goalposts
Comments
-
It’s not, and never would be 2 million deaths. You like being lied to. It helps you sleep and night thinking daddy is protecting you.HHusky said:
So you would like to avoid the question. Telling.MikeDamone said:
It would be better for people like you. Who cheerlead for a virus because orange man bad.HHusky said:
Would 2.2 million deaths and many times that more illnesses have been way better for the economy?RaceBannon said:You know who else hid behind science?
Slave traders and nazis
It’s a Hail Mary. -
Bitchfork is an immigrant here, xenophobeHHusky said:
I don't speak whatever language this is.Pitchfork51 said:
Like 10 total more and no destroyed economy. So yes.HHusky said:
Would 2.2 million deaths and many times that more illnesses have been way better for the economy?RaceBannon said:You know who else hid behind science?
Slave traders and nazis -
Good poontGrundleStiltzkin said:
Bitchfork is an immigrant here, xenophobeHHusky said:
I don't speak whatever language this is.Pitchfork51 said:
Like 10 total more and no destroyed economy. So yes.HHusky said:
Would 2.2 million deaths and many times that more illnesses have been way better for the economy?RaceBannon said:You know who else hid behind science?
Slave traders and nazis
I would argue he's naive and borderline racist
Imo -
Death is more permanent than unemployment in my experience. But you should make the argument that 2.2 million deaths and many times more illness would have been worth it because . . . [this is where you explain your reasoning]RaceBannon said:
I know that 10 million unemployed and counting and the destruction of our economy has fucked 10s of millions of peopleHHusky said:
Would 2.2 million deaths and many times that more illnesses have been way better for the economy?RaceBannon said:You know who else hid behind science?
Slave traders and nazis
That's a fact, slave trader
You're still peddling bullshit. -
So it's an inability to express a coherent thought. Okay.Pitchfork51 said:
English motherfuckerHHusky said:
I don't speak whatever language this is.Pitchfork51 said:
Like 10 total more and no destroyed economy. So yes.HHusky said:
Would 2.2 million deaths and many times that more illnesses have been way better for the economy?RaceBannon said:You know who else hid behind science?
Slave traders and nazis -
What 2.2 million deaths?HHusky said:
Death is more permanent than unemployment in my experience. But you should make the argument that 2.2 million deaths and many times more illness would have been worth it because . . . [this is where you explain your reasoning]RaceBannon said:
I know that 10 million unemployed and counting and the destruction of our economy has fucked 10s of millions of peopleHHusky said:
Would 2.2 million deaths and many times that more illnesses have been way better for the economy?RaceBannon said:You know who else hid behind science?
Slave traders and nazis
That's a fact, slave trader
You're still peddling bullshit.
The damage and carnage to people from the "cure" is real
Your models aren't -
Why would Daddy lie to me?MikeDamone said:
It’s not, and never would be 2 million deaths. You like being lied to. It helps you sleep and night thinking daddy is protecting you.HHusky said:
So you would like to avoid the question. Telling.MikeDamone said:
It would be better for people like you. Who cheerlead for a virus because orange man bad.HHusky said:
Would 2.2 million deaths and many times that more illnesses have been way better for the economy?RaceBannon said:You know who else hid behind science?
Slave traders and nazis
It’s a Hail Mary. -
So Orange Man is a liar?RaceBannon said:
What 2.2 million deaths?HHusky said:
Death is more permanent than unemployment in my experience. But you should make the argument that 2.2 million deaths and many times more illness would have been worth it because . . . [this is where you explain your reasoning]RaceBannon said:
I know that 10 million unemployed and counting and the destruction of our economy has fucked 10s of millions of peopleHHusky said:
Would 2.2 million deaths and many times that more illnesses have been way better for the economy?RaceBannon said:You know who else hid behind science?
Slave traders and nazis
That's a fact, slave trader
You're still peddling bullshit.
The damage and carnage to people from the "cure" is real
Your models aren't -
Here’s my reasoning. If it was communicable as stated, and that figure hasn’t varied too much, and we hadn’t mitigated really at all for 3 months, 2.2 million dead doesn’t make sense.HHusky said:
Death is more permanent than unemployment in my experience. But you should make the argument that 2.2 million deaths and many times more illness would have been worth it because . . . [this is where you explain your reasoning]RaceBannon said:
I know that 10 million unemployed and counting and the destruction of our economy has fucked 10s of millions of peopleHHusky said:
Would 2.2 million deaths and many times that more illnesses have been way better for the economy?RaceBannon said:You know who else hid behind science?
Slave traders and nazis
That's a fact, slave trader
You're still peddling bullshit. -
It's an inability to respond in a manner that doesn't involve talking shit to fags like uHHusky said:
So it's an inability to express a coherent thought. Okay.Pitchfork51 said:
English motherfuckerHHusky said:
I don't speak whatever language this is.Pitchfork51 said:
Like 10 total more and no destroyed economy. So yes.HHusky said:
Would 2.2 million deaths and many times that more illnesses have been way better for the economy?RaceBannon said:You know who else hid behind science?
Slave traders and nazis




