Maximum Carnage Week Game Thread

Swaye · April 2020

Game time fuckers.

edit: Making it the official game thread and pinning so you can get all your piles of plague bodies updates throughout this week of ULTIMATE DEATH!

RaceBannon · April 2020

Deathweek 2020

Monday's opening totals

PurpleThrobber · April 2020

Officials stats* get posted at 4PM.

*as adjusted by the AAU scorekeepers.

MikeDamone · April 2020

I’m hearing if it’s not this week, then it will be next week.

Fire_Marshall_Bill · April 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04F4xlWSFh0

YellowSnow · April 2020

So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

HHusky · April 2020

HHusky · April 2020

YellowSnow said:
So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?

Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

What would the count be without the "overreaction"?

RaceBannon · April 2020

HHusky said:

show previous quotes
YellowSnow said:
So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?
Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

What would the count be without the "overreaction"?

Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

HHusky · April 2020

RaceBannon said:

show previous quotes
HHusky said:

YellowSnow said:
So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?
Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.

RaceBannon · April 2020

RaceBannon · April 2020

HHusky said:

show previous quotes
RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

YellowSnow said:
So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?
Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.

So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required

HHusky · April 2020

RaceBannon said:

show previous quotes
HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

YellowSnow said:
So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?
Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required

I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.

RaceBannon · April 2020

HHusky said:

show previous quotes
RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

YellowSnow said:
So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?
Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.

So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said

GrundleStiltzkin · April 2020

This is a good read
https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2020/04/06/ihme-sharply-reduces-projected-hospitalizations-data-shows-nys-curve-flattening/

HHusky · April 2020

RaceBannon said:

show previous quotes
HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

YellowSnow said:
So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?
Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said

Until we run in traffic, how can we be sure that it is dangerous?

Bob_C · April 2020

There’s definitely context things going around in the data reporting. The death output seems to be worst case and then when it comes in less, social distancing is being lauded. I seem to recall a time where the deaths that were being projected were with the social distancing assumption built in, so that can’t be the reason for variance in actuals.

Part of the issue is too many models with wildly different assumptions and reporting taking pieces from each as if it were an integrated model.

Fire_Marshall_Bill · April 2020

GrundleStiltzkin said:
This is a good read
https://hotair.com/archives/allahpundit/2020/04/06/ihme-sharply-reduces-projected-hospitalizations-data-shows-nys-curve-flattening/

Andrew Combover and Bill Deblah are heroes now, despite bad orange man. They flattened the curve thanks to their brilliance. Never mind that Deblasio said everything was normal well into March.

DoogieMcDoogerson · April 2020

I find this chart interesting and the commentary describing it interesting. This is probably something the news should pick up on but it doesn't fit their narrative. "Deaths show by date of onset."

PurpleThrobber · April 2020

HHusky said:

show previous quotes
RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

YellowSnow said:
So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?
Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
Until we run in traffic, how can we be sure that it is dangerous?

Please. Go test.

MelloDawg · April 2020

HHusky said:

show previous quotes
RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

YellowSnow said:
So what does the cordwood count need to be by week’s end to count as max carnage?
Next Monday? We'll probably be at 25,000. Maybe that's optimistic.

What would the count be without the "overreaction"?
Seems like you would have that answer to justify destroying the economy

I'm sure a couple million (more?) deaths and tens of millions of cases would have no effect on the economy.
So you don't have any idea if destroying the economy was required
I just applied 1918 percentages to our current population. Of course even in the olden days, people knew viruses were contagious and they "overreacted". Cost Seattle a Stanley Cup, and had some less significant adverse effects as well.
So you have no idea if any of this made any difference. Like I said
Until we run in traffic, how can we be sure that it is dangerous?

What do you have to lose? I may try it, I’ll have to talk to my doctor.

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Maximum Carnage Week Game Thread

Comments