Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
What UW model?
Comments
-
Where do you get the idea that they won't?HHusky said:
Where do you get the idea that "only" an extra 100,000 people will die if we just operate normally?Dude61 said:How many millions of job losses are acceptable to save 100,000 lives?
You want to shut it down again you need to prove it. Not theorize about it -
Mortality data out of Spain and Italy shows their official statistics a yuge undercount. And still only 3k in China? lol...haie said:50k worldwide up from 37k over the week. Can someone please explain to me how an exponential equation works?
Still waiting on this mountain of bodies that somehow justifies the over 6 million unemployed Americans. -
Like usual. Race is right.RaceBannon said:
Where do you get the idea that they won't?HHusky said:
Where do you get the idea that "only" an extra 100,000 people will die if we just operate normally?Dude61 said:How many millions of job losses are acceptable to save 100,000 lives?
You want to shut it down again you need to prove it. Not theorize about it -
Every model I've seen says millions of deaths if we do nothing. I know you guys hate expertise.RaceBannon said:
Where do you get the idea that they won't?HHusky said:
Where do you get the idea that "only" an extra 100,000 people will die if we just operate normally?Dude61 said:How many millions of job losses are acceptable to save 100,000 lives?
You want to shut it down again you need to prove it. Not theorize about it -
Awesome thanks for the updateHHusky said:
Every model I've seen says millions of deaths if we do nothing. I know you guys hate expertise.RaceBannon said:
Where do you get the idea that they won't?HHusky said:
Where do you get the idea that "only" an extra 100,000 people will die if we just operate normally?Dude61 said:How many millions of job losses are acceptable to save 100,000 lives?
You want to shut it down again you need to prove it. Not theorize about it
So we shut down every winter because models.
What expertise? -
Epidemiological expertise.RaceBannon said:
Awesome thanks for the updateHHusky said:
Every model I've seen says millions of deaths if we do nothing. I know you guys hate expertise.RaceBannon said:
Where do you get the idea that they won't?HHusky said:
Where do you get the idea that "only" an extra 100,000 people will die if we just operate normally?Dude61 said:How many millions of job losses are acceptable to save 100,000 lives?
You want to shut it down again you need to prove it. Not theorize about it
So we shut down every winter because models.
What expertise? -
This is what I think the plan is.
1. Shut down for another month or two, basically until the hospitals have enough equipment and people are used to washing hands and not breathing down each other's necks.
2. Start opening most services again with the caveat that old people like Race need to know they will have a high chance of getting fucked up if they catch it
3. Slowly build up herd immunity through the people that aren't old and frail until a vaccine is ready
The world won't be able to afford to stay shut down through even the summer. No way we make it until a vaccine is available. These next couple months are here to ensure we have as many ICU beds and ventilators in place as possible.
We basically try to limit exposure as much as you can while trying to act normal until either 70% of the population has caught it or there is a vaccine. -
Milestone?RaceBannon said:Grim
-
Alwa
Always about the brothers with you...RaceBannon said:Grim
-
Champagne corks popping in the HHusky basement! Great news!
