Flynn Filing Shows Mueller Team Manipulated Transcript in Report…
Comments
-
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
Remember when Mueller was the savior of America?
His failure is now complete. -
I understand you haven’t changed your argument. What happened today didn’t offer your argument any new support. You thought it did. Embarrassing.SFGbob said:
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
I haven't changed my argument at all Kunt. I called it prosecutorial misconduct over a year ago while you sucked Mueller's wizened cock and claimed I was getting "desperate." Prosecutorial misconduct was already established. Yesterday just added more fuel to the fire of what a shameless fucking hack you are.HHusky said:
I understand you haven’t changed your argument. What happened today didn’t offer your argument any new support. You thought it did. Embarrassing.SFGbob said:
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
Now you want to quarrel about points of agreement. People do avoid you at family gatherings, don't they?SFGbob said:
I haven't changed my argument at all .HHusky said:
I understand you haven’t changed your argument. What happened today didn’t offer your argument any new support. You thought it did. Embarrassing.SFGbob said:
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
You agree that sucked Mueller wizened cock and that yesterday only added further confirmation of what a shameless lying piece of shit you are? Good for you to finally admit it.HHusky said:
Now you want to quarrel about points of agreement. People do avoid you at family gatherings, don't they?SFGbob said:
I haven't changed my argument at all .HHusky said:
I understand you haven’t changed your argument. What happened today didn’t offer your argument any new support. You thought it did. Embarrassing.SFGbob said:
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
Were you ever clever?SFGbob said:
You agree that sucked Mueller wizened cock and that yesterday only added further confirmation of what a shameless lying piece of shit you are? Good for you to finally admit it.HHusky said:
Now you want to quarrel about points of agreement. People do avoid you at family gatherings, don't they?SFGbob said:
I haven't changed my argument at all .HHusky said:
I understand you haven’t changed your argument. What happened today didn’t offer your argument any new support. You thought it did. Embarrassing.SFGbob said:
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
Were you ever not a lying piece of crap?HHusky said:
Were you ever clever?SFGbob said:
You agree that sucked Mueller wizened cock and that yesterday only added further confirmation of what a shameless lying piece of shit you are? Good for you to finally admit it.HHusky said:
Now you want to quarrel about points of agreement. People do avoid you at family gatherings, don't they?SFGbob said:
I haven't changed my argument at all .HHusky said:
I understand you haven’t changed your argument. What happened today didn’t offer your argument any new support. You thought it did. Embarrassing.SFGbob said:
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct.
Why the big act that you give a fuck about Russian collusion Kunt when you have no problem with Hillary's collusion? The question too tough for a lying mouthy Kunt to answer. -
Russia and China wanted Hillary to win
CHANGE MY MIND


