Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Who do you WANT the starting QB to be against Michigan?
Comments
-
Garbers
I understand the liking to Costello, but it's hard not to believe a lot of his success has been from having some of the best TEs in CFB to throw the ball to. I don't think Washington has any 6'7"-6'8" large framed TE like Stanford had. I also don't think they even have a large bodied wide receiver on the outside like he had at Stanford. I think Costello would be a little underwhelming in Washington's system.BleachedAnusDawg said:Costello.
-
Sirmon
I don’t really want Costello, but in fairness we have no idea what Washington’s system will be and how he would fit into it. Also in regards to your comment on tall receivers, I think Mark Redman will play this year and he definitely fits the mold of a Stanford size receiving TE.PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:
I understand the liking to Costello, but it's hard not to believe a lot of his success has been from having some of the best TEs in CFB to throw the ball to. I don't think Washington has any 6'7"-6'8" large framed TE like Stanford had. I also don't think they even have a large bodied wide receiver on the outside like he had at Stanford. I think Costello would be a little underwhelming in Washington's system.BleachedAnusDawg said:Costello.
-
-
Garbers
That's fairOreDawg said:
I don’t really want Costello, but in fairness we have no idea what Washington’s system will be and how he would fit into it. Also in regards to your comment on tall receivers, I think Mark Redman will play this year and he definitely fits the mold of a Stanford size receiving TE.PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:
I understand the liking to Costello, but it's hard not to believe a lot of his success has been from having some of the best TEs in CFB to throw the ball to. I don't think Washington has any 6'7"-6'8" large framed TE like Stanford had. I also don't think they even have a large bodied wide receiver on the outside like he had at Stanford. I think Costello would be a little underwhelming in Washington's system.BleachedAnusDawg said:Costello.
-
Costello just followed the LSU OC on Twitter. Ship sailed.
-
Winners winGladstone said:Costello just followed the LSU OC on Twitter. Ship sailed.
Losers explain why they couldn't
He was a perfect fit for a year here
-
Two ducks were opposed to Costello coming here. Now ask yourself why
-
Garbers
I'm not opposed to Costello. I just don't think he'll be as good at UW as he was two years ago at Stanford. He's definitely serviceable, but if you're relying on him like you guys did Eason, you will be just as underwhelmed. I guess it depends on who the new OC will be.RaceBannon said:Two ducks were opposed to Costello coming here. Now ask yourself why
-
we have a system?PandaOrangeChiknDuck said:
I understand the liking to Costello, but it's hard not to believe a lot of his success has been from having some of the best TEs in CFB to throw the ball to. I don't think Washington has any 6'7"-6'8" large framed TE like Stanford had. I also don't think they even have a large bodied wide receiver on the outside like he had at Stanford. I think Costello would be a little underwhelming in Washington's system.BleachedAnusDawg said:Costello.
My vote is any of the above -
Morris
Ask yourself why you don't have any desire for a quarterback that tore out your heart and ate it in 2017 and was a redzone decision from tearing out Darnold's heart as well.RaceBannon said:Two ducks were opposed to Costello coming here. Now ask yourself why
