Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Diamond Head Classic OFFICIAL Thread
Comments
-
That's not how the quads work. They aren't 25% each. You have to be top 150 out of over 300 on nuetral court for quad 3.ntxduck said:
So 75% of teams are classified as good? Sure2001400ex said:
Net, RPI, KenPom, and Sagarin all disagree with you. Quad 3 is "good". Quad 4 is "shit". Quad 2 is "pretty good". Quad 1 is "great". HTHntxduck said:
Ball state is not a good opponent. At all. By any metric.BroadcastingDawg said:
I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference.ntxduck said:
No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.backthepack said:
So is Texas Southern!!ntxduck said:Ball state is a Good opponent!!!
Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...
See the difference? Jesus. -
So 150 of 320 d1 teams are “good”? Someone tell the cougs they’re good, they’ll be thrilled2001400ex said:
That's not how the quads work. They aren't 25% each. You have to be top 150 out of over 300 on nuetral court for quad 3.ntxduck said:
So 75% of teams are classified as good? Sure2001400ex said:
Net, RPI, KenPom, and Sagarin all disagree with you. Quad 3 is "good". Quad 4 is "shit". Quad 2 is "pretty good". Quad 1 is "great". HTHntxduck said:
Ball state is not a good opponent. At all. By any metric.BroadcastingDawg said:
I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference.ntxduck said:
No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.backthepack said:
So is Texas Southern!!ntxduck said:Ball state is a Good opponent!!!
Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...
See the difference? Jesus. -
Well they are 128. So sure.ntxduck said:
So 150 of 320 d1 teams are “good”? Someone tell the cougs they’re good, they’ll be thrilled2001400ex said:
That's not how the quads work. They aren't 25% each. You have to be top 150 out of over 300 on nuetral court for quad 3.ntxduck said:
So 75% of teams are classified as good? Sure2001400ex said:
Net, RPI, KenPom, and Sagarin all disagree with you. Quad 3 is "good". Quad 4 is "shit". Quad 2 is "pretty good". Quad 1 is "great". HTHntxduck said:
Ball state is not a good opponent. At all. By any metric.BroadcastingDawg said:
I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference.ntxduck said:
No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.backthepack said:
So is Texas Southern!!ntxduck said:Ball state is a Good opponent!!!
Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...
See the difference? Jesus.
-
And last part of first half and most of this half we have been pushing the ball and playing better. Weird.
Still too many dumb turnovers tho. And we can't rebound this half. For some reason. -
This crowd is dumb.
-
Damn this is chippy
-
Stewart is already one of my favorite players ever.
-
Other than living in paradise rather than the many shitholes of the lower 48.......UWhuskytskeet said:This crowd is dumb.
-
Uw is getting a pass for how terrible they have played this evening. Passive would be the nicest way i can say it. Their record will not translate to pac12 schedule as they are playing
-
Hawaii shot 39 3's... one dude was 1-17... their strategy was literally to clank 3's and hope they could get enough offensive rebounds to stay in it.
I'll give Hawaii credit, they knew they couldn't match up physically, so they did literally everything else to try and pull this one out.
I thought UW did a nice job keeping their head's together... at the end of the day they made Hawaii look like the chumps they were trying to bate us to be.
