Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Chintersing Story...
DoogieMcDoogerson
Member Posts: 2,509
in Tug Tavern
Boy I'd love some to see these details see the light of day. I have this sense that Schiff is a corrupt politician. Will be interesting to see what Judicial Watch digs up. Of course, this will all be squashed by the media, but nevertheless will be interesting to know.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/01/02/getting_the_goods_on_schiff_142062.html
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/01/02/getting_the_goods_on_schiff_142062.html
Comments
-
Is the impeachment still on?
-
Dirt bags on both sides but the left has the numbers.
-
Schiff spying on fellow congressmen Nunes without any warrant is all you need to know about him.
-
Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .
I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now. -
You still peddling this bullshit?HHusky said:Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .
I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.
How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam
-
The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.RaceBannon said:
You still peddling this bullshit?HHusky said:Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .
I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.
How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam
Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you? -
Embarrassing.HHusky said:Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .
I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.
-
There has been no relevant evidence as exhibited by your inability to show anything other than the same bullshit you've been peddling since MuellerHHusky said:
The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.RaceBannon said:
You still peddling this bullshit?HHusky said:Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .
I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.
How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam
Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?
The first hand evidence is the transcript which has no relation to your dreams of impeachment -
HHusky said:
The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.RaceBannon said:
You still peddling this bullshit?HHusky said:Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .
I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.
How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam
Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?Southerndawg said:
Embarrassing.HHusky said:Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .
I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now. -
Race missed the emails that show evidence Trump was withholding aid.RaceBannon said:
There has been no relevant evidence as exhibited by your inability to show anything other than the same bullshit you've been peddling since MuellerHHusky said:
The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.RaceBannon said:
You still peddling this bullshit?HHusky said:Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .
I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.
How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam
Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?
The first hand evidence is the transcript which has no relation to your dreams of impeachment -
Schiff is another corrupt establishment dem from California. It's amazing to see how far that state has fallen.UW_Doog_Bot said:Schiff spying on fellow congressmen Nunes without any warrant is all you need to know about him.
-
With all of this "relevant evidence " and "facts" you can, without a doubt, plainly and simply quote for us the statutes that have been violated in the two articles of impeachment.HHusky said:
The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.RaceBannon said:
You still peddling this bullshit?HHusky said:Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .
I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.
How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam
Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?
What crimes were committed?
Please regale us with your vast constitutional knowledge of this.
After all, there is a clear and present danger to us all.
(Just ignore that Pelosi suddenly doesn't see that present danger.) -
Hands up dont shootRaceBannon said:
There has been no relevant evidence as exhibited by your inability to show anything other than the same bullshit you've been peddling since MuellerHHusky said:
The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.RaceBannon said:
You still peddling this bullshit?HHusky said:Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .
I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.
How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam
Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?
The first hand evidence is the transcript which has no relation to your dreams of impeachment -
No one cares about Ukraine
-
Joe Biden did and his cokehead kid got paid. Trump being concerned about the Biden-Ukraine and all around Ukraine corruption is the actual corruption because ...
-
Yet - you still haven't provide the citation to the US Criminal Code whereby the POTUS allegedly committed 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. Just cite the criminal code.HHusky said:
The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.RaceBannon said:
You still peddling this bullshit?HHusky said:Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .
I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.
How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam
Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?
For a lawyer, this should be quite simple.
