Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Senate impeachment trial game thread
Comments
-
-
Schiff is a truly pathetic faggot
-
Trump’s legal team is on the floor methodically shredding the impeachment case. Turns out, things aren’t so slam dunk for House Democrats when the President gets a chance to respond.
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) January 25, 2020
Imagine that. -
And the crickets are chirping louder.
-
-
-
In the Courts, the DA needs to be convinced that there is a case against a defendant that will result in a conviction by evidence presented to the jury before prosecution begins. In what Kangaroo court would a DA make a decision to prosecute this case?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset -
No crime. Constitution says high crimes and misdemeanors. Treason etc. No crime has been alleged. None. Just vague bullshit. Nothing prosecutable. Time to and the sham. We'll hear all the lefties testify at their criminal trials when Durham files.
-
I'm hearing that despite Hillary breaking the law with her emails no DA would bring chargessalemcoog said:
In the Courts, the DA needs to be convinced that there is a case against a defendant that will result in a conviction by evidence presented to the jury before prosecution begins. In what Kangaroo court would a DA make a decision to prosecute this case?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset -
I'm tired of hearing about her damn emails!RaceBannon said:
I'm hearing that despite Hillary breaking the law with her emails no DA would bring chargessalemcoog said:
In the Courts, the DA needs to be convinced that there is a case against a defendant that will result in a conviction by evidence presented to the jury before prosecution begins. In what Kangaroo court would a DA make a decision to prosecute this case?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
