Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Who do you WANT the starting QB to be against Michigan?

2

Comments

  • PandaOrangeChiknDuck
    PandaOrangeChiknDuck Member Posts: 545
    edited December 2019
    Garbers
    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    Costello.

    I understand the liking to Costello, but it's hard not to believe a lot of his success has been from having some of the best TEs in CFB to throw the ball to. I don't think Washington has any 6'7"-6'8" large framed TE like Stanford had. I also don't think they even have a large bodied wide receiver on the outside like he had at Stanford. I think Costello would be a little underwhelming in Washington's system.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OreDawg
    OreDawg Member Posts: 673
    Sirmon
    PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    Costello.

    I understand the liking to Costello, but it's hard not to believe a lot of his success has been from having some of the best TEs in CFB to throw the ball to. I don't think Washington has any 6'7"-6'8" large framed TE like Stanford had. I also don't think they even have a large bodied wide receiver on the outside like he had at Stanford. I think Costello would be a little underwhelming in Washington's system.
    I don’t really want Costello, but in fairness we have no idea what Washington’s system will be and how he would fit into it. Also in regards to your comment on tall receivers, I think Mark Redman will play this year and he definitely fits the mold of a Stanford size receiving TE.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PandaOrangeChiknDuck
    PandaOrangeChiknDuck Member Posts: 545
    Garbers
    OreDawg said:

    PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    Costello.

    I understand the liking to Costello, but it's hard not to believe a lot of his success has been from having some of the best TEs in CFB to throw the ball to. I don't think Washington has any 6'7"-6'8" large framed TE like Stanford had. I also don't think they even have a large bodied wide receiver on the outside like he had at Stanford. I think Costello would be a little underwhelming in Washington's system.
    I don’t really want Costello, but in fairness we have no idea what Washington’s system will be and how he would fit into it. Also in regards to your comment on tall receivers, I think Mark Redman will play this year and he definitely fits the mold of a Stanford size receiving TE.
    That's fair
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,051 Founders Club
    Gladstone said:

    Costello just followed the LSU OC on Twitter. Ship sailed.

    Winners win

    Losers explain why they couldn't

    He was a perfect fit for a year here


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PandaOrangeChiknDuck
    PandaOrangeChiknDuck Member Posts: 545
    Garbers
    RaceBannon said:

    Two ducks were opposed to Costello coming here. Now ask yourself why

    I'm not opposed to Costello. I just don't think he'll be as good at UW as he was two years ago at Stanford. He's definitely serviceable, but if you're relying on him like you guys did Eason, you will be just as underwhelmed. I guess it depends on who the new OC will be.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,790 Swaye's Wigwam
    PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:

    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    Costello.

    I understand the liking to Costello, but it's hard not to believe a lot of his success has been from having some of the best TEs in CFB to throw the ball to. I don't think Washington has any 6'7"-6'8" large framed TE like Stanford had. I also don't think they even have a large bodied wide receiver on the outside like he had at Stanford. I think Costello would be a little underwhelming in Washington's system.
    we have a system?

    My vote is any of the above
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,772 Founders Club
    Morris
    RaceBannon said:

    Two ducks were opposed to Costello coming here. Now ask yourself why

    Ask yourself why you don't have any desire for a quarterback that tore out your heart and ate it in 2017 and was a redzone decision from tearing out Darnold's heart as well.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,143
    Garbers
    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    Costello.

    This. Let’s not be stupid. He’s more proven and very likely better than any QB we have. He’s also had a season that was quite a bit better than Eason’s best.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dOgmaster
    dOgmaster Member Posts: 589
    Sirmon
    I voted for Sirmon because I think he is the #2 qb behind Morris. There had to be some reason for his failed transfer attempt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,143
    Garbers
    AtomicDawg said:

    I would love for Sirmon to put it all together but don’t think he has it in him. Wasn’t impressed by sirmon nor Morris in high school. I will roll with The unknown.

    This is how I feel. Simply because I know the least about him, I’ll choose Garbers. Morris and especially Sirmon seem like nothing special.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,790 Swaye's Wigwam
    how do we? manage to recruit the crappiest 4 star QBs consistently? then step up to a 5 star and destroy his confidence?

    if I was Huard I would run as fast as I could to a school that appreciates QBs
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,513
    Sirmon
    LebamDawg said:

    how do we? manage to recruit the crappiest 4 star QBs consistently? then step up to a 5 star and destroy his confidence?

    if I was Huard I would run as fast as I could to a school that appreciates QBs

    Maybe the 5 star was also crappy.

    The line of failed former 4 and 5 star qbs is incredibly long. Its not just us. Go back and look at the list of qbs Oregon, USC, UCLA, etc have pulled in over the last 10 years and see how many have actually done anything meaningful.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fear_Boner
    Fear_Boner Member Posts: 808
    Sirmon
    Swaye said:

    But seriously, Morris. I already know Sirmon is a bag of dicks.

    I’m fucking outta here if we’re going to start bashing a bag of dicks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    No clue who any of those people are.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,298 Standard Supporter
    Sirmon
    Wouldn't Garbers have to sit a year?







































    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Domicillo
    Domicillo Member Posts: 3,025
    Sirmon
    Gladstone said:

    Costello just followed the LSU OC on Twitter. Ship sailed.

    Wouldn’t you?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,763
    BleachedAnusDawg said:

    Costello.

    This, only way to ensure Huard starts like Brownsocks
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,143
    Garbers
    dOgmaster said:

    I voted for Sirmon because I think he is the #2 qb behind Morris. There had to be some reason for his failed transfer attempt.

    I think it was because he was, at least to the coaches, far behind Haener. So if Haener started after Eason, Sirmon would only have one year as a potential starter and he knows Huard is coming too.

    I’ll be surprised if Sirmon ever starts. My guess is he transfers. It could be after the season so he can be a grad transfer, but it will happen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,143
    Garbers
    LebamDawg said:

    how do we? manage to recruit the crappiest 4 star QBs consistently? then step up to a 5 star and destroy his confidence?

    if I was Huard I would run as fast as I could to a school that appreciates QBs

    Our offense sucks. That’s the reason. That said, most 4 and 5 star QB’s flame out. Only one can play, at least for 95% of the schools worth a shit. It’s not like another position with multiple starters or where you can share time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Measure their penises. Biggest man wins.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    whlinder said:

    Due to our contractual requirement to start Jacob at QB.


    Also we already have our hatred of Jacob the QB ready to unleash.

    @Jake4Heisman
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    Domicillo said:

    Gladstone said:

    Costello just followed the LSU OC on Twitter. Ship sailed.

    Wouldn’t you?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,683 Swaye's Wigwam
    Sirmon
    PurpleJ said:

    Measure their penises. Biggest man wins.

    Don't t count out the little skinny guy (Morris). Big guys like Sirmon aren't always swinging around a big schlong. I went to HS and played hoops with a guy who graduated at 6'9" and had offers everywhere. He followed David Robinson to Navy, and ended up transferring to Pitt. Drafted around #30 by the Celtics and didn't last long. He was 6'11 by that point.

    Anyways, point was the guy had about a 3" dick, and that's me projecting the potential growth of the little nub we'd see and snicker about in the locker room. Probably being generous.

    CSB.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,004
    Write In:

    Jake Browning

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    edited December 2019
    chuck said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Measure their penises. Biggest man wins.

    Don't t count out the little skinny guy (Morris). Big guys like Sirmon aren't always swinging around a big schlong. I went to HS and played hoops with a guy who graduated at 6'9" and had offers everywhere. He followed David Robinson to Navy, and ended up transferring to Pitt. Drafted around #30 by the Celtics and didn't last long. He was 6'11 by that point.

    Anyways, point was the guy had about a 3" dick, and that's me projecting the potential growth of the little nub we'd see and snicker about in the locker room. Probably being generous.

    CSB.


    Imagine having your cock dwarfed by a 5‘8” soccer-loving princess.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    PurpleJ said:

    chuck said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Measure their penises. Biggest man wins.

    Don't t count out the little skinny guy (Morris). Big guys like Sirmon aren't always swinging around a big schlong. I went to HS and played hoops with a guy who graduated at 6'9" and had offers everywhere. He followed David Robinson to Navy, and ended up transferring to Pitt. Drafted around #30 by the Celtics and didn't last long. He was 6'11 by that point.

    Anyways, point was the guy had about a 3" dick, and that's me projecting the potential growth of the little nub we'd see and snicker about in the locker room. Probably being generous.

    CSB.


    Imagine having your cock dwarfed by a 5‘8” soccer-loving princess.


    I couldn't find anything about his penis length on google but he does have three tall daughters.

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter