Chintersing Story...

DoogieMcDoogerson

Boy I'd love some to see these details see the light of day. I have this sense that Schiff is a corrupt politician. Will be interesting to see what Judicial Watch digs up. Of course, this will all be squashed by the media, but nevertheless will be interesting to know.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/01/02/getting_the_goods_on_schiff_142062.html

RaceBannon

Is the impeachment still on?

Sledog

Dirt bags on both sides but the left has the numbers.

UW_Doog_Bot

Schiff spying on fellow congressmen Nunes without any warrant is all you need to know about him.

HHusky

Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

You still peddling this bullshit?

How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

You still peddling this bullshit?

How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam

The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.

Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?

Southerndawg

HHusky said:

Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

Embarrassing.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

You still peddling this bullshit?

How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam

The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.

Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?

There has been no relevant evidence as exhibited by your inability to show anything other than the same bullshit you've been peddling since Mueller

The first hand evidence is the transcript which has no relation to your dreams of impeachment

Southerndawg

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

You still peddling this bullshit?

How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam

The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.

Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?

Southerndawg said:

HHusky said:

Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

Embarrassing.

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

You still peddling this bullshit?

How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam

The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.

Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?

There has been no relevant evidence as exhibited by your inability to show anything other than the same bullshit you've been peddling since Mueller

The first hand evidence is the transcript which has no relation to your dreams of impeachment

Race missed the emails that show evidence Trump was withholding aid.

Southerndawg

UW_Doog_Bot said:

Schiff spying on fellow congressmen Nunes without any warrant is all you need to know about him.

Schiff is another corrupt establishment dem from California. It's amazing to see how far that state has fallen.

Blu82

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

You still peddling this bullshit?

How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam

The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.

Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?

With all of this "relevant evidence " and "facts" you can, without a doubt, plainly and simply quote for us the statutes that have been violated in the two articles of impeachment.
What crimes were committed?
Please regale us with your vast constitutional knowledge of this.
After all, there is a clear and present danger to us all.
(Just ignore that Pelosi suddenly doesn't see that present danger.)

RoadTrip

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

You still peddling this bullshit?

How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam

The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.

Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?

There has been no relevant evidence as exhibited by your inability to show anything other than the same bullshit you've been peddling since Mueller

The first hand evidence is the transcript which has no relation to your dreams of impeachment

Hands up dont shoot

Pitchfork51

No one cares about Ukraine

WestlinnDuck

Joe Biden did and his cokehead kid got paid. Trump being concerned about the Biden-Ukraine and all around Ukraine corruption is the actual corruption because ...

PurpleThrobber

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Whistleblower’s account is true, but but but . . .

I’m sure Schiff will be going to jail any day now.

You still peddling this bullshit?

How is the account true? Can you point to his testimony? Was he listening to the call? We have the transcript. You have a third hand piece of shit partaking in a scam

The transcript is consistent with the whistleblower account, as is all of the testimony. The whistleblower’s account isn’t relevant evidence, but it has plainly led to the discovery of relevant evidence.

Your strategy of refusing to engage with the facts may work politically—I’m certainly not an admirer of the common man’s patriotism or his intelligence. But you know better than to be parroting this lack of first hand knowledge canard, don’t you?

Yet - you still haven't provide the citation to the US Criminal Code whereby the POTUS allegedly committed 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. Just cite the criminal code.

For a lawyer, this should be quite simple.