand close enough and you'll smell the burning cells in his head.
Comments
Looking at his many neurological deficits, and his gut, he's likely to be a big user of healthcare services. Is it cheaper for the taxpayers to have him treated in jail or on the outside? I'd just as soon make the imprisoning decisions on that basis.
True? Sure, I'm too lazy to look it up and check. But, you could simply send text from the phone call as evidence instead of arguing bullshit that has nothing to do with your overall point, which is that Trump was involved in wrongdoing.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.
True? Sure, I'm too lazy to look it up and check. But, you could simply send text from the phone call as evidence instead of arguing bullshit that has nothing to do with your overall point, which is that Trump was involved in wrongdoing.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.
True? Sure. I'm too lazy to look that up.
But your overall point is just that Trump has committed wrongdoing. Instead of talking about how he was convicted, try just providing evidence of his actual wrongdoing. This isn't very complicated.
Stand close enough and you'll smell the burning cells in his head.