Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Diamond Head Classic OFFICIAL Thread

2456711

Comments

  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,268

    ntxduck said:

    Ball state is a Good opponent!!!

    So is Texas Southern!!
    No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    Y'all don't wanna see the quad 1! Ya don't wanna!
  • BroadcastingDawg
    BroadcastingDawg Member Posts: 1,636
    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    Ball state is a Good opponent!!!

    So is Texas Southern!!
    No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.
    I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference.

    Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...

    See the difference? Jesus.
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,268

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    Ball state is a Good opponent!!!

    So is Texas Southern!!
    No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.
    I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference.

    Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...

    See the difference? Jesus.
    Ball state is not a good opponent. At all. By any metric.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    Ball state is a Good opponent!!!

    So is Texas Southern!!
    No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.
    I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference.

    Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...

    See the difference? Jesus.
    Ball state is not a good opponent. At all. By any metric.
    Net, RPI, KenPom, and Sagarin all disagree with you. Quad 3 is "good". Quad 4 is "shit". Quad 2 is "pretty good". Quad 1 is "great". HTH
  • TommySQC
    TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813
    Horrific game vs Hawaii so far
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,268
    2001400ex said:

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    Ball state is a Good opponent!!!

    So is Texas Southern!!
    No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.
    I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference.

    Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...

    See the difference? Jesus.
    Ball state is not a good opponent. At all. By any metric.
    Net, RPI, KenPom, and Sagarin all disagree with you. Quad 3 is "good". Quad 4 is "shit". Quad 2 is "pretty good". Quad 1 is "great". HTH
    So 75% of teams are classified as good? Sure
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Have we finally figured out Stewart will make every shot if we get him the ball?
  • those last 8 minutes were as impressive as the first 12 were bad
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,038 Founders Club
    ntxduck said:

    2001400ex said:

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    ntxduck said:

    Ball state is a Good opponent!!!

    So is Texas Southern!!
    No one tried to seriously claim Texas Southern as a good win, is the difference.
    I didn't say it was a "good win" cum stain, I said that Ball St. is a good opponent who we beat by 20+. They're a decent basketball team expected to finish near the top of their conference.

    Oregon almost lost to Texas Southern who was 3-9...

    See the difference? Jesus.
    Ball state is not a good opponent. At all. By any metric.
    Net, RPI, KenPom, and Sagarin all disagree with you. Quad 3 is "good". Quad 4 is "shit". Quad 2 is "pretty good". Quad 1 is "great". HTH
    So 75% of teams are classified as good? Sure
    Don't want any hurt feelings