Roll out "secondary is young this year excuse" again.... and again.... and again...
Comments
-
I remember the secondary was thin even back in the last couple of Lambo years. The secondary is ALWAYS YOUNG, with the possible exception of last season, where there was a slight improvement.He_Needs_More_Time said:The youth excuse actually started in 2000 by Ted Miller who was describing our skill guys.
UW was still the favorites and expected to win conference in spite of youth.
Youth became a crutch during the Ty years which is funny because in 2006 and 2007 we had 20+ fifth year seniors.
As always Doogs ignored the facts on Ty as Doogs hate facts.
Just like they always said Sark had a young team in 2010 because he played 16 true freshman. I used to always tell them that number is so high because Sark is a dumb fuck. Look at the contributors on that 2010 team they were all upperclassman or in the case of Chris Polk a redshirt sophomore.
-
I'm not debating any of that just telling the story of when "We are young" was official which was 2000 by Ted Miller. Became a crutch under Ty even though we actually weren't young.ApostleofGrief said:
I remember the secondary was thin even back in the last couple of Lambo years. The secondary is ALWAYS YOUNG, with the possible exception of last season, where there was a slight improvement.He_Needs_More_Time said:The youth excuse actually started in 2000 by Ted Miller who was describing our skill guys.
UW was still the favorites and expected to win conference in spite of youth.
Youth became a crutch during the Ty years which is funny because in 2006 and 2007 we had 20+ fifth year seniors.
As always Doogs ignored the facts on Ty as Doogs hate facts.
Just like they always said Sark had a young team in 2010 because he played 16 true freshman. I used to always tell them that number is so high because Sark is a dumb fuck. Look at the contributors on that 2010 team they were all upperclassman or in the case of Chris Polk a redshirt sophomore. -
Unless there are two srs. and 17 freshmen starting or receiving significant playing time it's always bullshit. I remember pointing out to people on Dawgman that LSU and Oregon had more young players and we did. The more I think about Kim's lies and propaganda and their minion's stupidity, the more I shake my head.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I'm not debating any of that just telling the story of when "We are young" was official which was 2000 by Ted Miller. Became a crutch under Ty even though we actually weren't young.ApostleofGrief said:
I remember the secondary was thin even back in the last couple of Lambo years. The secondary is ALWAYS YOUNG, with the possible exception of last season, where there was a slight improvement.He_Needs_More_Time said:The youth excuse actually started in 2000 by Ted Miller who was describing our skill guys.
UW was still the favorites and expected to win conference in spite of youth.
Youth became a crutch during the Ty years which is funny because in 2006 and 2007 we had 20+ fifth year seniors.
As always Doogs ignored the facts on Ty as Doogs hate facts.
Just like they always said Sark had a young team in 2010 because he played 16 true freshman. I used to always tell them that number is so high because Sark is a dumb fuck. Look at the contributors on that 2010 team they were all upperclassman or in the case of Chris Polk a redshirt sophomore. -
i just found myself watching the husky softball game for a second (damn theres some fat asses on that field)
anyways, some husky girl jacked a 2 run homer and, well, the whole team was waiting at home plate doing the lawnmower as she rounded the bases. lol -
and barking i should add
-
brb jo to Amazonsphineas said:i just found myself watching the husky softball game for a second (damn theres some fat asses on that field)
anyways, some husky girl jacked a 2 run homer and, well, the whole team was waiting at home plate doing the lawnmower as she rounded the bases. lol -
Oh I used to always point that out how Oregon is actually younger than us back in 2010-2012. Sark like Ty actually had some experienced teams in his second and third year. Much more experienced teams than Petersen will have in year two.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Unless there are two srs. and 17 freshmen starting or receiving significant playing time it's always bullshit. I remember pointing out to people on Dawgman that LSU and Oregon had more young players and we did. The more I think about Kim's lies and propaganda and their minion's stupidity, the more I shake my head.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I'm not debating any of that just telling the story of when "We are young" was official which was 2000 by Ted Miller. Became a crutch under Ty even though we actually weren't young.ApostleofGrief said:
I remember the secondary was thin even back in the last couple of Lambo years. The secondary is ALWAYS YOUNG, with the possible exception of last season, where there was a slight improvement.He_Needs_More_Time said:The youth excuse actually started in 2000 by Ted Miller who was describing our skill guys.
UW was still the favorites and expected to win conference in spite of youth.
Youth became a crutch during the Ty years which is funny because in 2006 and 2007 we had 20+ fifth year seniors.
As always Doogs ignored the facts on Ty as Doogs hate facts.
Just like they always said Sark had a young team in 2010 because he played 16 true freshman. I used to always tell them that number is so high because Sark is a dumb fuck. Look at the contributors on that 2010 team they were all upperclassman or in the case of Chris Polk a redshirt sophomore. -
Great talent become starters as Freshmen. If they don't, they either weren't as talented as the lemonparty TBS "experts" thought they were or, they are stuck behind NFL talent at their position.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Oh I used to always point that out how Oregon is actually younger than us back in 2010-2012. Sark like Ty actually had some experienced teams in his second and third year. Much more experienced teams than Petersen will have in year two.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Unless there are two srs. and 17 freshmen starting or receiving significant playing time it's always bullshit. I remember pointing out to people on Dawgman that LSU and Oregon had more young players and we did. The more I think about Kim's lies and propaganda and their minion's stupidity, the more I shake my head.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I'm not debating any of that just telling the story of when "We are young" was official which was 2000 by Ted Miller. Became a crutch under Ty even though we actually weren't young.ApostleofGrief said:
I remember the secondary was thin even back in the last couple of Lambo years. The secondary is ALWAYS YOUNG, with the possible exception of last season, where there was a slight improvement.He_Needs_More_Time said:The youth excuse actually started in 2000 by Ted Miller who was describing our skill guys.
UW was still the favorites and expected to win conference in spite of youth.
Youth became a crutch during the Ty years which is funny because in 2006 and 2007 we had 20+ fifth year seniors.
As always Doogs ignored the facts on Ty as Doogs hate facts.
Just like they always said Sark had a young team in 2010 because he played 16 true freshman. I used to always tell them that number is so high because Sark is a dumb fuck. Look at the contributors on that 2010 team they were all upperclassman or in the case of Chris Polk a redshirt sophomore.
-
Girls can do lawnmower dance...that's fine. Hell, softball has all those kooky chants/dances/rituals anyways.phineas said:
i just found myself watching the husky softball game for a second (damn theres some fat asses on that field)
anyways, some husky girl jacked a 2 run homer and, well, the whole team was waiting at home plate doing the lawnmower as she rounded the bases. lol -
That shit defines girls sports.HuskyJW said:Girls can do lawnmower dance...that's fine. Hell, softball has all those kooky chants/dances/rituals anyways.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
