Kim commends Daniels for buying in....
Comments
-
FTFYHe_Needs_More_Time said:
Ummm that shit was predicted early in the offseason when the schedule came out. We knew the annual three game losing streak was going to happen and UW was going to get blown away by a nuclear warhead.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That shit was predicted BEFORE the Stanford game here.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
El oh el. Anyone still in support of sark after the asu game is legally retarded. That performance was vintage Fat Armenian BastardHe_Needs_More_Time said:
The cunt has me blocked. On game day he tweeted this is it husky football is officially back.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Did Kim respond to your trolling on the twatter?He_Needs_More_Time said:Someone who is creative needs to make a Hardcore Husky vs Kim voice overs on this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7U4RNZyukKM
Immediately after asu loss I retweeted that and he blocked me. I didn't even get a chance to shit on him. -
Hijacking threads is a huge problem we're having. It's driving people away
No you dumb fuck that isn't what is driving people away. It's your North Korea attitude towards everything that is driving people away.
It's the fact that you are driving people away like Tequilla who isn't at all a trouble maker and his only crime was pointing out that Sark isn't a good coach.
That is what is driving people away. Your obvious agenda towards Sark and against Petersen is what fucking drives customers away. -
Seriously. How could you paint Tequilla as a problem? Kim should be happy he even posts there at all. I know that is a classic line here, but it's true. At least Tequilla puts some effort into making good posts. He starts discussions on your board too and there were posters who care about his thoughts and opinions.He_Needs_More_Time said:Hijacking threads is a huge problem we're having. It's driving people away
No you dumb fuck that isn't what is driving people away. It's your North Korea attitude towards everything that is driving people away.
It's the fact that you are driving people away like Tequilla who isn't at all a trouble maker and his only crime was pointing out that Sark isn't a good coach.
That is what is driving people away. Your obvious agenda towards Sark and against Petersen is what fucking drives customers away. -
Up until that point, I was getting burned out and was going to take a step back after LOI day for a while because of how fucktarded people were with Sark, etc. and completely unable to grasp the fact that having expectations are OK.
Then after that exchange, I was dead set on ending my membership after LOI day. Deleting a post of mine and calling it threadjacking I have no problem agreeing to disagree. Making shit up, throwing out threats like "it's not going to end well," boldface lying, and the inability to answer simple questions is grounds for taking off the gloves and rolling. Particularly when you factor in that a) I pay to be treated like shit and b) without being an ego centric jerk, I was one of the more valuable contributors to the site.
Each day that goes by I'm more and more happy to disassociate myself from that ownership group. -
The other thing that got NICK HOLT AWESOME by the end was how the Kim Jong Vino and Mr. 81% would go out of their way to take personal shots at me left and right. After doing that combined with moderating which of my posts would actually hit the board, then other idiots that I'd never even seen post before would speak up and try to clown as well. It was the definition of fighting with one hand behind your back.
The pussiest shit of it all was that after RESPECTFULLY responding to Messers Vino and 81% when they'd take personal shots, that those responses would make them so bad that they'd never get approved to be posted.
Talk about being a yellow belly pussy ass bitch. -
If anyone has any doubts that site is North Korea-esque, they deemed Tequila as a fucking trouble maker. 'Nuff said.
-
Even around these parts, the closest way I come across as a trouble maker is that I embrace the ability to use loose language ...
Any disrespect that I direct to the Lemon Party trio was driven AFTER they made it clear that they declared war on me.
When the facts are on your side, you have no problem pointing those facts out and then sitting back and watch the spinning and twisting commence. -
You have all the screenshots you need.Tequilla said:Vegas - Yep, that happened. Here's a PM conversation that I had with someone involved with the site (the name isn't really important in the grand scheme of things)
In the first image, you'll have to read from the bottom up (3 total messages); the final message is the last one. -
Kim Grinolds @KimGrinolds 8h
All this talk about the Seahawk's schedule, @UW_Football should start off 4-0 Don't sleep on Pete -
I love the part about getting Legal and Security involved (security? are they escorting you out of the building? huh?).
But as far as legal....I'm dying to see the results of the historic Doogman v. Tequilla case that will set the precedent for thread hijacking across the internet as we know it. It might even become Grisham's next best-seller. -
I'm sure that by legal he was referencing using their "paid info" in other locations.
Now of course, back in 2008 when the infamous "taking off your gloves" post was generated and Race was using it all over the place, I told Kim that he should take greater control of that kind of behavior. He just ignored it.
Not a good precedent to set ... at some point people might do it to you. -
Movie idea:
"Gloves Off"
starring
Gregory Peck as Tequilla
Chris Kattan as Ken Griswold
Synopsis:
The story of one man's struggle to be heard against a forum full of twisters. Loosely based on the landmark case of Doogman v. Tequilla.
Critically hailed:
"Anyone with half a brain can see that this will be the movie event of the summer." - HH News Tribune
"I loved climactic scene where Tequilla takes off the gloves and rolls in front of a jury of his peers! He really got into a pissing match!" -LuteOlsen4Prez
"Quite frankly, I'm VERY happy that I don't know him." -Race Bannon -
You were the worst kind of Huskie fanTequilla said:I'm sure that by legal he was referencing using their "paid info" in other locations.
Now of course, back in 2008 when the infamous "taking off your gloves" post was generated and Race was using it all over the place, I told Kim that he should take greater control of that kind of behavior. He just ignored it.
Not a good precedent to set ... at some point people might do it to you.
-
How was I the worst kind of Huskie fan?
And BTW, if you actually re-read the "gloves" poast, you'll recall that at that point many on this bored were all over Pool Boy at that point.
The bottom line was that the UW wasn't in a good spot at that point. Fortunately we've had better leadership and direction since then. It was glaringly lacking for almost a decade prior to that. -
Great post. So many gems in this one. Lol at Chris Kattan as Griswald.Dardanus said:Movie idea:
"Gloves Off"
starring
Gregory Peck as Tequilla
Chris Kattan as Ken Griswold
Synopsis:
The story of one man's struggle to be heard against a forum full of twisters. Loosely based on the landmark case of Doogman v. Tequilla.
Critically hailed:
"Anyone with half a brain can see that this will be the movie event of the summer." - HH News Tribune
"I loved climactic scene where Tequilla takes off the gloves and rolls in front of a jury of his peers! He really got into a pissing match!" -LuteOlsen4Prez
"Quite frankly, I'm VERY happy that I don't know him." -Race Bannon
-
Crying to Kim to censor Race is a classic Section14a/DiggyDawg caliber move.Tequilla said:How was I the worst kind of Huskie fan?
And BTW, if you actually re-read the "gloves" poast, you'll recall that at that point many on this bored were all over Pool Boy at that point.
The bottom line was that the UW wasn't in a good spot at that point. Fortunately we've had better leadership and direction since then. It was glaringly lacking for almost a decade prior to that.
Thankfully, you have grown since then, hence the past tense.
-
In fairness, I wasn't "crying" to Kim Jong Vino regarding Race and having him censored. I legitimately couldn't care about that.
What I DID care about was that Kim Jong Vino had just made a big deal about civility on the boards, not crossing lines, etc. and what Race was doing was clearly crossing those lines while Kim Jong Vino sat back and did nothing because at that point Race was in his good graces and therefore he could do what he wanted.
The lesson as always is that Kim Jong Vino will say and mean one thing except when he doesn't.