Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Which one of you fuckers was this
Comments
-
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat. -
One could crop the video at him be pulling out of the car, and that's 100% self defense. Point being, we don't know. Klukker trying to run over protestors (which absolutely happens), or someone who took a turn onto the wrong street (which absolutely happens). The video provided doesn't conclusively tell one or other.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives. -
hey dumbfuck, i was referring to this message from him.SFGbob said:
How big of a lying asshole do you have to be to make this statement immediately after he just said: Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidenceinsinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
But as Doog already pointed out, you have your pre-existing narrative and it really doesn't matter what anyone here actually said. Fucking liar, moron and gullible dipshit. You're the triple threat IC.
"Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense."
You can get off your knees and take doog bot's cock out of your mouth now. -
Actually even if the guy in the car instigated something he backed down and left. He was being chased by the shootee and was then attacked by the shootee. The shootee had become the aggressor. Didn't look like he was making a citizens arrest................UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives. -
You see how fast that crowd of Antifa Betas turned and ran when they saw the gun?Sledog said:
Actually even if the guy in the car instigated something he backed down and left. He was being chased by the shootee and was then attacked by the shootee. The shootee had become the aggressor. Didn't look like he was making a citizens arrest................UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Perhaps the Best Promotional AD for Gun Ownership I've ever seen. -
What's the over/under posts until IC disappears after revealing himself yet again to be a colossal puppet?
-
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat. -
a colossal puppet. wow good one! sounds like you really got me thereUW_Doog_Bot said:What's the over/under posts until IC disappears after revealing himself yet again to be a colossal puppet?
-
insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.WHITE FLAG OF SURRENDER.
-
The last refuge of someone shown to be a fucking dumbass. "Lol, I was just trolling"insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
Yeah, you really showed us by making yourself look like a fucking ignorant leftist dumbass that swallows their media instead of spitting.
This would be a good troll if you were a parody account pretending to be this stupid. Instead your just a real life parody of the Left.
-
Callout POTD.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The last refuge of someone shown to be a fucking dumbass. "Lol, I was just trolling"insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
Yeah, you really showed us by making yourself look like a fucking ignorant leftist dumbass that swallows their media instead of spitting.
This would be a good troll if you were a parody account pretending to be this stupid. Instead your just a real life parody of the Left. -
Running to the old "oh, I was joking" excuse when you get your fudge packed in is weak.insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
-
You’ve made quite clear how much it matters that people like you here. You even mocked me saying nobody “likes” me to which I replied IDGAF, and you’re soft for bringing it up in the first place.insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
Now stop whining, put on some dark clothes, and get out there to loot and assault people, you pussy! -
*you'reUW_Doog_Bot said:
The last refuge of someone shown to be a fucking dumbass. "Lol, I was just trolling"insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
Yeah, you really showed us by making yourself look like a fucking ignorant leftist dumbass that swallows their media instead of spitting.
This would be a good troll if you were a parody account pretending to be this stupid. Instead your just a real life parody of the Left.
I troll here cause I find it fascinating a large subset of the general population could be so ignorant, racist, and blind to reality. I've never had any illusions of convincing your ilk of changing your mind because you're already so far off the deep end. But sure, congrats on the the pats on the back for the "callout POTD". That's a great achievement that you should be proud of.
-
You've used this line a dozen times already. Is this supposed to be funny? Why aren't you out there with your fellow alt right trolls defending your town from the scary Antifa?NorthwestFresh said:
You’ve made quite clear how much it matters that people like you here. You even mocked me saying nobody “likes” me to which I replied IDGAF, and you’re soft for bringing it up in the first place.insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
Now stop whining, put on some dark clothes, and get out there to loot and assault people, you pussy! -
IC is the clown show we all know the far left to be.insinceredawg said:
You've used this line a dozen times already. Is this supposed to be funny? Why aren't you out there with your fellow alt right trolls defending your town from the scary Antifa?NorthwestFresh said:
You’ve made quite clear how much it matters that people like you here. You even mocked me saying nobody “likes” me to which I replied IDGAF, and you’re soft for bringing it up in the first place.insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
Now stop whining, put on some dark clothes, and get out there to loot and assault people, you pussy!
-
So you admit you’re a pussy. I’m not the one defending the looters attacking random people or killing fellow protesters, that is you lying for your fellow mentally ill DemocRATS scurrying in the streets..insinceredawg said:
You've used this line a dozen times already. Is this supposed to be funny? Why aren't you out there with your fellow alt right trolls defending your town from the scary Antifa?NorthwestFresh said:
You’ve made quite clear how much it matters that people like you here. You even mocked me saying nobody “likes” me to which I replied IDGAF, and you’re soft for bringing it up in the first place.insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
Now stop whining, put on some dark clothes, and get out there to loot and assault people, you pussy!
Oh, and nobody likes you. -
-
Are you on the Hondo commission plan or the Dazzler monthly retainer shit poast program? Both appear to be highly lucrative.insinceredawg said:
*you'reUW_Doog_Bot said:
The last refuge of someone shown to be a fucking dumbass. "Lol, I was just trolling"insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
Yeah, you really showed us by making yourself look like a fucking ignorant leftist dumbass that swallows their media instead of spitting.
This would be a good troll if you were a parody account pretending to be this stupid. Instead your just a real life parody of the Left.
I troll here cause I find it fascinating a large subset of the general population could be so ignorant, racist, and blind to reality. I've never had any illusions of convincing your ilk of changing your mind because you're already so far off the deep end. But sure, congrats on the the pats on the back for the "callout POTD". That's a great achievement that you should be proud of.
Pro tip: Get paid in US dollars, not Chinese yuan.
-
As I was saying...GrundleStiltzkin said:
One could crop the video at him be pulling out of the car, and that's 100% self defense. Point being, we don't know. Klukker trying to run over protestors (which absolutely happens), or someone who took a turn onto the wrong street (which absolutely happens). The video provided doesn't conclusively tell one or other.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
-
But is he a White Hispanic?GrundleStiltzkin said: -
Now this is fucking rich coming from the dumbfuck who swallowed like a bitch the entire Trump colluded with Russia narrative. I've yet to see this fucking moron get anything right and he is calling other people ignorant? Fuck off.insinceredawg said:
*you'reUW_Doog_Bot said:
The last refuge of someone shown to be a fucking dumbass. "Lol, I was just trolling"insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
Yeah, you really showed us by making yourself look like a fucking ignorant leftist dumbass that swallows their media instead of spitting.
This would be a good troll if you were a parody account pretending to be this stupid. Instead your just a real life parody of the Left.
I troll here cause I find it fascinating a large subset of the general population could be so ignorant, racist, and blind to reality. I've never had any illusions of convincing your ilk of changing your mind because you're already so far off the deep end. But sure, congrats on the the pats on the back for the "callout POTD". That's a great achievement that you should be proud of. -
Has there ever been a person who has shit all over themselves more than IC? Say goodbye to IC for a few days boys.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Hey IC your record is still intact, you've still never gotten anything right. Who knew that the way you "troll" someone is to make a complete ass out yourself. -
is this supposed to be a "gotcha" moment? I said earlier today the guy is a minority so you don't have to defend him anymore. Try to keep up dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Has there ever been a person who has shit all over themselves more than IC? Say goodbye to IC for a few days boys.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Hey IC your record is still intact, you've still never gotten anything right. -
I’ll still defend him. By the looks of it, some ‘black’ guy was attacking a ‘brown’ person and got their arm shot for the effort. Oh well.insinceredawg said:
is this supposed to be a "gotcha" moment? I said earlier today the guy is a minority so you don't have to defend him anymore. Try to keep up dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Has there ever been a person who has shit all over themselves more than IC? Say goodbye to IC for a few days boys.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Hey IC your record is still intact, you've still never gotten anything right. -
I never did defend him. I defended the truth, something that you clearly have no regard for. Based upon the available video that you posted there wasn't any evidence to show that he instigated that encounter. You lied your ass off and claimed he only stopped his car because he was being assaulted. Fuck off IC. The next time you get anything right it will be the first time.insinceredawg said:
is this supposed to be a "gotcha" moment? I said earlier today the guy is a minority so you don't have to defend him anymore. Try to keep up dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Has there ever been a person who has shit all over themselves more than IC? Say goodbye to IC for a few days boys.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Hey IC your record is still intact, you've still never gotten anything right. -
Annnnnnnndddddd we've got the "I'm actually way smarter than this whole place and am just pretending to be this stupid for the lulz."insinceredawg said:
*you'reUW_Doog_Bot said:
The last refuge of someone shown to be a fucking dumbass. "Lol, I was just trolling"insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
Yeah, you really showed us by making yourself look like a fucking ignorant leftist dumbass that swallows their media instead of spitting.
This would be a good troll if you were a parody account pretending to be this stupid. Instead your just a real life parody of the Left.
I troll here cause I find it fascinating a large subset of the general population could be so ignorant, racist, and blind to reality. I've never had any illusions of convincing your ilk of changing your mind because you're already so far off the deep end. But sure, congrats on the the pats on the back for the "callout POTD". That's a great achievement that you should be proud of.
Like I said, real life, walking, talking, parody of a person. -
Have you ever considered the fact that he enjoys getting his shit packed?PurpleThrobber said:
Running to the old "oh, I was joking" excuse when you get your fudge packed in is weak.insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat. -
I defend any citizen defending themselves.insinceredawg said:
is this supposed to be a "gotcha" moment? I said earlier today the guy is a minority so you don't have to defend him anymore. Try to keep up dumbfuck.SFGbob said:
Has there ever been a person who has shit all over themselves more than IC? Say goodbye to IC for a few days boys.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Hey IC your record is still intact, you've still never gotten anything right. -
Self awareness phaser set to stun.insinceredawg said:
*you'reUW_Doog_Bot said:
The last refuge of someone shown to be a fucking dumbass. "Lol, I was just trolling"insinceredawg said:
LMAO. You think I care about what you or anyone else in this cesspool thinks? I shitpost to get a rise out of you mental midgets and it works EVERY FUCKING TIME. I'm not here to change anyone's mind cause you're all beyond hope. Go fuck yourself.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.insinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.
I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.
Yeah, you really showed us by making yourself look like a fucking ignorant leftist dumbass that swallows their media instead of spitting.
This would be a good troll if you were a parody account pretending to be this stupid. Instead your just a real life parody of the Left.
I troll here cause I find it fascinating a large subset of the general population could be so ignorant, racist, and blind to reality. I've never had any illusions of convincing your ilk of changing your mind because you're already so far off the deep end. But sure, congrats on the the pats on the back for the "callout POTD". That's a great achievement that you should be proud of.
