Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Diamond Head Classic OFFICIAL Thread

1246711

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,390 Standard Supporter

    Uw is getting a pass for how terrible they have played this evening. Passive would be the nicest way i can say it. Their record will not translate to pac12 schedule as they are playing

    PAC 12 will be tough with Oregon and Arizona. Utah has a big win vs Kentucky too.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,281

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    Ball state is a Good opponent!!!

    So is Texas Southern!!
    No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.
    I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference.

    Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...

    See the difference? Jesus.
    Umm, seems like those two descriptions make the same point cum stain. Or do you mean something else by "good opponent who we beat by 20+"?
  • BroadcastingDawg
    BroadcastingDawg Member Posts: 1,592
    edited December 2019

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    Ball state is a Good opponent!!!

    So is Texas Southern!!
    No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.
    I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference.

    Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...

    See the difference? Jesus.
    Umm, seems like those two descriptions make the same point cum stain. Or do you mean something else by "good opponent who we beat by 20+"?
    No. They're not one in the same. If it was a good good win I would have said as much.

    I thought beating them by 20+ was a quality performance... a good win would be eeking one out against Baylor.
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,231

    Uw is getting a pass for how terrible they have played this evening. Passive would be the nicest way i can say it. Their record will not translate to pac12 schedule as they are playing

    PAC 12 will be tough with Oregon and Arizona. Utah has a big win vs Kentucky too.
    I think USC is super talented this year, as well. Just depends if Enfield can get out of the way or not
  • dawgs206
    dawgs206 Member Posts: 482
    PAC-12 ranks/predicted finish in conference

    Tier 1
    Oregon
    UW
    Arizona
    Colorado

    Tier 2
    Oregon State
    USC
    Stanford
    Utah

    Tier 3
    ASU
    UCLA
    WSU

    Tier 4
    Cal
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    dawgs206 said:

    PAC-12 ranks/predicted finish in conference

    Tier 1
    Oregon
    UW
    Arizona
    Colorado

    Tier 2
    Oregon State
    USC
    Stanford
    Utah

    Tier 3
    ASU
    UCLA
    WSU

    Tier 4
    Cal

    Cal still too high.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,281

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    Ball state is a Good opponent!!!

    So is Texas Southern!!
    No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.
    I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference.

    Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...

    See the difference? Jesus.
    Umm, seems like those two descriptions make the same point cum stain. Or do you mean something else by "good opponent who we beat by 20+"?
    No. They're not one in the same. If it was a good good win I would have said as much.

    I thought beating them by 20+ was a quality performance... a good win would be eeking one out against Baylor.
    JFC. As if the phrase, "it was a good win" had a precise meaning. Fuck outta here with your weak ass rationalized point of view.
  • BroadcastingDawg
    BroadcastingDawg Member Posts: 1,592
    dawgs206 said:

    PAC-12 ranks/predicted finish in conference

    Tier 1
    Oregon
    UW
    Arizona
    Colorado

    Tier 2
    Oregon State
    USC
    Stanford
    Utah

    Tier 3
    ASU
    UCLA
    WSU

    Tier 4
    Cal

    I fucking hate Joe Lunardi.

    You know he has UW currently in the tournament as a 10 seed and dropping?

    But he has Arizona in at a solid 5.

    Arizona has lost to the only 2 ranked teams they've played, Baylor and Gonzaga... UW beat Baylor and lost to Gonzaga...

    Arizona struggled immensely against 2x mid majors in South Dakota St. and Pepperdine... really should have lost to Pepperdine if it weren't for a major stroke of luck on a loose ball late.

    Seriously, fuck that guy.
  • Miley_Cyrus
    Miley_Cyrus Member Posts: 842
    dawgs206 said:

    PAC-12 ranks/predicted finish in conference

    Tier 1
    Oregon
    UW
    Arizona
    Colorado

    Tier 2
    Oregon State
    USC
    Stanford
    Utah

    Tier 3
    ASU
    UCLA
    WSU

    Tier 4
    Cal

    Furd too low. They good this year.
  • dawgs206
    dawgs206 Member Posts: 482

    dawgs206 said:

    PAC-12 ranks/predicted finish in conference

    Tier 1
    Oregon
    UW
    Arizona
    Colorado

    Tier 2
    Oregon State
    USC
    Stanford
    Utah

    Tier 3
    ASU
    UCLA
    WSU

    Tier 4
    Cal

    Furd too low. They good this year.
    Probably true. They’ve mainly beat up on a weak non-conference schedule, but they took down Butler and destroyed Oklahoma (who beat Oregon State). Their Net ranking will drop, but yea, they could be top of Tier 2. I gave the edge to OSU because of Tinkle probably being the best college player in the PAC, but would switch them and USC if I could edit my OP.