Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Senate impeachment trial game thread

11719212223

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,321
    Dude61 said:

    John Roberts does nothing while the FISA court which he personally oversees illegally spied on an American citizen. He did nothing when DOJ determined the court was defrauded. But when a senator asked a question, Roberts shuts that down. Twice. What a fucking coward.

    This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    John Roberts does nothing while the FISA court which he personally oversees illegally spied on an American citizen. He did nothing when DOJ determined the court was defrauded. But when a senator asked a question, Roberts shuts that down. Twice. What a fucking coward.

    This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.
    I don't recall anyone opposing Judicial activism when directed at rooting our fraud and corruption on the Courts my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. Can you direct me to the Conservative policy/belief that opposes the Chief Justice looking into fraud and corruption in the Judicial Branch on account of their opposition to judicial activism?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,321
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    John Roberts does nothing while the FISA court which he personally oversees illegally spied on an American citizen. He did nothing when DOJ determined the court was defrauded. But when a senator asked a question, Roberts shuts that down. Twice. What a fucking coward.

    This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.
    I don't recall anyone opposing Judicial activism when directed at rooting our fraud and corruption on the Courts my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. Can you direct me to the Conservative policy/belief that opposes the Chief Justice looking into fraud and corruption in the Judicial Branch on account of their opposition to judicial activism?
    So TugCons thinks the Supreme Court should very publicly take on a case not presented to them. Yes, you cannot make this stuff up.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    John Roberts does nothing while the FISA court which he personally oversees illegally spied on an American citizen. He did nothing when DOJ determined the court was defrauded. But when a senator asked a question, Roberts shuts that down. Twice. What a fucking coward.

    This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.
    I don't recall anyone opposing Judicial activism when directed at rooting our fraud and corruption on the Courts my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. Can you direct me to the Conservative policy/belief that opposes the Chief Justice looking into fraud and corruption in the Judicial Branch on account of their opposition to judicial activism?
    So TugCons thinks the Supreme Court should very publicly take on a case not presented to them. Yes, you cannot make this stuff up.
    Who said anything about a case my lying Kunt of a friend?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,321
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Dude61 said:

    John Roberts does nothing while the FISA court which he personally oversees illegally spied on an American citizen. He did nothing when DOJ determined the court was defrauded. But when a senator asked a question, Roberts shuts that down. Twice. What a fucking coward.

    This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.
    I don't recall anyone opposing Judicial activism when directed at rooting our fraud and corruption on the Courts my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. Can you direct me to the Conservative policy/belief that opposes the Chief Justice looking into fraud and corruption in the Judicial Branch on account of their opposition to judicial activism?
    So TugCons thinks the Supreme Court should very publicly take on a case not presented to them. Yes, you cannot make this stuff up.
    Who said anything about a case my lying Kunt of a friend?
    Whooooooosh!
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,413 Founders Club
    HHusky said:
    » show previous quotes
    This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.


    You also can't make up the fact that Roberts is presiding over the Senate trial and as such makes rulings that allegedly are non partisan yet he's been a partisan hack since W nominated him

    W the real conservative

    Why is Roberts protecting Schiff and the whistleblower?

    He can be impeached too
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,486 Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:
    » show previous quotes
    This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.


    You also can't make up the fact that Roberts is presiding over the Senate trial and as such makes rulings that allegedly are non partisan yet he's been a partisan hack since W nominated him

    W the real conservative

    Why is Roberts protecting Schiff and the whistleblower?

    He can be impeached too

    Perhaps, like in the last two episodes of Ray Donovan, the judge is in on it too. Until he jumps out the window and gets whacked in the woods.

    Honest to god, this whole thing is episodic TV. Is Aaron Sorkin the screenwriter for this whole shit show?

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,413 Founders Club

    HHusky said:
    » show previous quotes
    This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.


    You also can't make up the fact that Roberts is presiding over the Senate trial and as such makes rulings that allegedly are non partisan yet he's been a partisan hack since W nominated him

    W the real conservative

    Why is Roberts protecting Schiff and the whistleblower?

    He can be impeached too

    Perhaps, like in the last two episodes of Ray Donovan, the judge is in on it too. Until he jumps out the window and gets whacked in the woods.

    Honest to god, this whole thing is episodic TV. Is Aaron Sorkin the screenwriter for this whole shit show?

    Roberts is a never Trumper like the rest o the Bush clan. He is clearly part of the problem and not impartial.