Roll out "secondary is young this year excuse" again.... and again.... and again...
Comments
-
-
Sark peddled excuses. Petersen won't. He'll just have someone else ready to play.
The days of bullshit football are over at Washington. -
Are you saying they aren't?
-
propagandadflea said:Sark peddled excuses. Petersen won't. He'll just have someone else ready to play.
The days of bullshit football are over at Washington. -
Can I use the horse pooping gif if I substitute the woman's head with AOG?
-
Propaganda is what Sark was feeding you while you were busy polishing his sack, and the Huskies were blowing an 18 point lead against the fucking Coogers.ApostleofGrief said:
propagandadflea said:Sark peddled excuses. Petersen won't. He'll just have someone else ready to play.
The days of bullshit football are over at Washington.
A .876 winning percentage - in any conference - isn't propaganda, dumbass. It's a record that speaks for itself. If you don't hear it, it's because your head is in your ass. -
AoG thinks Peterman would struggle at CWU. Sure, he's succeeded in the WAC and MW, but that doesn't mean that he is going to have success in the loaded Great Northwest Athletic Conference....dflea said:
Propaganda is what Sark was feeding you while you were busy polishing his sack, and the Huskies were blowing an 18 point lead against the fucking Coogers.ApostleofGrief said:
propagandadflea said:Sark peddled excuses. Petersen won't. He'll just have someone else ready to play.
The days of bullshit football are over at Washington.
A .876 winning percentage - in any conference - isn't propaganda, dumbass. It's a record that speaks for itself. If you don't hear it, it's because your head is in your ass. -
The young excuse or any excuse I think will be dead now. Remember the two main people driving these excuses were the head coach always. Ty would say he lacked Bullets, Sark would passive aggressively bring up 0-12.dflea said:Sark peddled excuses. Petersen won't. He'll just have someone else ready to play.
The days of bullshit football are over at Washington.
The other person driving them were the Doog leaders like Kim and the Doogs would follow. Well Kim won't give any excuses for Petersen. If the secondary is young that means Sark fucked up and he won't blame Sark for anything. Instead he's going to act like this is the most talented team we've had since 1991 so if Petersen succeeds all credit goes to Sark and if he comes up short he can go "see told you guys".
Like RoadDawg said it's personal with Kim. The HHB's like the Petersen hire, hated Sark so he's going to do what he can to put all the success of the team on Sark and the failures on Petersen. -
Our secondary (scholarship athletes only) right now is:
Travell Dixon (RS-SR)
Marcus Peters (RS-JR)
Brandon Beaver (RS-SO)
Kevin King (TR-SO)
Trevor Walker (TR-SO)
Jermaine Kelly (RS-FR)
Six scholarship players for the remainder of the Spring with 2 being upperclassmen (and Dixon being a JUCO transfer, so not really the same kinda upperclassman that Peters is). Clearly our biggest weakness moving into 2014, so it's nice to see that Petersen addressed depth by bringing in 7 DBs for this fall. Also worth noting that Brian Clay is a JR who transferred from Hawaii who's had a good off-season. There'll be depth when the season rolls around, which is what we need more than anything.
Point being, 8 out of 13 players will be freshman in the secondary this season. However, that youth shouldn't be an excuse for this team. We'll have talent out there and a competent DBs coach out there getting them prepared for game situations. The beginning of the schedule is stupid easy, so by the time Stanford and Oregon roll around, Kelly and the 7 True Froshes will have 4-6 games under their belts and have real game experience.
Youth should never be an excuse with this team. -
Right. Like I said. Young. Just like every year for the last 20 years. A young secondary.whatshouldicareabout said:Our secondary (scholarship athletes only) right now is:
Travell Dixon (RS-SR)
Marcus Peters (RS-JR)
Brandon Beaver (RS-SO)
Kevin King (TR-SO)
Trevor Walker (TR-SO)
Jermaine Kelly (RS-FR)
Six scholarship players for the remainder of the Spring with 2 being upperclassmen (and Dixon being a JUCO transfer, so not really the same kinda upperclassman that Peters is). Clearly our biggest weakness moving into 2014, so it's nice to see that Petersen addressed depth by bringing in 7 DBs for this fall. Also worth noting that Brian Clay is a JR who transferred from Hawaii who's had a good off-season. There'll be depth when the season rolls around, which is what we need more than anything.
Point being, 8 out of 13 players will be freshman in the secondary this season. However, that youth shouldn't be an excuse for this team. We'll have talent out there and a competent DBs coach out there getting them prepared for game situations. The beginning of the schedule is stupid easy, so by the time Stanford and Oregon roll around, Kelly and the 7 True Froshes will have 4-6 games under their belts and have real game experience.
Youth should never be an excuse with this team. -
uhhhh not last year?ApostleofGrief said:
Right. Like I said. Young. Just like every year for the last 20 years. A young secondary.whatshouldicareabout said:Our secondary (scholarship athletes only) right now is:
Travell Dixon (RS-SR)
Marcus Peters (RS-JR)
Brandon Beaver (RS-SO)
Kevin King (TR-SO)
Trevor Walker (TR-SO)
Jermaine Kelly (RS-FR)
Six scholarship players for the remainder of the Spring with 2 being upperclassmen (and Dixon being a JUCO transfer, so not really the same kinda upperclassman that Peters is). Clearly our biggest weakness moving into 2014, so it's nice to see that Petersen addressed depth by bringing in 7 DBs for this fall. Also worth noting that Brian Clay is a JR who transferred from Hawaii who's had a good off-season. There'll be depth when the season rolls around, which is what we need more than anything.
Point being, 8 out of 13 players will be freshman in the secondary this season. However, that youth shouldn't be an excuse for this team. We'll have talent out there and a competent DBs coach out there getting them prepared for game situations. The beginning of the schedule is stupid easy, so by the time Stanford and Oregon roll around, Kelly and the 7 True Froshes will have 4-6 games under their belts and have real game experience.
Youth should never be an excuse with this team.
-
How can we expect to beat Eastern with such a young secondary?ApostleofGrief said:
Right. Like I said. Young. Just like every year for the last 20 years. A young secondary.whatshouldicareabout said:Our secondary (scholarship athletes only) right now is:
Travell Dixon (RS-SR)
Marcus Peters (RS-JR)
Brandon Beaver (RS-SO)
Kevin King (TR-SO)
Trevor Walker (TR-SO)
Jermaine Kelly (RS-FR)
Six scholarship players for the remainder of the Spring with 2 being upperclassmen (and Dixon being a JUCO transfer, so not really the same kinda upperclassman that Peters is). Clearly our biggest weakness moving into 2014, so it's nice to see that Petersen addressed depth by bringing in 7 DBs for this fall. Also worth noting that Brian Clay is a JR who transferred from Hawaii who's had a good off-season. There'll be depth when the season rolls around, which is what we need more than anything.
Point being, 8 out of 13 players will be freshman in the secondary this season. However, that youth shouldn't be an excuse for this team. We'll have talent out there and a competent DBs coach out there getting them prepared for game situations. The beginning of the schedule is stupid easy, so by the time Stanford and Oregon roll around, Kelly and the 7 True Froshes will have 4-6 games under their belts and have real game experience.
Youth should never be an excuse with this team. -
And no Trufant to save the day.RoadDawg55 said:
How can we expect to beat Eastern with such a young secondary?ApostleofGrief said:
Right. Like I said. Young. Just like every year for the last 20 years. A young secondary.whatshouldicareabout said:Our secondary (scholarship athletes only) right now is:
Travell Dixon (RS-SR)
Marcus Peters (RS-JR)
Brandon Beaver (RS-SO)
Kevin King (TR-SO)
Trevor Walker (TR-SO)
Jermaine Kelly (RS-FR)
Six scholarship players for the remainder of the Spring with 2 being upperclassmen (and Dixon being a JUCO transfer, so not really the same kinda upperclassman that Peters is). Clearly our biggest weakness moving into 2014, so it's nice to see that Petersen addressed depth by bringing in 7 DBs for this fall. Also worth noting that Brian Clay is a JR who transferred from Hawaii who's had a good off-season. There'll be depth when the season rolls around, which is what we need more than anything.
Point being, 8 out of 13 players will be freshman in the secondary this season. However, that youth shouldn't be an excuse for this team. We'll have talent out there and a competent DBs coach out there getting them prepared for game situations. The beginning of the schedule is stupid easy, so by the time Stanford and Oregon roll around, Kelly and the 7 True Froshes will have 4-6 games under their belts and have real game experience.
Youth should never be an excuse with this team.
-
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
uhhhh not last year?ApostleofGrief said:
Right. Like I said. Young. Just like every year for the last 20 years. A young secondary.whatshouldicareabout said:Our secondary (scholarship athletes only) right now is:
Travell Dixon (RS-SR)
Marcus Peters (RS-JR)
Brandon Beaver (RS-SO)
Kevin King (TR-SO)
Trevor Walker (TR-SO)
Jermaine Kelly (RS-FR)
Six scholarship players for the remainder of the Spring with 2 being upperclassmen (and Dixon being a JUCO transfer, so not really the same kinda upperclassman that Peters is). Clearly our biggest weakness moving into 2014, so it's nice to see that Petersen addressed depth by bringing in 7 DBs for this fall. Also worth noting that Brian Clay is a JR who transferred from Hawaii who's had a good off-season. There'll be depth when the season rolls around, which is what we need more than anything.
Point being, 8 out of 13 players will be freshman in the secondary this season. However, that youth shouldn't be an excuse for this team. We'll have talent out there and a competent DBs coach out there getting them prepared for game situations. The beginning of the schedule is stupid easy, so by the time Stanford and Oregon roll around, Kelly and the 7 True Froshes will have 4-6 games under their belts and have real game experience.
Youth should never be an excuse with this team.
whoooooooooooooooooosh
-
if eastern fumbles a lot, like the last gameRoadDawg55 said:
How can we expect to beat Eastern with such a young secondary?ApostleofGrief said:
Right. Like I said. Young. Just like every year for the last 20 years. A young secondary.whatshouldicareabout said:Our secondary (scholarship athletes only) right now is:
Travell Dixon (RS-SR)
Marcus Peters (RS-JR)
Brandon Beaver (RS-SO)
Kevin King (TR-SO)
Trevor Walker (TR-SO)
Jermaine Kelly (RS-FR)
Six scholarship players for the remainder of the Spring with 2 being upperclassmen (and Dixon being a JUCO transfer, so not really the same kinda upperclassman that Peters is). Clearly our biggest weakness moving into 2014, so it's nice to see that Petersen addressed depth by bringing in 7 DBs for this fall. Also worth noting that Brian Clay is a JR who transferred from Hawaii who's had a good off-season. There'll be depth when the season rolls around, which is what we need more than anything.
Point being, 8 out of 13 players will be freshman in the secondary this season. However, that youth shouldn't be an excuse for this team. We'll have talent out there and a competent DBs coach out there getting them prepared for game situations. The beginning of the schedule is stupid easy, so by the time Stanford and Oregon roll around, Kelly and the 7 True Froshes will have 4-6 games under their belts and have real game experience.
Youth should never be an excuse with this team. -
I'm not blaming Peete for the secondary problem, but watch it.... the media can act as an excuse proxy for the coach. AND -- these new DB recruits... how many will last? The secondary is young excuse is almost always used (yes, last year was a slight improvement but it is a steady fall back).
-
Be cool if you had a guy in your secondary named Young. Sark would approve.
-
dflea said:
Propaganda is what Sark was feeding you while you were busy polishing his sack, and the Huskies were blowing an 18 point lead against the fucking Coogers.ApostleofGrief said:
propagandadflea said:Sark peddled excuses. Petersen won't. He'll just have someone else ready to play.
The days of bullshit football are over at Washington.
A .876 winning percentage - in any conference - isn't propaganda, dumbass. It's a record that speaks for itself. If you don't hear it, it's because your head is in your ass.
welcome back. -
It never should have been an excuse. Doog morons have been using since 2003. There are usually some weak spots, even on great teams (Seahawk's o line and wide receivers come to mind).whatshouldicareabout said:Our secondary (scholarship athletes only) right now is:
Travell Dixon (RS-SR)
Marcus Peters (RS-JR)
Brandon Beaver (RS-SO)
Kevin King (TR-SO)
Trevor Walker (TR-SO)
Jermaine Kelly (RS-FR)
Six scholarship players for the remainder of the Spring with 2 being upperclassmen (and Dixon being a JUCO transfer, so not really the same kinda upperclassman that Peters is). Clearly our biggest weakness moving into 2014, so it's nice to see that Petersen addressed depth by bringing in 7 DBs for this fall. Also worth noting that Brian Clay is a JR who transferred from Hawaii who's had a good off-season. There'll be depth when the season rolls around, which is what we need more than anything.
Point being, 8 out of 13 players will be freshman in the secondary this season. However, that youth shouldn't be an excuse for this team. We'll have talent out there and a competent DBs coach out there getting them prepared for game situations. The beginning of the schedule is stupid easy, so by the time Stanford and Oregon roll around, Kelly and the 7 True Froshes will have 4-6 games under their belts and have real game experience.
Youth should never be an excuse with this team. -
The youth excuse actually started in 2000 by Ted Miller who was describing our skill guys.
UW was still the favorites and expected to win conference in spite of youth.
Youth became a crutch during the Ty years which is funny because in 2006 and 2007 we had 20+ fifth year seniors.
As always Doogs ignored the facts on Ty as Doogs hate facts.
Just like they always said Sark had a young team in 2010 because he played 16 true freshman. I used to always tell them that number is so high because Sark is a dumb fuck. Look at the contributors on that 2010 team they were all upperclassman or in the case of Chris Polk a redshirt sophomore. -
I remember the secondary was thin even back in the last couple of Lambo years. The secondary is ALWAYS YOUNG, with the possible exception of last season, where there was a slight improvement.He_Needs_More_Time said:The youth excuse actually started in 2000 by Ted Miller who was describing our skill guys.
UW was still the favorites and expected to win conference in spite of youth.
Youth became a crutch during the Ty years which is funny because in 2006 and 2007 we had 20+ fifth year seniors.
As always Doogs ignored the facts on Ty as Doogs hate facts.
Just like they always said Sark had a young team in 2010 because he played 16 true freshman. I used to always tell them that number is so high because Sark is a dumb fuck. Look at the contributors on that 2010 team they were all upperclassman or in the case of Chris Polk a redshirt sophomore.
-
I'm not debating any of that just telling the story of when "We are young" was official which was 2000 by Ted Miller. Became a crutch under Ty even though we actually weren't young.ApostleofGrief said:
I remember the secondary was thin even back in the last couple of Lambo years. The secondary is ALWAYS YOUNG, with the possible exception of last season, where there was a slight improvement.He_Needs_More_Time said:The youth excuse actually started in 2000 by Ted Miller who was describing our skill guys.
UW was still the favorites and expected to win conference in spite of youth.
Youth became a crutch during the Ty years which is funny because in 2006 and 2007 we had 20+ fifth year seniors.
As always Doogs ignored the facts on Ty as Doogs hate facts.
Just like they always said Sark had a young team in 2010 because he played 16 true freshman. I used to always tell them that number is so high because Sark is a dumb fuck. Look at the contributors on that 2010 team they were all upperclassman or in the case of Chris Polk a redshirt sophomore. -
Unless there are two srs. and 17 freshmen starting or receiving significant playing time it's always bullshit. I remember pointing out to people on Dawgman that LSU and Oregon had more young players and we did. The more I think about Kim's lies and propaganda and their minion's stupidity, the more I shake my head.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I'm not debating any of that just telling the story of when "We are young" was official which was 2000 by Ted Miller. Became a crutch under Ty even though we actually weren't young.ApostleofGrief said:
I remember the secondary was thin even back in the last couple of Lambo years. The secondary is ALWAYS YOUNG, with the possible exception of last season, where there was a slight improvement.He_Needs_More_Time said:The youth excuse actually started in 2000 by Ted Miller who was describing our skill guys.
UW was still the favorites and expected to win conference in spite of youth.
Youth became a crutch during the Ty years which is funny because in 2006 and 2007 we had 20+ fifth year seniors.
As always Doogs ignored the facts on Ty as Doogs hate facts.
Just like they always said Sark had a young team in 2010 because he played 16 true freshman. I used to always tell them that number is so high because Sark is a dumb fuck. Look at the contributors on that 2010 team they were all upperclassman or in the case of Chris Polk a redshirt sophomore. -
i just found myself watching the husky softball game for a second (damn theres some fat asses on that field)
anyways, some husky girl jacked a 2 run homer and, well, the whole team was waiting at home plate doing the lawnmower as she rounded the bases. lol -
and barking i should add
-
brb jo to Amazonsphineas said:i just found myself watching the husky softball game for a second (damn theres some fat asses on that field)
anyways, some husky girl jacked a 2 run homer and, well, the whole team was waiting at home plate doing the lawnmower as she rounded the bases. lol -
Oh I used to always point that out how Oregon is actually younger than us back in 2010-2012. Sark like Ty actually had some experienced teams in his second and third year. Much more experienced teams than Petersen will have in year two.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Unless there are two srs. and 17 freshmen starting or receiving significant playing time it's always bullshit. I remember pointing out to people on Dawgman that LSU and Oregon had more young players and we did. The more I think about Kim's lies and propaganda and their minion's stupidity, the more I shake my head.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I'm not debating any of that just telling the story of when "We are young" was official which was 2000 by Ted Miller. Became a crutch under Ty even though we actually weren't young.ApostleofGrief said:
I remember the secondary was thin even back in the last couple of Lambo years. The secondary is ALWAYS YOUNG, with the possible exception of last season, where there was a slight improvement.He_Needs_More_Time said:The youth excuse actually started in 2000 by Ted Miller who was describing our skill guys.
UW was still the favorites and expected to win conference in spite of youth.
Youth became a crutch during the Ty years which is funny because in 2006 and 2007 we had 20+ fifth year seniors.
As always Doogs ignored the facts on Ty as Doogs hate facts.
Just like they always said Sark had a young team in 2010 because he played 16 true freshman. I used to always tell them that number is so high because Sark is a dumb fuck. Look at the contributors on that 2010 team they were all upperclassman or in the case of Chris Polk a redshirt sophomore. -
Great talent become starters as Freshmen. If they don't, they either weren't as talented as the lemonparty TBS "experts" thought they were or, they are stuck behind NFL talent at their position.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Oh I used to always point that out how Oregon is actually younger than us back in 2010-2012. Sark like Ty actually had some experienced teams in his second and third year. Much more experienced teams than Petersen will have in year two.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Unless there are two srs. and 17 freshmen starting or receiving significant playing time it's always bullshit. I remember pointing out to people on Dawgman that LSU and Oregon had more young players and we did. The more I think about Kim's lies and propaganda and their minion's stupidity, the more I shake my head.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I'm not debating any of that just telling the story of when "We are young" was official which was 2000 by Ted Miller. Became a crutch under Ty even though we actually weren't young.ApostleofGrief said:
I remember the secondary was thin even back in the last couple of Lambo years. The secondary is ALWAYS YOUNG, with the possible exception of last season, where there was a slight improvement.He_Needs_More_Time said:The youth excuse actually started in 2000 by Ted Miller who was describing our skill guys.
UW was still the favorites and expected to win conference in spite of youth.
Youth became a crutch during the Ty years which is funny because in 2006 and 2007 we had 20+ fifth year seniors.
As always Doogs ignored the facts on Ty as Doogs hate facts.
Just like they always said Sark had a young team in 2010 because he played 16 true freshman. I used to always tell them that number is so high because Sark is a dumb fuck. Look at the contributors on that 2010 team they were all upperclassman or in the case of Chris Polk a redshirt sophomore.
-
Girls can do lawnmower dance...that's fine. Hell, softball has all those kooky chants/dances/rituals anyways.phineas said:
i just found myself watching the husky softball game for a second (damn theres some fat asses on that field)
anyways, some husky girl jacked a 2 run homer and, well, the whole team was waiting at home plate doing the lawnmower as she rounded the bases. lol -
That shit defines girls sports.HuskyJW said:Girls can do lawnmower dance...that's fine. Hell, softball has all those kooky chants/dances/rituals anyways.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-f_DPrSEOEo
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
