Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Senate impeachment trial game thread
Comments
-
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt? -
Just as he "knew" that Trump really did collude with the Russians.RaceBannon said:H has been doing this since Mueller
Trump was really guilty then too. H just couldn't tell us why -
Your lack of reading comprehension has nothing to do with Trump's impeachment. HTHSFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt? -
H Knows that Trump is guilty because Trump failed to hand over the evidence that he's guilty to the House. This was obviously a strong enough case to move to impeachment.
-
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup. -
This time we really fucking mean itHHusky said:
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup.
Now who is desperate? -
Madam, you and I know the audience is the electorate. You already have a coordinated acquittal in hand. But we all know Bolton’s testimony will be more difficult to simply disregard on the election trail. You don’t want any more evidence to come out.RaceBannon said:
This time we really fucking mean itHHusky said:
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup.
Now who is desperate? -
To be fair. Trump's base will never hear his testimony as their news source won't report it. Just as they are making excuses why he shouldn't testify. And they won't care and will still vote for him.HHusky said:
Madam, you and I know the audience is the electorate. You already have a coordinated acquittal in hand. But we all know Bolton’s testimony will be more difficult to simply disregard on the election trail. You don’t want any more evidence to come out.RaceBannon said:
This time we really fucking mean itHHusky said:
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup.
Now who is desperate? -
Bolton isn't testifying and the campaign is all but in the bag for Trump thanks to the ass clowns you follow like a whipped puppyHHusky said:
Madam, you and I know the audience is the electorate. You already have a coordinated acquittal in hand. But we all know Bolton’s testimony will be more difficult to simply disregard on the election trail. You don’t want any more evidence to come out.RaceBannon said:
This time we really fucking mean itHHusky said:
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup.
Now who is desperate?
Nobody gives a shit. -
cricketsPurpleThrobber said:
From what puppy mill law school did you allegedly graduate?HHusky said:
It was spelled out very well this morning. The whole thing. You gals don’t seem to have any facts to contradict it, and curiously, you don’t seem to want the witnesses to come in and exonerate Daddy.RaceBannon said:I thought that no one would be stupid enough to fall for the democrats obvious play to not have any evidence of any crime but just hold their breath and cry for mommy until the bad man leaves
Then @HHusky showed people really are that stupid
Its a simple case. Allegedly. Spell it out and convict
Or shut the fuck up
No. Seriously - they don't teach your (lack of) logic or knowledge of legal process at any decent law school out there.
But go ahead a paraphrase what you think was 'spelled out'. In your own words. -
Sounds like they really got 'em this tim.HHusky said:
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup. -
You can watch the replay. I’m sure it’s on the google machine. It was a little over two hours.PurpleThrobber said:
cricketsPurpleThrobber said:
From what puppy mill law school did you allegedly graduate?HHusky said:
It was spelled out very well this morning. The whole thing. You gals don’t seem to have any facts to contradict it, and curiously, you don’t seem to want the witnesses to come in and exonerate Daddy.RaceBannon said:I thought that no one would be stupid enough to fall for the democrats obvious play to not have any evidence of any crime but just hold their breath and cry for mommy until the bad man leaves
Then @HHusky showed people really are that stupid
Its a simple case. Allegedly. Spell it out and convict
Or shut the fuck up
No. Seriously - they don't teach your (lack of) logic or knowledge of legal process at any decent law school out there.
But go ahead a paraphrase what you think was 'spelled out'. In your own words. -
Daddy’s already planting seeds to discredit Bolton. Just in case, of course.2001400ex said:
To be fair. Trump's base will never hear his testimony as their news source won't report it. Just as they are making excuses why he shouldn't testify. And they won't care and will still vote for him.HHusky said:
Madam, you and I know the audience is the electorate. You already have a coordinated acquittal in hand. But we all know Bolton’s testimony will be more difficult to simply disregard on the election trail. You don’t want any more evidence to come out.RaceBannon said:
This time we really fucking mean itHHusky said:
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup.
Now who is desperate? -
A question being dishonest? LOL! Wow, that is a new one. A thinking man would assume that someone of your advancing years would understand what a question is. Telling me to read the Federalist papers is like a lawyer trying to avoid a direct answer to a question. You are a lawyer right?HHusky said:
Yes, I remember your dishonest question. I’m crediting you with dishonesty because to suggest ignorance would be such an insult to a man of your advanced years. The Federalist papers can easily be accessed online. Have you bothered yet?Bendintheriver said:
I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.HHusky said:
If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.CuntWaffle said:
Jeezus HH. You have devolved into less than a challenge on here. I think that TDS is rotting your mind.
-
I can only assume you attended the Todd Graham School of Law because your reading comprehension sucks.HHusky said:
You can watch the replay. I’m sure it’s on the google machine. It was a little over two hours.PurpleThrobber said:
cricketsPurpleThrobber said:
From what puppy mill law school did you allegedly graduate?HHusky said:
It was spelled out very well this morning. The whole thing. You gals don’t seem to have any facts to contradict it, and curiously, you don’t seem to want the witnesses to come in and exonerate Daddy.RaceBannon said:I thought that no one would be stupid enough to fall for the democrats obvious play to not have any evidence of any crime but just hold their breath and cry for mommy until the bad man leaves
Then @HHusky showed people really are that stupid
Its a simple case. Allegedly. Spell it out and convict
Or shut the fuck up
No. Seriously - they don't teach your (lack of) logic or knowledge of legal process at any decent law school out there.
But go ahead a paraphrase what you think was 'spelled out'. In your own words.
But go ahead and paraphrase what you think was 'spelled out'. In your own words.
-
Hammer coming any day now?HHusky said:
Madam, you and I know the audience is the electorate. You already have a coordinated acquittal in hand. But we all know Bolton’s testimony will be more difficult to simply disregard on the election trail. You don’t want any more evidence to come out.RaceBannon said:
This time we really fucking mean itHHusky said:
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup.
Now who is desperate? -
What a sparkling legal mind......HHusky said:
It was spelled out very well this morning. The whole thing. You gals don’t seem to have any facts to contradict it, and curiously, you don’t seem to want the witnesses to come in and exonerate Daddy.RaceBannon said:I thought that no one would be stupid enough to fall for the democrats obvious play to not have any evidence of any crime but just hold their breath and cry for mommy until the bad man leaves
Then @HHusky showed people really are that stupid
Its a simple case. Allegedly. Spell it out and convict
Or shut the fuck up -
have any of you impeached a president before? That’s what I thought
-
The acquittal is in the bag, ma'am. No one is saying otherwise.CuntWaffle said:
Hammer coming any day now?HHusky said:
Madam, you and I know the audience is the electorate. You already have a coordinated acquittal in hand. But we all know Bolton’s testimony will be more difficult to simply disregard on the election trail. You don’t want any more evidence to come out.RaceBannon said:
This time we really fucking mean itHHusky said:
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup.
Now who is desperate?
-
More cricketsPurpleThrobber said:
I can only assume you attended the Todd Graham School of Law because your reading comprehension sucks.HHusky said:
You can watch the replay. I’m sure it’s on the google machine. It was a little over two hours.PurpleThrobber said:
cricketsPurpleThrobber said:
From what puppy mill law school did you allegedly graduate?HHusky said:
It was spelled out very well this morning. The whole thing. You gals don’t seem to have any facts to contradict it, and curiously, you don’t seem to want the witnesses to come in and exonerate Daddy.RaceBannon said:I thought that no one would be stupid enough to fall for the democrats obvious play to not have any evidence of any crime but just hold their breath and cry for mommy until the bad man leaves
Then @HHusky showed people really are that stupid
Its a simple case. Allegedly. Spell it out and convict
Or shut the fuck up
No. Seriously - they don't teach your (lack of) logic or knowledge of legal process at any decent law school out there.
But go ahead a paraphrase what you think was 'spelled out'. In your own words.
But go ahead and paraphrase what you think was 'spelled out'. In your own words. -
JFC you’re grossHHusky said:
Daddy’s already planting seeds to discredit Bolton. Just in case, of course.2001400ex said:
To be fair. Trump's base will never hear his testimony as their news source won't report it. Just as they are making excuses why he shouldn't testify. And they won't care and will still vote for him.HHusky said:
Madam, you and I know the audience is the electorate. You already have a coordinated acquittal in hand. But we all know Bolton’s testimony will be more difficult to simply disregard on the election trail. You don’t want any more evidence to come out.RaceBannon said:
This time we really fucking mean itHHusky said:
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup.
Now who is desperate? -
Like a DOGCuntWaffle said:
Hammer coming any day now?HHusky said:
Madam, you and I know the audience is the electorate. You already have a coordinated acquittal in hand. But we all know Bolton’s testimony will be more difficult to simply disregard on the election trail. You don’t want any more evidence to come out.RaceBannon said:
This time we really fucking mean itHHusky said:
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup.
Now who is desperate? -
Does mid February sometime around Valentine's day work for you?MikeDamone said:
Like a DOGCuntWaffle said:
Hammer coming any day now?HHusky said:
Madam, you and I know the audience is the electorate. You already have a coordinated acquittal in hand. But we all know Bolton’s testimony will be more difficult to simply disregard on the election trail. You don’t want any more evidence to come out.RaceBannon said:
This time we really fucking mean itHHusky said:
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup.
Now who is desperate? -
Yes. As long as it’s done before my vacation I’m goodDoogles said:
Does mid February sometime around Valentine's day work for you?MikeDamone said:
Like a DOGCuntWaffle said:
Hammer coming any day now?HHusky said:
Madam, you and I know the audience is the electorate. You already have a coordinated acquittal in hand. But we all know Bolton’s testimony will be more difficult to simply disregard on the election trail. You don’t want any more evidence to come out.RaceBannon said:
This time we really fucking mean itHHusky said:
There’s plenty of evidence to convict now, and no contrary evidence in fact. But that’s not a legal excuse for wrongly withholding further documents and witnesses.SFGbob said:
Schiff and the Rats have been telling us they already had overwhelming evidence to convict Trump. Now you're crying because Trump hasn't given them the evidence. If Trump is in violation of the law the Rats were free to take him to court. They didn't do it, so shut the fuck up.HHusky said:
Daddy was legally required to turn over non-privileged materials and withhold only what he reasonably claimed was privileged. A blanket privilege as to everything your opponent wants to know is not a thing. Just so you know, you won’t be able to avoid producing your financial records when your wife’s attorney asks for them. There is no “I don’t wanna!” privilege.SFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.SFGbob said:
Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.HHusky said:
There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.SFGbob said:
The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?HHusky said:
There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?UW_Doog_Bot said:
HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.HHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed. You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?
I’m not crying at all. But I know you’re worried that Daddy’s conduct won’t be deniable once Bolton and Mulvaney are under oath. You gals are desperate for a coverup.
Now who is desperate? -
When Mueller testifies it's over
The walls are closing in
-
@CirrhosisDawg true?HHusky said:
It’s been proven. Hell, it’s been admitted. No one doubts acquittal will follow.RaceBannon said:
What guilt? Prove it bitchHHusky said:
I understand you’re going to win and that Daddy’s guilt isn’t relevant. But I thought you girls were looking for exoneration.RaceBannon said:
Knowing full well that the morons you follow will never let Joe testifyHHusky said:
Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!RaceBannon said:
Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.HHusky said:
I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.UW_Doog_Bot said:
It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?HHusky said:
Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.HHusky said:
Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.UW_Doog_Bot said:I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
This is why you're a partisan shill.
He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground
Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
Trump has no reason to testify since there is no case against him
All the shit you idiots have talked for three years and here we are with you crying about the refs like fucking coogs -
-
Liberals are vegans you idiot.Sledog said:
-
Nadler ate it.Sledog said: -
PurpleThrobber said:
More cricketsPurpleThrobber said:
I can only assume you attended the Todd Graham School of Law because your reading comprehension sucks.HHusky said:
You can watch the replay. I’m sure it’s on the google machine. It was a little over two hours.PurpleThrobber said:
cricketsPurpleThrobber said:
From what puppy mill law school did you allegedly graduate?HHusky said:
It was spelled out very well this morning. The whole thing. You gals don’t seem to have any facts to contradict it, and curiously, you don’t seem to want the witnesses to come in and exonerate Daddy.RaceBannon said:I thought that no one would be stupid enough to fall for the democrats obvious play to not have any evidence of any crime but just hold their breath and cry for mommy until the bad man leaves
Then @HHusky showed people really are that stupid
Its a simple case. Allegedly. Spell it out and convict
Or shut the fuck up
No. Seriously - they don't teach your (lack of) logic or knowledge of legal process at any decent law school out there.
But go ahead a paraphrase what you think was 'spelled out'. In your own words.
But go ahead and paraphrase what you think was 'spelled out'. In your own words.
