Senate impeachment trial game thread
Comments
-
John Roberts does nothing while the FISA court which he personally oversees illegally spied on an American citizen. He did nothing when DOJ determined the court was defrauded. But when a senator asked a question, Roberts shuts that down. Twice. What a fucking coward.
-
This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.Dude61 said:John Roberts does nothing while the FISA court which he personally oversees illegally spied on an American citizen. He did nothing when DOJ determined the court was defrauded. But when a senator asked a question, Roberts shuts that down. Twice. What a fucking coward.
-
I don't recall anyone opposing Judicial activism when directed at rooting our fraud and corruption on the Courts my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. Can you direct me to the Conservative policy/belief that opposes the Chief Justice looking into fraud and corruption in the Judicial Branch on account of their opposition to judicial activism?HHusky said:
This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.Dude61 said:John Roberts does nothing while the FISA court which he personally oversees illegally spied on an American citizen. He did nothing when DOJ determined the court was defrauded. But when a senator asked a question, Roberts shuts that down. Twice. What a fucking coward.
-
So TugCons thinks the Supreme Court should very publicly take on a case not presented to them. Yes, you cannot make this stuff up.SFGbob said:
I don't recall anyone opposing Judicial activism when directed at rooting our fraud and corruption on the Courts my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. Can you direct me to the Conservative policy/belief that opposes the Chief Justice looking into fraud and corruption in the Judicial Branch on account of their opposition to judicial activism?HHusky said:
This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.Dude61 said:John Roberts does nothing while the FISA court which he personally oversees illegally spied on an American citizen. He did nothing when DOJ determined the court was defrauded. But when a senator asked a question, Roberts shuts that down. Twice. What a fucking coward.
-
Who said anything about a case my lying Kunt of a friend?HHusky said:
So TugCons thinks the Supreme Court should very publicly take on a case not presented to them. Yes, you cannot make this stuff up.SFGbob said:
I don't recall anyone opposing Judicial activism when directed at rooting our fraud and corruption on the Courts my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. Can you direct me to the Conservative policy/belief that opposes the Chief Justice looking into fraud and corruption in the Judicial Branch on account of their opposition to judicial activism?HHusky said:
This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.Dude61 said:John Roberts does nothing while the FISA court which he personally oversees illegally spied on an American citizen. He did nothing when DOJ determined the court was defrauded. But when a senator asked a question, Roberts shuts that down. Twice. What a fucking coward.
-
America is being told that a CIA officer with documented political bias who lied on his whistle blower complaint to kick of the impeachment of a duly elected president is somehow beyond questioning.
-
Whooooooosh!SFGbob said:
Who said anything about a case my lying Kunt of a friend?HHusky said:
So TugCons thinks the Supreme Court should very publicly take on a case not presented to them. Yes, you cannot make this stuff up.SFGbob said:
I don't recall anyone opposing Judicial activism when directed at rooting our fraud and corruption on the Courts my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. Can you direct me to the Conservative policy/belief that opposes the Chief Justice looking into fraud and corruption in the Judicial Branch on account of their opposition to judicial activism?HHusky said:
This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.Dude61 said:John Roberts does nothing while the FISA court which he personally oversees illegally spied on an American citizen. He did nothing when DOJ determined the court was defrauded. But when a senator asked a question, Roberts shuts that down. Twice. What a fucking coward.
-
HHusky said:
» show previous quotes
This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.
You also can't make up the fact that Roberts is presiding over the Senate trial and as such makes rulings that allegedly are non partisan yet he's been a partisan hack since W nominated him
W the real conservative
Why is Roberts protecting Schiff and the whistleblower?
He can be impeached too -
Perhaps, like in the last two episodes of Ray Donovan, the judge is in on it too. Until he jumps out the window and gets whacked in the woods.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
» show previous quotes
This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.
You also can't make up the fact that Roberts is presiding over the Senate trial and as such makes rulings that allegedly are non partisan yet he's been a partisan hack since W nominated him
W the real conservative
Why is Roberts protecting Schiff and the whistleblower?
He can be impeached too
Honest to god, this whole thing is episodic TV. Is Aaron Sorkin the screenwriter for this whole shit show?
-
Roberts is a never Trumper like the rest o the Bush clan. He is clearly part of the problem and not impartial.PurpleThrobber said:
Perhaps, like in the last two episodes of Ray Donovan, the judge is in on it too. Until he jumps out the window and gets whacked in the woods.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
» show previous quotes
This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.
You also can't make up the fact that Roberts is presiding over the Senate trial and as such makes rulings that allegedly are non partisan yet he's been a partisan hack since W nominated him
W the real conservative
Why is Roberts protecting Schiff and the whistleblower?
He can be impeached too
Honest to god, this whole thing is episodic TV. Is Aaron Sorkin the screenwriter for this whole shit show? -
Fo' sho'. Bushes, Clintons...same coin different sides.RaceBannon said:
Roberts is a never Trumper like the rest o the Bush clan. He is clearly part of the problem and not impartial.PurpleThrobber said:
Perhaps, like in the last two episodes of Ray Donovan, the judge is in on it too. Until he jumps out the window and gets whacked in the woods.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
» show previous quotes
This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.
You also can't make up the fact that Roberts is presiding over the Senate trial and as such makes rulings that allegedly are non partisan yet he's been a partisan hack since W nominated him
W the real conservative
Why is Roberts protecting Schiff and the whistleblower?
He can be impeached too
Honest to god, this whole thing is episodic TV. Is Aaron Sorkin the screenwriter for this whole shit show?
RBG needs to die the fuck off so Trump can get his own guys in there to preside over the Senate trial in Impeachment: Part Deaux-MAGA's Revenge, coming Jan 2021 to a house of congress near you.
-
You Wooshed yourself dumbfuck. Roberts doesn't need to "take on the case" in order to address the abuse and fraud on the FISA court. You're nowhere near a fucking bright as you feel you are O'Keefed.HHusky said:
Whooooooosh!SFGbob said:
Who said anything about a case my lying Kunt of a friend?HHusky said:
So TugCons thinks the Supreme Court should very publicly take on a case not presented to them. Yes, you cannot make this stuff up.SFGbob said:
I don't recall anyone opposing Judicial activism when directed at rooting our fraud and corruption on the Courts my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. Can you direct me to the Conservative policy/belief that opposes the Chief Justice looking into fraud and corruption in the Judicial Branch on account of their opposition to judicial activism?HHusky said:
This from the team that deplores judicial activism. Can’t make this stuff up.Dude61 said:John Roberts does nothing while the FISA court which he personally oversees illegally spied on an American citizen. He did nothing when DOJ determined the court was defrauded. But when a senator asked a question, Roberts shuts that down. Twice. What a fucking coward.
-
Is this still a thing?
Is the left getting their hopes up again haha
When will they learn? Seriously how many times.
I want to say when Trump beats Biden maybe they'll figure it out but I know they won't.
Theyll be confused as to how America just keeps getting more evil and racist. When the millennials grow up they'll turn the nation blue!!!! -
Schiff just gave the most fucked up scenario I have ever seen - he just went off the deep end. He said if Trump is acquited he will ask the Russians to hack Burisma to get info on Biden. Then use that data to feed false narrative to win the election.
Jesus he sucks (edit - Schiff) -
Vote down more witnesses tomorrow. Then acquit.............move on.👍🏻
-
-
-
In case you wondered where Bolton falls on the spectrum
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton on Thursday defended the impeachment inquiry witnesses who have been attacked by President Trump, implicitly hitting back at similar criticism he has faced for his role in the process.
KXAN reported that as Bolton was speaking to a private gathering for an investment firm in Austin, Texas, he defended several of the officials who testified in the House impeachment hearings, including Alexander Vindman, William Taylor, Fiona Hill, Tim Morrison and Marie Yovanovitch.
"All of them acted in the best interest of the country as they saw it and consistent to what they thought our policies were," Bolton told the audience during a Q&A session, according to KXAN. "The idea that somehow testifying to what you think is true is destructive to the system of government we have — I think, is very nearly the reverse — the exact reverse of the truth."
Bullshit -
Bolton cashing in on speaking appearances and book deals.RaceBannon said:In case you wondered where Bolton falls on the spectrum
Former National Security Adviser John Bolton on Thursday defended the impeachment inquiry witnesses who have been attacked by President Trump, implicitly hitting back at similar criticism he has faced for his role in the process.
KXAN reported that as Bolton was speaking to a private gathering for an investment firm in Austin, Texas, he defended several of the officials who testified in the House impeachment hearings, including Alexander Vindman, William Taylor, Fiona Hill, Tim Morrison and Marie Yovanovitch.
"All of them acted in the best interest of the country as they saw it and consistent to what they thought our policies were," Bolton told the audience during a Q&A session, according to KXAN. "The idea that somehow testifying to what you think is true is destructive to the system of government we have — I think, is very nearly the reverse — the exact reverse of the truth."
Bullshit
When does he get appointed to a couple well paying Board of Director gigs?
-
And for the Hail Mary!!!!
At least the NYT is starting to be honest about their TDS. -
-
Figure a half gallon of vodka for Nancy.
-
Poor Nancy and Adam
Now the Dems will turn on them for their failure -
-
I've said this before. Two decades from now, historians will write about how the Dems blackmailed Roberts to make him their pool boyRaceBannon said:Roberts is running cover again
Rand Paul is going after him on the whistleblower -
With the NSA/CIA etc under Obama control I am certain they had some surveillance dirt to get him to flip from it's not a tax to it's a tax.DerekJohnson said:
I've said this before. Two decades from now, historians will write about how the Dems blackmailed Roberts to make him their pool boyRaceBannon said:Roberts is running cover again
Rand Paul is going after him on the whistleblower -
Roberts didn’t want to end up killing himself like Epstein.DerekJohnson said:
I've said this before. Two decades from now, historians will write about how the Dems blackmailed Roberts to make him their pool boyRaceBannon said:Roberts is running cover again
Rand Paul is going after him on the whistleblower -
ftfyPurpleThrobber said:
Roberts didn’t want to end up NOT killing himself like Epstein.DerekJohnson said:
I've said this before. Two decades from now, historians will write about how the Dems blackmailed Roberts to make him their pool boyRaceBannon said:Roberts is running cover again
Rand Paul is going after him on the whistleblower -
-
