Big if true ..
Five years ago, Italian state owned media Company, Rai – Radiotelevisione Italiana, exposed dark efforts by China on viruses. The video, which was broadcast in November, 2015, showed how Chinese scientists were doing biological experiments on a SARS connected virus believed to be Coronavirus, derived from bats and mice, asking whether it was worth the risk in order to be able to modify the virus for compatibility with human organisms.
Comments
-
Fuck those guys.
-
This was my conspiracy theory 6 weeks ago.
-
my conspiracy theory is 700,000 infected and 200,000 dead because a guy in a market in Wuhan ate a bat
-
Sure.gifLebamDawg said:my conspiracy theory is 700,000 infected and 200,000 dead because a guy in a market in Wuhan ate a bat
-
We've gone from 37,000 deaths worldwide from before the weekend to 42,000 worldwide today. Where's the mountain of bodies. 1.5 weeks to go, but still.
-
I'm hearing they are stacking bodies like cordwood. That's just what I'm hearing, don't twist.haie said:We've gone from 37,000 deaths worldwide from before the weekend to 42,000 worldwide today. Where's the mountain of bodies. 1.5 weeks to go, but still.
-
The worldwide death count was at 27k before last weekend.haie said:We've gone from 37,000 deaths worldwide from before the weekend to 42,000 worldwide today. Where's the mountain of bodies. 1.5 weeks to go, but still.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-toll/ -
It's grim
-
Would it shock anyone that China enjoys killing people and especially Americans??? I would be shocked I tell you!
-
Grim milestoneRaceBannon said:It's grim
-
Grim soaring milestone
-
Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
-
salemcoog said:
Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
-
That is certainly a chinteresting response Mr. Bannon. But what might be some less lethal responses?RaceBannon said:salemcoog said:Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
-
salemcoog said:
That is certainly a chinteresting response Mr. Bannon. But what might be some less lethal responses?RaceBannon said:salemcoog said:Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
-
More serious?salemcoog said:
That is certainly a chinteresting response Mr. Bannon. But what might be some less lethal responses?RaceBannon said:salemcoog said:Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
Its not what we do to China its what we do for ourselves. Move the supply chains to countries that don't want to destroy us. Close our markets to China products. Embargo travel from China to the US
Develop new markets. Build the American economy to buy our own shit made with good wages by people who can afford to buy our shit
America First and Forever
-
Keep doing what was winning. Under Trump, the United States was making great strides. Stop selling out our economy to the Chinese. Equalize the playing field through tax incentives and tariffs. Bring American manufacturing back home!salemcoog said:
That is certainly a chinteresting response Mr. Bannon. But what might be some less lethal responses?RaceBannon said:salemcoog said:Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
-
Moving the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals and other health care peripherals back to the United States is economic nonsense. There aren't enough subsidies in the budget to sway manufacturers into making that a reality.DuckHHunterisafag said:
Keep doing what was winning. Under Trump, the United States was making great strides. Stop selling out our economy to the Chinese. Equalize the playing field through tax incentives and tariffs. Bring American manufacturing back home!salemcoog said:
That is certainly a chinteresting response Mr. Bannon. But what might be some less lethal responses?RaceBannon said:salemcoog said:Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
Let's just get it the fuck out of China. Plenty of other third world manufacturing hubs out there that don't grab us by the balls with threats to our national security. -
Extend a hand to mexico. Fix the border and supply jobs. Keep products on the same continent.RaceBannon said:
More serious?salemcoog said:
That is certainly a chinteresting response Mr. Bannon. But what might be some less lethal responses?RaceBannon said:salemcoog said:Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
Its not what we do to China its what we do for ourselves. Move the supply chains to countries that don't want to destroy us. Close our markets to China products. Embargo travel from China to the US
Develop new markets. Build the American economy to buy our own shit made with good wages by people who can afford to buy our shit
America First and Forever -
Quite honestly I don't disagree although getting vital medical shit in our own country could be considered national defense at this pointGreenRiverGatorz said:
Moving the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals and other health care peripherals back to the United States is economic nonsense. There aren't enough subsidies in the budget to sway manufacturers into making that a reality.DuckHHunterisafag said:
Keep doing what was winning. Under Trump, the United States was making great strides. Stop selling out our economy to the Chinese. Equalize the playing field through tax incentives and tariffs. Bring American manufacturing back home!salemcoog said:
That is certainly a chinteresting response Mr. Bannon. But what might be some less lethal responses?RaceBannon said:salemcoog said:Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
Let's just get it the fuck out of China. Plenty of other third world manufacturing hubs out there that don't grab us by the balls with threats to our national security. -
It absolutely should be viewed through the lens of national defense. The fact that we're somewhat beholden to China is what's so scary about the current situation. Now as is the case with all trade matters, there are plenty of medical finished goods that we export to China, among other economic incentivizers.RaceBannon said:
Quite honestly I don't disagree although getting vital medical shit in our own country could be considered national defense at this pointGreenRiverGatorz said:
Moving the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals and other health care peripherals back to the United States is economic nonsense. There aren't enough subsidies in the budget to sway manufacturers into making that a reality.DuckHHunterisafag said:
Keep doing what was winning. Under Trump, the United States was making great strides. Stop selling out our economy to the Chinese. Equalize the playing field through tax incentives and tariffs. Bring American manufacturing back home!salemcoog said:
That is certainly a chinteresting response Mr. Bannon. But what might be some less lethal responses?RaceBannon said:salemcoog said:Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
Let's just get it the fuck out of China. Plenty of other third world manufacturing hubs out there that don't grab us by the balls with threats to our national security.
So it's definitely a cold war of sorts in the sense that "if you fuck up our covid response by withholding crucial drugs/equipment then we'll kill your people by withholding our cancer therapies" is always in the back pocket. Thankfully I don't think either country is too interested in playing that game at the moment. But going forward, it's always going to benefit national security the more "diversified" our supply chain is. -
Does China actually give a shit about their masses? Wouldn't they rather see them dead?GreenRiverGatorz said:
It absolutely should be viewed through the lens of national defense. The fact that we're somewhat beholden to China is what's so scary about the current situation. Now as is the case with all trade matters, there are plenty of medical finished goods that we export to China, among other economic incentivizers.RaceBannon said:
Quite honestly I don't disagree although getting vital medical shit in our own country could be considered national defense at this pointGreenRiverGatorz said:
Moving the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals and other health care peripherals back to the United States is economic nonsense. There aren't enough subsidies in the budget to sway manufacturers into making that a reality.DuckHHunterisafag said:
Keep doing what was winning. Under Trump, the United States was making great strides. Stop selling out our economy to the Chinese. Equalize the playing field through tax incentives and tariffs. Bring American manufacturing back home!salemcoog said:
That is certainly a chinteresting response Mr. Bannon. But what might be some less lethal responses?RaceBannon said:salemcoog said:Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
Let's just get it the fuck out of China. Plenty of other third world manufacturing hubs out there that don't grab us by the balls with threats to our national security.
So it's definitely a cold war of sorts in the sense that "if you fuck up our covid response by withholding crucial drugs/equipment then we'll kill your people by withholding our cancer therapies" is always in the back pocket. Thankfully I don't think either country is too interested in playing that game at the moment. But going forward, it's always going to benefit national security the more "diversified" our supply chain is. -
Pardon fucking me for not having any sympathy for costs the Pharmaceutical industry may have to bear.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Moving the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals and other health care peripherals back to the United States is economic nonsense. There aren't enough subsidies in the budget to sway manufacturers into making that a reality.DuckHHunterisafag said:
Keep doing what was winning. Under Trump, the United States was making great strides. Stop selling out our economy to the Chinese. Equalize the playing field through tax incentives and tariffs. Bring American manufacturing back home!salemcoog said:
That is certainly a chinteresting response Mr. Bannon. But what might be some less lethal responses?RaceBannon said:salemcoog said:Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
Let's just get it the fuck out of China. Plenty of other third world manufacturing hubs out there that don't grab us by the balls with threats to our national security.
If they didn't have monopolistic control - at the behest of Congress - over their pricing, I might be more sympathetic.
As of now, fuck them and come home in the quickest manner possible. -
I say we wipe any China debt off the books but I don't know if that will be enough to compensate us for what they have done.
-
Okay. How do you propose we bring them back?pawz said:
Pardon fucking me for not having any sympathy for costs the Pharmaceutical industry may have to bear.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Moving the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals and other health care peripherals back to the United States is economic nonsense. There aren't enough subsidies in the budget to sway manufacturers into making that a reality.DuckHHunterisafag said:
Keep doing what was winning. Under Trump, the United States was making great strides. Stop selling out our economy to the Chinese. Equalize the playing field through tax incentives and tariffs. Bring American manufacturing back home!salemcoog said:
That is certainly a chinteresting response Mr. Bannon. But what might be some less lethal responses?RaceBannon said:salemcoog said:Let's move on a bit. Once we get on the down side of the curve and are not in terminal reaction mode, what should the US response be to China?
Let's just get it the fuck out of China. Plenty of other third world manufacturing hubs out there that don't grab us by the balls with threats to our national security.
If they didn't have monopolistic control - at the behest of Congress - over their pricing, I might be more sympathetic.
As of now, fuck them and come home in the quickest manner possible. -
This is easy, kick them out of the WTO. Permanently, until they actually have free markets and democratic elections.
-
Why are you repeating fringe conspiracy theories that were rightfully used to discredit that far-right nut Tom Cotton?pawz said:https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/chinese-biological-experiments-infect-humans-coronavirus-exposed-2015-italian-state
Five years ago, Italian state owned media Company, Rai – Radiotelevisione Italiana, exposed dark efforts by China on viruses. The video, which was broadcast in November, 2015, showed how Chinese scientists were doing biological experiments on a SARS connected virus believed to be Coronavirus, derived from bats and mice, asking whether it was worth the risk in order to be able to modify the virus for compatibility with human organisms. -
H loves him some Chi ComsSFGbob said:
Why are you repeating fringe conspiracy theories that were rightfully used to discredit that far-right nut Tom Cotton?pawz said:https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/chinese-biological-experiments-infect-humans-coronavirus-exposed-2015-italian-state
Five years ago, Italian state owned media Company, Rai – Radiotelevisione Italiana, exposed dark efforts by China on viruses. The video, which was broadcast in November, 2015, showed how Chinese scientists were doing biological experiments on a SARS connected virus believed to be Coronavirus, derived from bats and mice, asking whether it was worth the risk in order to be able to modify the virus for compatibility with human organisms. -
-
It was at 35-37k all weekend.insinceredawg said:
The worldwide death count was at 27k before last weekend.haie said:We've gone from 37,000 deaths worldwide from before the weekend to 42,000 worldwide today. Where's the mountain of bodies. 1.5 weeks to go, but still.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-toll/
I guess I don't understand exponential growth but even 42k - 27k still makes my point for me.
