SFGbob said:

insinceredawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

insinceredawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.

The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?

More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him

https://twitter.com/ByMikeBaker/status/1269844273026891778

But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.

The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.

Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.

So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?

I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.

Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.

You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.

Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.

Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.

How big of a lying asshole do you have to be to make this statement immediately after he just said: Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence

But as Doog already pointed out, you have your pre-existing narrative and it really doesn't matter what anyone here actually said. Fucking liar, moron and gullible dipshit. You're the triple threat IC.

UW_Doog_Bot said:

insinceredawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

insinceredawg said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

insinceredawg said:

SFGbob said:

Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.

The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?

More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him

https://twitter.com/ByMikeBaker/status/1269844273026891778

But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.

The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.

Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.

So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?

I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.

Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.

You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.

Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.

Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.

Dipshit, the video you fucking posted has the guy chasing a car and then going through a window to assault the driver. Unless you have evidence of that driver previously assaulting that same dude you are fucking beat. That's how this works you fucking kindergartner.

Even then, in states like Washington and California you can be charged with excessive force and assault if the original perpetrator is no longer considered a threat and is attempting to flee. That's your team's dumbass fucking laws.

I'm withholding judgement on what actually happened and saying this is what the evidence shows atm. You're the dumbfuck claiming to know what happened despite the evidence and without further evidence. I fully invite you to change my mind by posting further evidence that actually proves your fucking point you fucking twat.