Which one of you fuckers was this
Comments
-
I need to know the races involved before I get outraged
-
You sound surprised.
Mess with the bull long enough, don’t be shocked when someone gets gored. -
If only we hadn't had police.
-
Clearly not black, if he was black the police would have pulled the triggerPitchfork51 said:I need to know the races involved before I get outraged
-
Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC? -
This. Can't wait to go to Seattle with no cops. I'm sure all the Karens and homeless will protect us when we are getting shot at. Fucking imbeciles.UW_Doog_Bot said:If only we hadn't had police.
-
Wow. The article is complete bullshit. The man was being attacked and beaten in his own car. For protection he pulls out a gun and shoots the piece of shit violent leftist thug. He then gets out of his car and runs to the police, tells them what he did and turns himself in. The article would have you believe something only a rat could watch in video and lie about in writing.
All of the sudden rats are worried about people being hurt or killed? LOL! They don't like it when the tables are turned.
Another "Hands UP" moment for you rats. -
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him. -
Tear gas wasn’t used at Lafayette Square. Smoke and pepper balls were. Not at all the same things. It’s too bad the driver didn’t run over you, of course you’re too cowardly to even go out and protest yet you shit talk those out there being attacked by your fellow punks.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him. -
I see a crowd chasing a car and attacking the occupant. Did his shirt hurt them with some message? Did he have a Trump hat or sticker on his car? Why is a bunch of people chasing him. We know commie mobs will beat, shoot and loot so why are they being aggressive toward this guy?insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him. -
Hey asswhole, based on the early video that you posted a guy was sitting in his vehicle and another person was reaching in through his open window and wrestling with him. I base my position on the available facts. Fuck off.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him. -
That's exactly what I see. And of course IC is lying his ass off. The guy slows down and stops and then is assaulted by the guy he shoots.Sledog said:
I see a crowd chasing a car and attacking the occupant. Did his shirt hurt them with some message? Did he have a Trump hat or sticker on his car? Why is a bunch of people chasing him. We know commie mobs will beat, shoot and loot so why are they being aggressive toward this guy?insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
Fucking liar. He comes to a complete stop and then he is assaulted. -
Watch the video again dumbfuck. Around the 14 second mark, the guy he shoots is already running alongside the car trying to slow him down. Why are you such a liar Gay Bob?SFGbob said:
That's exactly what I see. And of course IC is lying his ass off. The guy slows down and stops and then is assaulted by the guy he shoots.Sledog said:
I see a crowd chasing a car and attacking the occupant. Did his shirt hurt them with some message? Did he have a Trump hat or sticker on his car? Why is a bunch of people chasing him. We know commie mobs will beat, shoot and loot so why are they being aggressive toward this guy?insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
Fucking liar. He comes to a complete stop and then he is assaulted. -
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up. -
look again dungus the crowd is chasing him and he slowed down because he DIDN'T want to drive into the crowd in front of him. Take off the red colored glasses!insinceredawg said:
Watch the video again dumbfuck. Around the 14 second mark, the guy he shoots is already running alongside the car trying to slow him down. Why are you such a liar Gay Bob?SFGbob said:
That's exactly what I see. And of course IC is lying his ass off. The guy slows down and stops and then is assaulted by the guy he shoots.Sledog said:
I see a crowd chasing a car and attacking the occupant. Did his shirt hurt them with some message? Did he have a Trump hat or sticker on his car? Why is a bunch of people chasing him. We know commie mobs will beat, shoot and loot so why are they being aggressive toward this guy?insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
Fucking liar. He comes to a complete stop and then he is assaulted. -
There's not enough information in that video to determine one way or other. A person was shot, the courts now have to sort out.
Regardless of intention or instigation, shit like this is going to happen, unfortunately. There was video last week of protestors blocking a freeway, and then breaking out windows of a minivan trying to pull occupants out. No place for the car to escape. -
Because it makes absolute sense that a guy driving would STOP when a spindly protestor holding up what appears to be a metal road construction plate..SO HE DOESN'T TRASH HIS CAR.....but apparently is intent on running over protestors?!? Is that the assertion you're trying to make?insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
That makes no sense whatsoever.
Or is it a plant who was planted to rev his car through the crowd, stop when met with just the slightest skinny jean obstruction, jump out, brandish a pistol, then run half a block to the waiting arms of the police? And nobody tries to tackle him in the mob?
We're getting Wagged the Dog every single fucking day for Insta posts and videos.
-
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up. -
That’s a good shooting. I’m surprised there haven’t been more incidents tbh.
-
GrundleStiltzkin said:
There's not enough information in that video to determine one way or other. A person was shot, the courts now have to sort out.
Regardless of intention or instigation, shit like this is going to happen, unfortunately. There was video last week of protestors blocking a freeway, and then breaking out windows of a minivan trying to pull occupants out. No place for the car to escape.
There is an escape the road just has speed bumps. Do this to me and I am driving! If you're in the way too fucking bad!GrundleStiltzkin said:There's not enough information in that video to determine one way or other. A person was shot, the courts now have to sort out.
Regardless of intention or instigation, shit like this is going to happen, unfortunately. There was video last week of protestors blocking a freeway, and then breaking out windows of a minivan trying to pull occupants out. No place for the car to escape. -
Watch the video again. He has already stopped his car when the guy runs up and assaults him. You're a fucking liar IC.insinceredawg said:
Watch the video again dumbfuck. Around the 14 second mark, the guy he shoots is already running alongside the car trying to slow him down. Why are you such a liar Gay Bob?SFGbob said:
That's exactly what I see. And of course IC is lying his ass off. The guy slows down and stops and then is assaulted by the guy he shoots.Sledog said:
I see a crowd chasing a car and attacking the occupant. Did his shirt hurt them with some message? Did he have a Trump hat or sticker on his car? Why is a bunch of people chasing him. We know commie mobs will beat, shoot and loot so why are they being aggressive toward this guy?insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" him
Fucking liar. He comes to a complete stop and then he is assaulted. -
It's a great example of what a lying piece of shit IC is.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up. -
IC is TOLD what to think! His away team coaches at work. Hang on he'll walk up the safety!
-
There have been - it's the police getting slaughtered all over the country.USMChawk said:That’s a good shooting. I’m surprised there haven’t been more incidents tbh.
IED planted in Santa Cruz - one officer dead.
Not a fucking word on the national news last night.
-
No one said he was attacked for no reason you strawman ass fucking Kunt. But based upon what you can see from the videos your description of what happened is a fucking lie. But you're a fucking liar so that's hardly shocking.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up. -
I’m saying I’m surprised more Antifa thugs haven’t been shot by armed citizens.PurpleThrobber said:
There have been - it's the police getting slaughtered all over the country.USMChawk said:That’s a good shooting. I’m surprised there haven’t been more incidents tbh.
IED planted in Santa Cruz - one officer dead.
Not a fucking word on the national news last night.
-
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives. -
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
Nailed it. -
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives. -
How big of a lying asshole do you have to be to make this statement immediately after he just said: Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidenceinsinceredawg said:
Yet somehow you have all the evidence needed to jump to the conclusion the guy was acting solely out of self defense? Fuck off.UW_Doog_Bot said:
I'm glad to see you not run and hide like usual. Instead you can grandstand and let everyone know what a dumbfuck you are as usual when you stick it out.insinceredawg said:
So this guy was driving around with a loaded weapon just happened to stumble onto a street that was packed with protesters and was attacked for no reason? Are you also stupid enough to believe Gay Bob's wife is black?UW_Doog_Bot said:
The fuck are you watching? Dude is chasing him down the street and he's trying to get away, realizes he's going to not be able to leave, then stops, dude then proceeds to assault him through the window and he shoots him in self defense.insinceredawg said:
More complete footage. The guy was driving straight towards the protesters and only slowed down because of the guy "assaulting" himSFGbob said:Appears to be man in a car being assaulted pulls a gun and shoots the person assaulting him.
The guy is sitting in his car, we don't see what happened prior to this and the guy he shoots has his arms inside the car grabbing or doing something to the man in the car. Why are you supporting assault and battery IC?
But of course you also swallowed the lie that tear gas wasn't used at Lafayette Square like a gullible Kunt so of course you'd side with this shooter. Btw, he appears to be a minority so you no longer have to defend him.
Unless you have video of him beginning that encounter before he gets chased your just making shit up.
Last I checked carrying a weapon for self defense is legal in WA. Seattle's protests haven't even remotely been "peaceful" with the presence of the black block and their dipshit friends. Even the liberal media has armed guards at this point so why shouldn't a normal citizen be allowed to carry? Oh right, in IC's world it's all white supremacists looting and rioting...which would still mean that normal citizens should protect themselves.
You have zero evidence of why this encounter started. None. All you have are your assumptions based on a narrative you already believe in which doesn't qualify for Occam's razor no matter how much you wish it to be true.
Either party could have been the antagonist that began that encounter with the available evidence but either way you are a dipshit drawing conclusions based on pre-existing narratives.
But as Doog already pointed out, you have your pre-existing narrative and it really doesn't matter what anyone here actually said. Fucking liar, moron and gullible dipshit. You're the triple threat IC.
