Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Independent contractors

2»

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963

    HHusky said:

    Your objection to the three part test for independent contractor status is what? It looks pretty familiar, not novel or new, to those of us who have been involved in commercial law and litigation for more than 30 years.

    Notably absent: "Employment Law."

    Fucking Collection Agency Lawyer, at best.
    Take your time. You'll think of something relevant to say . . . conceivably.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Your objection to the three part test for independent contractor status is what? It looks pretty familiar, not novel or new, to those of us who have been involved in commercial law and litigation for more than 30 years.

    Notably absent: "Employment Law."

    Fucking Collection Agency Lawyer, at best.
    Take your time. You'll think of something relevant to say . . . conceivably.
    What would you know about relevance, flunky?

    That's a legal term. Way beyond your pay-grade.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,963

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Your objection to the three part test for independent contractor status is what? It looks pretty familiar, not novel or new, to those of us who have been involved in commercial law and litigation for more than 30 years.

    Notably absent: "Employment Law."

    Fucking Collection Agency Lawyer, at best.
    Take your time. You'll think of something relevant to say . . . conceivably.
    What would you know about relevance, flunky?

    That's a legal term. Way beyond your pay-grade.
    So too soon, apparently.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,616 Standard Supporter
    So, chief counsel for Uber wanders into the great commercial law and litigator, the Counselor to ask for some legal advice on the new legislation. The Counselor goes full Slo Jo Biden and starts rambling about how great this is for dog walkers let alone Uber independent contractors who don't want to be employees. Next he tells his "client" that Daddy has created so many great jobs who could argue with this attempt to damage Uber's business and their independent drivers. Hilarity ensues. When I say I pity his clients, this is the sharp legal and economic analysis that HH has displayed for years.