Senate impeachment trial game thread
Comments
-
Yeah, but where? Kind of important.GrundleStiltzkin said:
-
It's not lost on me to see the cunt in tennis shoes on the other side of the podium.RaceBannon said: -
They got their monies worth in the house to stay this fake Bullshit. That's where population counts. HTHGrundleStiltzkin said: -
-
Or natural causes like ScaliaPurpleThrobber said:
Roberts didn’t want to end up killing himself like Epstein.DerekJohnson said:
I've said this before. Two decades from now, historians will write about how the Dems blackmailed Roberts to make him their pool boyRaceBannon said:Roberts is running cover again
Rand Paul is going after him on the whistleblower -
PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:
Or natural causes like ScaliaPurpleThrobber said:
Roberts didn’t want to end up killing himself like Epstein.DerekJohnson said:
I've said this before. Two decades from now, historians will write about how the Dems blackmailed Roberts to make him their pool boyRaceBannon said:Roberts is running cover again
Rand Paul is going after him on the whistleblower
Or RBG.
-
-
If you ignore the fact that the House didn't have years to litigate whether the President will cheat in an election that is nine months away and that she calls for Democrats to fight a limited war in the face of Trumpism--which Murkowski's party owns, it is otherwise reasonably good. Too high brow for "the People" though, like Mueller was.
-
You're saying the House needs more tim to get its own guys in there? Kickoff Party for Impeachment:The Sequel - Jan. 20, 2021.HHusky said:If you ignore the fact that the House didn't have years to litigate whether the President will cheat in an election that is nine months away and that she calls for Democrats to fight a limited war in the face of Trumpism--which Murkowski's party owns, it is otherwise reasonably good. Too high brow for "the People" though, like Mueller was.
And still crickets on those 'high crimes', eh, dazzler?
-
Your question is still reflective of your ignorance. On the bright side, you and Alan Dershowitz appear to be soul mates.PurpleThrobber said:
You're saying the House needs more tim to get its own guys in there? Kickoff Party for Impeachment:The Sequel - Jan. 20, 2021.HHusky said:If you ignore the fact that the House didn't have years to litigate whether the President will cheat in an election that is nine months away and that she calls for Democrats to fight a limited war in the face of Trumpism--which Murkowski's party owns, it is otherwise reasonably good. Too high brow for "the People" though, like Mueller was.
And still crickets on those 'high crimes', eh, dazzler?
https://www.troyrecord.com/news/local-news/jonah-goldberg-dershowitz-s-dangerous-defense-of-trump/article_c07ca0e6-462c-11ea-bba0-53c6a87e7a5e.html -
I want YOUR own words. Not some google search. C"mon, dazzler. Your time to SHINE!!!! Build the case on why Part II is gonna be any different that Version 1.0 *crickets* High CRIMES!!!HHusky said:
Your question is still reflective of your ignorance. On the bright side, you and Alan Dershowitz appear to be soul mates.PurpleThrobber said:
You're saying the House needs more tim to get its own guys in there? Kickoff Party for Impeachment:The Sequel - Jan. 20, 2021.HHusky said:If you ignore the fact that the House didn't have years to litigate whether the President will cheat in an election that is nine months away and that she calls for Democrats to fight a limited war in the face of Trumpism--which Murkowski's party owns, it is otherwise reasonably good. Too high brow for "the People" though, like Mueller was.
And still crickets on those 'high crimes', eh, dazzler?
https://www.troyrecord.com/news/local-news/jonah-goldberg-dershowitz-s-dangerous-defense-of-trump/article_c07ca0e6-462c-11ea-bba0-53c6a87e7a5e.html
-
Someone can read it to you. Many TugCons are semi-literate.PurpleThrobber said:
I want YOUR own words. Not some google search. C"mon, dazzler. Your time to SHINE!!!! Build the case on why Part II is gonna be any different that Version 1.0 *crickets* High CRIMES!!!HHusky said:
Your question is still reflective of your ignorance. On the bright side, you and Alan Dershowitz appear to be soul mates.PurpleThrobber said:
You're saying the House needs more tim to get its own guys in there? Kickoff Party for Impeachment:The Sequel - Jan. 20, 2021.HHusky said:If you ignore the fact that the House didn't have years to litigate whether the President will cheat in an election that is nine months away and that she calls for Democrats to fight a limited war in the face of Trumpism--which Murkowski's party owns, it is otherwise reasonably good. Too high brow for "the People" though, like Mueller was.
And still crickets on those 'high crimes', eh, dazzler?
https://www.troyrecord.com/news/local-news/jonah-goldberg-dershowitz-s-dangerous-defense-of-trump/article_c07ca0e6-462c-11ea-bba0-53c6a87e7a5e.html -
Nice curtain she's wearing.GrundleStiltzkin said: -
YOUR words, dazzler. Not Jonah Goldberg.HHusky said:
Someone can read it to you. Many TugCons are semi-literate.PurpleThrobber said:
I want YOUR own words. Not some google search. C"mon, dazzler. Your time to SHINE!!!! Build the case on why Part II is gonna be any different that Version 1.0 *crickets* High CRIMES!!!HHusky said:
Your question is still reflective of your ignorance. On the bright side, you and Alan Dershowitz appear to be soul mates.PurpleThrobber said:
You're saying the House needs more tim to get its own guys in there? Kickoff Party for Impeachment:The Sequel - Jan. 20, 2021.HHusky said:If you ignore the fact that the House didn't have years to litigate whether the President will cheat in an election that is nine months away and that she calls for Democrats to fight a limited war in the face of Trumpism--which Murkowski's party owns, it is otherwise reasonably good. Too high brow for "the People" though, like Mueller was.
And still crickets on those 'high crimes', eh, dazzler?
https://www.troyrecord.com/news/local-news/jonah-goldberg-dershowitz-s-dangerous-defense-of-trump/article_c07ca0e6-462c-11ea-bba0-53c6a87e7a5e.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah_Goldberg
Or maybe you are Jonah Goldberg whose bio shows absolutely no legal education or practice. In which case, you have misrepresented your legal credentials.
-
You caught me!PurpleThrobber said:
YOUR words, dazzler. Not Jonah Goldberg.HHusky said:
Someone can read it to you. Many TugCons are semi-literate.PurpleThrobber said:
I want YOUR own words. Not some google search. C"mon, dazzler. Your time to SHINE!!!! Build the case on why Part II is gonna be any different that Version 1.0 *crickets* High CRIMES!!!HHusky said:
Your question is still reflective of your ignorance. On the bright side, you and Alan Dershowitz appear to be soul mates.PurpleThrobber said:
You're saying the House needs more tim to get its own guys in there? Kickoff Party for Impeachment:The Sequel - Jan. 20, 2021.HHusky said:If you ignore the fact that the House didn't have years to litigate whether the President will cheat in an election that is nine months away and that she calls for Democrats to fight a limited war in the face of Trumpism--which Murkowski's party owns, it is otherwise reasonably good. Too high brow for "the People" though, like Mueller was.
And still crickets on those 'high crimes', eh, dazzler?
https://www.troyrecord.com/news/local-news/jonah-goldberg-dershowitz-s-dangerous-defense-of-trump/article_c07ca0e6-462c-11ea-bba0-53c6a87e7a5e.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah_Goldberg
Or maybe you are Jonah Goldberg whose bio shows absolutely no legal education or practice. In which case, you have misrepresented your legal credentials.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFf3oGI0KGw
