Breaking Murkowski comes out against impeachment witnesses, putting Trump on path to acquittal

Comments

• RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,148

  January 2020

  #WINNING

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HHusky Member Posts: 23,627

  January 2020

  Still work to do, ladies.
  
  You'll need to smear your former hero, John Bolton.

  -6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117

  January 2020

  Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.

  -7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,738

  January 2020

  
  

  11 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117

  January 2020

  75% of Americans want witnesses in the trial. Why is the GOP afraid of?
  
  https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/480336-support-for-witnesses-in-senate-trial-at-75-percent-poll

  -3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 17,909

  January 2020

  insinceredawg said:

  Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.

  Imagine still believing this is anything but a partisan exercise by the Dems.

  10 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,148

  January 2020

  insinceredawg said:

  75% of Americans want witnesses in the trial. Why is the GOP afraid of?
  
  https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/480336-support-for-witnesses-in-senate-trial-at-75-percent-poll

  They wanted them in house proceedings too
  
  What happened there?
  
  Is this what you coogs will be crying about forever?
  
  
  

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• GDS Member Posts: 1,470

  January 2020

  You gotta love Murkowski's argument. She admits there is no way the GOP will give the President's wrongdoing a fair trial so fuck it, why bother calling witnesses. At least she's honest that there is no act the President could undertake at this point that the GOP won't coverup for him.

  -1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HHusky Member Posts: 23,627

  January 2020

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  show previous quotes

  insinceredawg said:

  Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.

  Imagine still believing this is anything but a partisan exercise by the Dems.

  So we can't find out the details of Daddy's abuses until we determine that everyone asking for the truth has only pure motives. (The Constitution as "living, breathing document", I guess.)

  -4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,107

  January 2020

  insinceredawg said:

  Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.

  That was the House's responsibility retard.
  
  Great goalpost moving as always

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HHusky Member Posts: 23,627

  January 2020

  PostGameOrangeSlices said:

  show previous quotes

  insinceredawg said:

  Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.

  That was the House's responsibility retard.
  
  Great goalpost moving as always

  Imagine requiring the President to comply with lawful process! Crazy talk!

  -7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 17,909

  January 2020

  HHusky said:

  show previous quotes

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  insinceredawg said:

  Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.

  Imagine still believing this is anything but a partisan exercise by the Dems.

  So we can't find out the details of Daddy's abuses until we determine that everyone asking for the truth has only pure motives. (The Constitution as "living, breathing document", I guess.)

  Imagine thinking you had the evidence for impeachment in the first place without actually having any evidence.

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,107

  January 2020 edited January 2020

  HHusky said:

  show previous quotes

  PostGameOrangeSlices said:

  insinceredawg said:

  Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.

  That was the House's responsibility retard.
  
  Great goalpost moving as always

  Imagine requiring the President to comply with lawful process! Crazy talk!

  Imagine you saying anything of substance?
  
  Yeah, I cant imagine it either
  
  Fucking idiot

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HHusky Member Posts: 23,627

  January 2020

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  show previous quotes

  HHusky said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  insinceredawg said:

  Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.

  Imagine still believing this is anything but a partisan exercise by the Dems.

  So we can't find out the details of Daddy's abuses until we determine that everyone asking for the truth has only pure motives. (The Constitution as "living, breathing document", I guess.)

  Imagine thinking you had the evidence for impeachment in the first place without actually having any evidence.

  Yes, the emperor's clothes are very impressive!

  -1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,148

  January 2020

  H isn't melting down
  
  At all

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 17,909

  January 2020

  HHusky said:

  show previous quotes

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  HHusky said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  insinceredawg said:

  Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.

  Imagine still believing this is anything but a partisan exercise by the Dems.

  So we can't find out the details of Daddy's abuses until we determine that everyone asking for the truth has only pure motives. (The Constitution as "living, breathing document", I guess.)

  Imagine thinking you had the evidence for impeachment in the first place without actually having any evidence.

  Yes, the emperor's clothes are very impressive!

  Someone's mad today. It seems like they probably should have had a fairly airtight case before leaving the House. I mean, that's what they did with Nixon. Why the need for new witnesses in the Senate?

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HHusky Member Posts: 23,627

  January 2020

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  show previous quotes

  HHusky said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  HHusky said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  insinceredawg said:

  Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.

  Imagine still believing this is anything but a partisan exercise by the Dems.

  So we can't find out the details of Daddy's abuses until we determine that everyone asking for the truth has only pure motives. (The Constitution as "living, breathing document", I guess.)

  Imagine thinking you had the evidence for impeachment in the first place without actually having any evidence.

  Yes, the emperor's clothes are very impressive!

  Someone's mad today. It seems like they probably should have had a fairly airtight case before leaving the House. I mean, that's what they did with Nixon. Why the need for new witnesses in the Senate?

  There was already plenty of evidence of the President's guilt. Hell. Much of it played out in public.
  
  It's okay though. It's probably better for his opponents that the facts roll out like a hand of cards. In a few months or years, you'll all be "adjusting" your positions on this and it will be impossible to find anyone who will admit to defending Daddy.
  

  -7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 17,909

  January 2020

  HHusky said:

  show previous quotes

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  HHusky said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  HHusky said:

  UW_Doog_Bot said:

  insinceredawg said:

  Imagine having a trial and not allowing any witnesses then getting mad when accused of a cover up.

  Imagine still believing this is anything but a partisan exercise by the Dems.

  So we can't find out the details of Daddy's abuses until we determine that everyone asking for the truth has only pure motives. (The Constitution as "living, breathing document", I guess.)

  Imagine thinking you had the evidence for impeachment in the first place without actually having any evidence.

  Yes, the emperor's clothes are very impressive!

  Someone's mad today. It seems like they probably should have had a fairly airtight case before leaving the House. I mean, that's what they did with Nixon. Why the need for new witnesses in the Senate?

  There was already plenty of evidence of the President's guilt. Hell. Much of it played out in public.
  
  It's okay though. It's probably better for his opponents that the facts roll out like a hand of cards. In a few months or years, you'll all be "adjusting" your positions on this and it will be impossible to find anyone who will admit to defending Daddy.
  

  Evidence of what exactly? Do spell it out for us. Quid Pro Quo? oh, wait, no, "abuse of power".

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,648

  January 2020

  I was told the case was rock solid
  
  Back when they were all congratulating each other

  8 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,148

  January 2020

  What is Bolton going to add anyway? Another third hand account of the big lie. The aid got sent. There was no investigation
  
  Game over
  
  Now, Biden isn't above the law. No one is. Time to investigate

  8 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter