Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Chintersing Story...

2»

Comments

  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,363 Founders Club

    Schiff spying on fellow congressmen Nunes without any warrant is all you need to know about him.

    Schiff is another corrupt establishment dem from California. It's amazing to see how far that state has fallen.
  • Blu82
    Blu82 Member Posts: 1,673
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

    I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

    You still peddling this bullshit?

    How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam

    The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.

    Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?
    With all of this "relevant evidence " and "facts" you can, without a doubt, plainly and simply quote for us the statutes that have been violated in the two articles of impeachment.
    What crimes were committed?
    Please regale us with your vast constitutional knowledge of this.
    After all, there is a clear and present danger to us all.
    (Just ignore that Pelosi suddenly doesn't see that present danger.)
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,321 Founders Club

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

    I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

    You still peddling this bullshit?

    How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam

    The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.

    Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?
    There has been no relevant evidence as exhibited by your inability to show anything other than the same bullshit you've been peddling since Mueller

    The first hand evidence is the transcript which has no relation to your dreams of impeachment
    Hands up dont shoot
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,695
    No one cares about Ukraine
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,085 Standard Supporter
    Joe Biden did and his cokehead kid got paid. Trump being concerned about the Biden-Ukraine and all around Ukraine corruption is the actual corruption because ...
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,939 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

    I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

    You still peddling this bullshit?

    How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam

    The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.

    Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?
    Yet - you still haven't provide the citation to the US Criminal Code whereby the POTUS allegedly committed 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. Just cite the criminal code.

    For a lawyer, this should be quite simple.