Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Husky Jacks open thread [2020]
Comments
-
-
why? if you've got a play that works keep using it until it doesn't work. i like the brand building on this one. use it a lot... use it consistently as that wink wink that a recruit is about to commit or something but fucking keep revving the engine on a purple muscle car and use it. way better than a 48 minute video of boating to work and being at the office before the janitor... who fucking cares if you can get up at 5am when your competitors are staying up til 3am recruiting.CallMeBigErn said:
A classic, but Jimmy needs some new material.GrundleStiltzkin said: -
Slick Jimmy?
-
-
Both teams too high. PFF likes us a lot better than anyone else. Metric type stuff puts so much emphasis on close losses and blowout wins.GrundleStiltzkin said:For my PFF Guys™
-
Oregonian (Ken Goe) preseason rankings:
1. Oregon
2. Arizona State
3. Cal
4. USC
5. Utah
6. Oregon State
7. Washington
8. Stanford
9. Colorado
10. Washington State
11. UCLA
12. Arizona
-
Obligatory Cal too high.
UW at 7 is a joke imo. -
I love how the media is so fucking desperate to rank USC...fucking hell their coaching is still shit, their recruiting has been going downhill for the last 3 years and their QBs are literally getting injured week-in, week-out. As if JT Daniels sticks around if he doesn't win the job outright.biak1 said:Obligatory Cal too high.
UW at 7 is a joke imo. -
We were not that far from it this year. Let’s see what Donovan and the boys have for us. Woof.biak1 said:Obligatory Cal too high.
UW at 7 is a joke imo. -
Upsets happen. If the score differential is within 1-3 points the better team wins 60% of the time. 4-7 it gets to the better team 65% of the time.RoadDawg55 said:
Both teams too high. PFF likes us a lot better than anyone else. Metric type stuff puts so much emphasis on close losses and blowout wins.GrundleStiltzkin said:For my PFF Guys™
The reason why that makes some people here so jaded is our systematic close losses. The mental aspect of that isn't really captured well by "the metrics". It is somewhat fair that we're rated highly because we have the horses to win and we've shown we can play with good teams. We just had the zit factor with Pete where we didn't get the W's.
The algorithm that captures mental toughness first will win.
