Flynn Filing Shows Mueller Team Manipulated Transcript in Report…
Comments
-
HHusky said:
Lionel TrotHusky can’t even wait 30 minutes for a response he’s so worked up about a framed man who gave 33 years to the military being set free. How boring.
-
So nothing to get my nose rubbed in. Disappointed!NorthwestFresh said:HHusky said:
Lionel TrotHusky can’t even wait 30 minutes for a response he’s so worked up about a framed man who gave 33 years to the military being set free. How boring. -
His answer appeared to be go fuck yourself.HHusky said:
So Vlad's answer is also No.NorthwestFresh said:
They withheld exculpatory evidence. That’s not even being challenged. You Soviets have always prosecuted political enemies, Sergei. Jail the opposition if you can’t get the votes. That’s why you are willing to lie and destroy the life of a Kavanaugh. Just so you can abort black babies and control those “savages,” as your hero Margaret Sanger called them.HHusky said: -
They withheld evidence that showed he wasn't guilty of doing what he was charged with doing. They threatened to prosecute his son in order to get him to enter a coerced guilty plea, but in the mind of O'Keefed the fucking hack that's not prosecutorial misconduct.
-
What prosecutorial misconduct?
-
This is a big part of why DOJ dropped charges and Van Gack resigned. Official documents. Leftists simply don’t care about equal justice. Also Bob, you know @HHusky well enough to know he has even stated he’s willing to lie to advance his cause. I got that admission out of him on The Shed. It’s going to be a very Chinteresting summer on the west coast.SFGbob said:They withheld evidence that showed he wasn't guilty of doing what he was charged with doing. They threatened to prosecute his son in order to get him to enter a coerced guilty plea, but in the mind of O'Keefed the fucking hack that's not prosecutorial misconduct.
-
The publicly reported basis for dismissing the case is that the FBI didn't have a valid purpose for asking Flynn the questions he lied in response to. Or as Daddy calls it, "Exoneration!"SFGbob said:They withheld evidence that showed he wasn't guilty of doing what he was charged with doing. They threaten to prosecute his son in order to get him to enter a coerced guilty plea, but in the mind of O'Keefed the fucking hack that's not prosecutorial misconduct.
There is absolutely nothing new to report with respect to your shrill cries of "Prosecutorial Misconduct!"
But your triumphant belly flop is duly noted. -
That's a good Kunt move those goal post. This is where O'Keefed gets exposed as a lying ass all while declaring that he really got it right.HHusky said:
The publicly reported basis for dismissing the case is that the FBI didn't have a valid purpose for asking Flynn the questions he lied in response to. Or as Daddy calls it, "Exoneration!"SFGbob said:They withheld evidence that showed he wasn't guilty of doing what he was charged with doing. They threaten to prosecute his son in order to get him to enter a coerced guilty plea, but in the mind of O'Keefed the fucking hack that's not prosecutorial misconduct.
There is absolutely nothing new to report with respect to your shrill cries of "Prosecutorial Misconduct!"
But your triumphant belly flop is duly noted.
Explains what an unethical piece of shit attorney you are that you believe withholding exculpatory evidence from the defense isn't a form of prosecutorial misconduct. -
There was also no crime that was being investigated. This was just like with Scooter Libby. Lie and set him up with a perjury trap combined with prosecutorial misconduct. and the agents didn't believe he lies. Oh, and threatening to prosecute his son without telling the judge about that in the plea deal is a definite no-no. But threatening to bankrupt more of the General's family is definitely not misconduct to a POS leftard like the counselor.
-
Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
Remember when Mueller was the savior of America?
His failure is now complete. -
I understand you haven’t changed your argument. What happened today didn’t offer your argument any new support. You thought it did. Embarrassing.SFGbob said:
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
I haven't changed my argument at all Kunt. I called it prosecutorial misconduct over a year ago while you sucked Mueller's wizened cock and claimed I was getting "desperate." Prosecutorial misconduct was already established. Yesterday just added more fuel to the fire of what a shameless fucking hack you are.HHusky said:
I understand you haven’t changed your argument. What happened today didn’t offer your argument any new support. You thought it did. Embarrassing.SFGbob said:
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
Now you want to quarrel about points of agreement. People do avoid you at family gatherings, don't they?SFGbob said:
I haven't changed my argument at all .HHusky said:
I understand you haven’t changed your argument. What happened today didn’t offer your argument any new support. You thought it did. Embarrassing.SFGbob said:
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
You agree that sucked Mueller wizened cock and that yesterday only added further confirmation of what a shameless lying piece of shit you are? Good for you to finally admit it.HHusky said:
Now you want to quarrel about points of agreement. People do avoid you at family gatherings, don't they?SFGbob said:
I haven't changed my argument at all .HHusky said:
I understand you haven’t changed your argument. What happened today didn’t offer your argument any new support. You thought it did. Embarrassing.SFGbob said:
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
Were you ever clever?SFGbob said:
You agree that sucked Mueller wizened cock and that yesterday only added further confirmation of what a shameless lying piece of shit you are? Good for you to finally admit it.HHusky said:
Now you want to quarrel about points of agreement. People do avoid you at family gatherings, don't they?SFGbob said:
I haven't changed my argument at all .HHusky said:
I understand you haven’t changed your argument. What happened today didn’t offer your argument any new support. You thought it did. Embarrassing.SFGbob said:
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct. -
Were you ever not a lying piece of crap?HHusky said:
Were you ever clever?SFGbob said:
You agree that sucked Mueller wizened cock and that yesterday only added further confirmation of what a shameless lying piece of shit you are? Good for you to finally admit it.HHusky said:
Now you want to quarrel about points of agreement. People do avoid you at family gatherings, don't they?SFGbob said:
I haven't changed my argument at all .HHusky said:
I understand you haven’t changed your argument. What happened today didn’t offer your argument any new support. You thought it did. Embarrassing.SFGbob said:
I'm victorious every time I engage with you. There was prosecutorial misconduct in this case. I didn't need today's events to prove that. I said so months ago, while you stuck your head up your fucking ass, as per usual, and claimed there was none.HHusky said:
Madam, you announced some sort of message bored victory based on today's events. Prosecutorial misconduct was not a basis for any of those events. I understand that you are embarrassed. But simply rearguing that there was misconduct because the DOJ reversed itself on the criminality of Genral Flynn's lies isn't a substitute for "victory" you seek.SFGbob said:Van Grack, however, failed to produce to Flynn’s attorneys and the court the newly unsealed documents revealing that the FBI had closed its Flynn investigation in January 2017 after it “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts,” only to have it reopened by former FBI agent Strzok, who was later fired for misconduct.
Naaaaah, that's not misconduct.
Why the big act that you give a fuck about Russian collusion Kunt when you have no problem with Hillary's collusion? The question too tough for a lying mouthy Kunt to answer. -
Russia and China wanted Hillary to win
CHANGE MY MIND
